You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Texas Refinery Repaired, Working to Double Capacity
2006-11-28
PORT ARTHUR - A year ago at this time, Motiva's sprawling refinery here was still cleaning up an epic mess left by Hurricane Rita. The storm downed 500 power poles, destroyed two water-cooling towers, and dented rows of storage tanks like soda cans. Winds whipped one building so hard they peeled off a Motiva sign. Underneath was a tile mosaic bearing the name of a well-known past owner, which got its start near this marshy site more than 100 years ago after the discovery of the legendary Spindletop oil field. "We called it the ghost of Texaco," said Darrell Segura, a human resources consultant with Motiva, during a recent tour.

Today, this facility has more than patched things up. It is girding for an expansion that will double its capacity to 600,000 barrels per day and could make it the largest refinery in the nation by 2010.

"It really doesn't make sense to build anywhere but the Gulf," said Forrest Lauher, Motiva's venture manager on the Port Arthur refinery expansion by the joint venture between Shell Oil Co. and Saudi Refining, an affiliate of Saudi Aramco.

This $3.5 billion project also shows why refiners are choosing to expand existing facilities rather than start from scratch. As huge and complicated as the project is, it will still be less expensive than building a new facility at a new site. But the rising costs of everything from steel to construction labor on projects like this may give some refiners pause about pushing forward with expansion plans. And winning public approval for additions of any kind is harder than ever to secure.

Refiners have announced plans to boost capacity by almost 2 million barrels by 2010, or about 11 percent above the current rate. This month alone, Marathon Oil announced that its board approved a $3.2 billion expansion of its Garyville, La., refinery; Chevron Corp. said it is seeking a permit to increase gasoline output by 15 percent in Pascagoula, Miss.; and a news report said Valero Energy Corp. is considering a $1 billion expansion at its Port Arthur refinery.

The flurry of activity has been fueled by high crude prices, rising energy demands and strong refining profit margins. This confluence of favorable trends led one Wall Street analyst to dub the 2004-to-2006 period the "Golden Age of Refining." A provision in the 2005 Energy Bill, which allows refiners to reduce their tax bills by deducting equipment costs over a shorter period, has also spurred expansions.

But that may change next year. The Democrats, who recently won control of Congress, have said they plan to eliminate those tax breaks. They describe them as a sweetheart deal for Big Oil during a time of high profits.

If refining margins weaken in 2007, as some analysts have predicted, oil companies could become less bullish about refinery expansions. But Tom Kloza, senior analyst at the Oil Price Information Service, said a small fraction of projects are likely to fall by the wayside, regardless of the economics surrounding them. In a period of intense competition, he suggests some refiners announce expansion projects they never intend to build simply to shoo away competitors who may have similar plans. "There can be a lot of posturing around feasibility studies," he said.

Motiva's project in Port Arthur is not one of those likely to fall off the table. Tractors are already moving dirt and preparing the grounds for incoming equipment, including a new crude-processing unit, coker, reformer, sulfur recovery unit and a new high-tech control center. And a planning team of more than 40 people at Motiva is nearly done with an engineering and design study of the expansion.

The project's leaders are so confident Motiva will give final approval to the project by next summer, they are in the process of ordering the equipment to be installed at the site. The massive project will add roughly 300 jobs at the refinery, one reason public officials have embraced the expansion. Other refinery add-ons in the region could also help lift the area. Port Arthur Mayor Oscar Ortiz has described it a "great" project that will create thousands of construction jobs. He has noted that the city has given Motiva a $45 million incentive package and a 20-year tax abatement.

But that doesn't mean everyone is happy about Motiva's expansion plans. Hilton Kelley, a community activist in Port Arthur, has pushed the company to reduce its emissions, threatening his nonprofit would take legal action to block public permits needed for the project. Under a deal reached with Kelley's group this month, Motiva agreed to pledge $2 million to a foundation dedicated to improving the quality of housing in the neighborhoods adjacent to the refinery, support commercial development in impoverished areas of Port Arthur and establish community programs. It also agreed to install some but not all of the equipment requested by Kelley and his group to reduce and monitor harmful emissions from the plant.
Posted by:trailing wife

#4  Having most of our oil refining capacity in one spot also creates the most likely target for a one-nuke strike on the US. Few would die, but the country would be in a world of hurt.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2006-11-28 19:41  

#3  There's a small refinery up in Denver that's been trying to expand for 20 years or more, without success. Pueblo recently offered them a deal to build on part of the old slag heap from the defunct Colorado Steel and Iron works. There are small oilfields in Florence, about 20 miles away, and the Denver/Julesburg basin produces some crude. Most of what the refinery will process will probably come from either Western Slope oilfields, or the Williston Basin up on the Wyoming/Montana/Dakotas border area. Either way, it'll probably be a profitable deal if everything works out.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-11-28 15:43  

#2  "It really doesn't make sense to build anywhere but the Gulf,"

Yeah, right. It makes lots of sense to have all the nation's refining capacity in one place, subject to hurricane devastation any given year. (sarc, in case you couldn't tell.)

It only makes sense because it's the only place the industry can get permission to build or expand refineries. Can't have those nasty things near the beautiful people, you know.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-11-28 10:55  

#1  Texas Refinery Repaired, Working to Double Capacity

Which explains why gas went up five cents a gallon here this morning.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-11-28 09:48  

00:00