You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
NATO says killed 55 Taliban in Afghan clashes
2006-11-26
KABUL (Rooters) - NATO forces have killed 55 Taliban fighters in fierce clashes in southern Afghanistan, the alliance said on Sunday, while a suicide bomber killed seven Afghans at a restaurant in another part of the country.

NATO forces called in close air support after troops came under attack in the southern province of Uruzgan on Saturday, NATO said in a statement issued from the International Security Assitance Force (ISAF) headquarters in Kabul. "Initial battle damage assessment indicates that approximately 50 insurgents were killed in the attack. Regrettably, an ISAF soldier was also killed during the same incident," the statement said.

The nationality of the NATO soldier killed was not disclosed, but Dutch troops form the bulk of NATO presence in Uruzgan, a remote, rugged province, where support for the Taliban is strong.

Also on Saturday, in neighboring Kandahar province, NATO and Afghan soldiers, backed by air support, killed five Taliban in another clash. Three alliance soldiers were wounded. Reuters received several telephone calls from people living in the vicinity, who said more than ten fluffy bunnies villagers were killed by NATO bombing. NATO officials denied those accounts, while Taliban spokesmen could not be reached for comment on their reported losses.
Nice equivalency here. Oh, I forgot, this is rooters, nevermind.
The suicide attack on a restaurant full of Afghans happened in Urgun district of southeastern Paktika province, bordering Pakistan. The attack killed seven people and wounding others. All of the victims were civilians, but several provincial officials, including the district chief, were among the wounded, Paktika's governor Mohammad Akram Khpelwak, told Reuters. "The bomber detonated the explosives attached to his body just after entering the restaurant," the governor said, citing officials and witnesses.

Taliban and their Islamic allies stepped up a suicide attack campaign a year ago as the insurgency gathered fresh momentum, confounding U.S. generals who had been saying it was on its last legs.
Can't trust them US generals, gotta rely on taleb spokemen.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#8  Is the number 55 special? Repeated here and in al Anbar.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-11-26 23:25  

#7  And once again another good news story bout American forces killing off 55 of Muhamhead's camel riding terrorist. Another story that will NEVER be on the network news.

Double Spit!
Posted by: Icerigger   2006-11-26 18:08  

#6  OP:

Al-Reuters is trying to stir up PETA.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-26 17:39  

#5  I'm so cornfused! They keep talking about Afghans, and then say "people". The people of Afghanistan are Afghanis. Afghans are large, skinny dogs will long hair. Is Rooters that dumb, or is this a way to stir the pot a bit?
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-11-26 16:20  

#4  55 less! Hooray!
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-26 15:44  

#3  Taliban spokesmen could not be reached for comment on their reported losses.

Hopefully it is because he got killed, too! :-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-11-26 15:08  

#2  Today's magic number is 55.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-11-26 14:05  

#1  Taliban and their Islamic allies stepped up a suicide attack campaign a year ago as the insurgency gathered fresh momentum...

...A quarter of the victims have been civilians, but hundreds of Taliban along with Afghan forces and over 150 foreign troops have also died in the violence....


The vaunted "taliwhacker uprisng". Let's see, kill ratio: 55 lions of islam to 1 coalition troop Friday and Saturday. However, Rooters sees the total this year as "hundreds of taliban" to over a 150 coalition. Given that the taliwhacker casualty figure is always greater as they drag some bodies and wounded out. Every engagement I read about the ratio is at least 10 to 1... sometimes as much as a 100 to 1.

Gee...is Rooters not telling the truth?
Posted by: anymouse   2006-11-26 13:20  

00:00