You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Thousands of Zimbabweans die from starvation, disease
2006-11-29
More people are dying from starvation and disease in Zimbabwe under President Robert Mugabe than are killed in the war in Iraq or the conflict in Darfur, said an African archbishop.

Archbishop Pius Ncube of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, said about 3,500 people are dying each week in his country from a "unique convergence of malnutrition, poverty and AIDS." He said the world has forgotten about the plight of Zimbabweans although "hunger, illness and desperation stalk our land."

As many people die prematurely in Zimbabwe in one week as in one month in Iraq when the violence is at its worst
As many people die prematurely in Zimbabwe in one week as in one month in Iraq when the violence is at its worst, he said. In October, 3,700 people died in Iraq. The mortality rate in Zimbabwe is also a thousand per week higher than the Darfur region of western Sudan.

Archbishop Ncube said World Health Organization figures reveal that life expectancy in Zimbabwe is the lowest in the world -- 34 years for women and 37 years for men. The U.N. World Food Program estimates that 6.1 million Zimbabweans, about half of the 12 million population, face starvation. Zimbabwe's unemployment rate is 80 percent, and the country has the fastest-declining economy in the world.

Archbishop Ncube, who was in London to raise funds for an AIDS charity, blamed the crisis on the mismanagement of the country under Mugabe over the last seven years.

"Zimbabwe is not a nation at war," Archbishop Ncube said. "It used to be able to feed itself and its neighbors. Zimbabwe used to have one of the highest life-expectancy rates in Africa." He said the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front government, or Zanu-PF, was not investing in medicine to treat AIDS because it was "more interested in importing military aircraft from China than protecting (the) lives of its people."

"We remain in the grip of a dictator. ... We cannot compete for attention in a world fixated by events in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Sudan and elsewhere. Yet we need the international community to maintain pressure on Zanu-PF now as much as ever before," he said.

Moral of the story, kiddies: forget growing up to be a US president. Become an anti-Western dictator. It's more lucrative and you get better press.
Posted by:Pappy

#13  Shieldwolf - do you mean "peace" kills more innocents than "war"? - who'da thunk it?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2006-11-29 22:33  

#12  Unfortunately, the West blew it in Zimbabwe in the 1980s when they collectively anointed Mugabe, and then he did the typical post-colonial Africa shuffle : "One man, one vote, one time". What is really revealing is that the Zimbabweans were better off under aparthied in Rhodesia : economy was growing, country was exporting huge surpluses of food, the infant mortality rate was low, life expectancy was higher, and many fewer people were dying per week - even during the active warfare stage.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-11-29 20:36  

#11  AlanC, while I was limiting my example to sub-Saharan Africa, my prescription was global in scope.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-11-29 16:36  

#10  Zen, you are right but not inclusive enough. This is a perfect example of tribalism in the 21st century. BUT, it is not limited to SSA. Look at the Islamo world or the Balkans or Russia and you'll see tribalism. There are signs of this devolution most everywhere where each clan or tribe thinks it should have it's own society (see Sharia in UK)

Groupism is going to be the death of civilization unless something turns this around. Mini-states are not sustainable and the more of them there are the more violent will be the re-merger (think leveraged buyouts with guns)
Posted by: AlanC   2006-11-29 15:27  

#9  Mugabe epitomizes all that is wrong with many of Africa's sub-Saharan nations. He believes himself to be nothing less than a great tribal chieftan whereby all wealth, material possessions and even the clan members themselves are his own direct possessions.

In reality he is nothing more than a tribal chieftan overseeing a backward autocracy whose looting mentality knows no bounds. Showing any sensibility to the Zimbabwean people's suffering or his country's economic plight would be seen as a weakness.

For Mugabe's sort there can be only one prescription; A swift dose of hot lead. His innumerable transgressions are crimes against humanity.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-11-29 14:55  

#8  Didn't Mugabe say a few years ago that Zimbabwe would be better off with about half as many people? Of course, the fact that the people starving are from the primary opposition tribe is a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: RWV   2006-11-29 13:26  

#7  ;)

I was slightly bothered , the first 35 words gave me slight cause for concern , then the coffee kicked in and i woke up :)
Posted by: MacNails   2006-11-29 11:09  

#6  McNails, yep, subtle I ain't.

Really didn't think that one needed a tag, no? ;^)
Posted by: AlanC   2006-11-29 11:00  

#5  ooh the sarcasm alan
Posted by: MacNails   2006-11-29 10:26  

#4  I don't see any problems.
Posted by: Walter Duranty, NYT   2006-11-29 10:18  

#3  McNails you are totally wrong.

He is managing the country very well!

You are using your, obviously racist, western perspective and assuming that a country should be managed to the benefit of the people. Tosh, pish and piddle man. The only goal here is the personal wealth and power of the chief and his cohort.
Posted by: AlanC   2006-11-29 08:53  

#2  President Robert Mugabe couldnt run a bath without the aid of his goons , how people expect him to manage a country is far beyond my obviously low IQ . Taking agricultural land off educated farmers and redistributing it to people who have no skills was deemed as a successful political/social ruse meant to play on the fear of the white man , but as we all know he's only happy bleeding the country's wealth for his own selfish means .. What I dont understand is why noone has popped him off yet .. Vile man
Posted by: MacNails   2006-11-29 07:41  

#1  Well that's nitpicking, isn't it.




-Nigel Tufnel-
-Lead Guitarist, Spinal Tap-
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-11-29 07:23  

00:00