You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
YJCMTSU: NYC Backs Off Rule Change on Gender
2006-12-06
You just knew SFGate would pick this up and re-run it, lol.
New York (AP) -- City health officials Tuesday backed off a plan that would have allowed New Yorkers to switch the sex on their birth certificates without undergoing sex-change surgery.
Whoa, now that's important.
Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden said the issue needed further study, in part to guarantee it wouldn't conflict with federal rules now being developed.
Rules, rules, rules - keep the bureaucracy rolling along...
Like most other cities and states, New York has long allowed people who have undergone sex-change surgery to get a new birth certificate reflecting the change.
Yah, shure. Gotta keep the paperwork current with the equipment.
The city's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene had proposed in September that the policy be liberalized further to include people who had taken other steps short of surgery to irrevocably alter their gender identity.
Like what? Oh, wait, I don't wanna know...
The new policy, for example, would have allowed birth record changes for people taking hormones to alter their appearance.
Appearance. New bumps, missing bulges, that sort of thing?
The plan would have made the city the first in the country with such a policy, health officials said.
We're No 1! We're No 1! Sheesh.
While it delayed making that change, the Board of Health went ahead with a related policy revision that for the first time will allow people who have undergone sex-change surgery to list their new sex on their birth documents. Previously, the city had simply issued a new birth certificate that removed any reference to gender.
Well, the new equipment doesn't work, so...
Cole Thaler, a transgender rights attorney, said he was disappointed by the board's decision not to implement the new policy. "Some people are physically unable to have the surgery, for health reasons," Thaler said. "I'm hopeful that time will lead to a more fair result."
I'm sorry. Sheesh just doesn't seem to cover this.
Posted by:.com

#9  Why not just NOT record sex on Birth certificates?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2006-12-06 13:03  

#8  Like most other cities and states, New York has long allowed people who have undergone sex-change surgery to get a new birth certificate reflecting the change.


Born again has a different meaning in NY.
Posted by: DoDo   2006-12-06 12:05  

#7  Now that's metrosexual!
Posted by: Raj   2006-12-06 11:42  

#6  And underneath he's wearing a black lace bro.
Posted by: Steve White   2006-12-06 11:23  

#5  Jeebus, pictures really are worth a thousand words!
Posted by: BA   2006-12-06 11:06  

#4  I'll bet transfats did that to boob guy.

IIRC, he's a professional model showing off an aussie stylist's brand new concept, the "moobs" (man boobs).
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-12-06 10:41  

#3  I'll bet transfats did that to boob guy.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-12-06 10:29  

#2  I for one applaud NYC because obviously they have solved the many more important issue like education, healthcare, drugs, and crime and can now zero in on this important issue.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-12-06 10:03  

#1  What don't they understand about BIRTH certificate? Maybe an 'alteration' amendment is appropriate, but to change the BIRTH certificate is something that would only occur to historical revisionists.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-12-06 07:25  

00:00