You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash
2006-12-10
Yeah, sure. We bug everybody. We just can't stand not knowing the important shit, like whether Diana and Dodo did the nasty on the bearskin rug and what brand of caviar they preferred. It's what we live for. BTW, did you know Putin holds seances over Rasputin's bones? Yup. Purdy thruthy, ain't it?
The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.

Among extraordinary details due to emerge in the report by former Metropolitan police commissioner Lord Stevens is the revelation that the US security service was bugging her calls in the hours before she was killed in a car crash in Paris.
Is Lord Stevens sane - or one to the "normal" UK cop types?
In a move that raises fresh questions over transatlantic agreements on intelligence-sharing, the surveillance arm of the US has admitted listening to her conversations as she stayed at the Ritz hotel, but failed to notify MI6. Stevens is understood to have been assured that the 39 classified documents detailing Diana's final conversations did not reveal anything sinister or contain material that might help explain her death.

Scotland Yard's inquiry, published this Thursday, also throws up further intelligence links with the Princess of Wales on the night she died. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul, was in the pay of the French equivalent of M15. Stevens traced £100,000 he had amassed in 14 French bank accounts though no payments have been linked to Diana's death.
Well, he died. So, silly me, I'm like thinging the crash thingy wasn't really planned, y'know?
Stevens's conclusion is that Diana, her companion Dodi Fayed, and Paul himself died in an accident caused by Paul driving too fast through the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris while under the influence of drink. The car was being pursued by photographers at the time.
Gosh, go figure, huh? No Polonium 210, no secret plot to steal North Sea oil, just regular old run-of-the-mill stupidity. Damn.
Tests have confirmed that Paul was more than three times over the French drink-drive limit and was travelling at 'excessive' speed. The inquiry will quash a number of conspiracy theories that have circulated since 31 August 1997, among them that Diana was pregnant. It also found no evidence that the princess was planning to get engaged to Dodi, son of Mohamed Fayed.

The Harrods tycoon believes that Paul's blood samples were swapped to portray him as a drunk in an elaborate cover-up by the establishment to stop Diana marrying Dodi, a Muslim.
Hey - you got Chucky in the bag - ain't than enough?
Stevens is expected to concede that while there was a mix-up it was an accident and that the original French post-mortem which found that Paul was three-times over the French drink-drive limit was correct.

He is also expected to discount the role of the white Fiat Uno which struck Diana's car shortly before the crash, even though British police officers have failed to track down the vehicle which left paintwork on the black Mercedes.
Prolly driven by MI42 - Mormon Secret Intelligence.
The inquiry will support the findings of the original French accident inquiry in criticising the paparazzi as a possible reason for encouraging Paul to speed. The 'bright light' theory - the claim that the driver was deliberately blinded by a beam immediately before the crash - is also dismissed by Stevens.
So, like, kill the paparazzi. Works for me.
Mebbe Clinton and Tenet were doing their own version of LBJ & J Edgar.
Posted by:.com

#7  Hey - you got Chucky in the bag - ain't than enough?

Ya mean he's wearing a burqa too these days? Jebus.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-12-10 22:59  

#6  They neglect to remind readers that this happened while Clinton was President. I have already seen leftist posters curse Bush for this and cite it as yet another example of the Patriot Act undermining our civil libertines liberties. They know their audience, its short memory, and its dependence on standard memes.

On a more serious note, the reason for this might well have been CIA fears that Islamic radicals could use a connection through Al-Fayed to set the princess up for kidnapping or assassination.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2006-12-10 22:42  

#5  Lol. KBK. A 'source' I'll bet. That's double-deep-secret NYT-speak, no? Shit, man, I'm ready to be a 'journalist'! Woohoo! ;-)
Posted by: .com   2006-12-10 19:33  

#4  The NYT told them we were bugging her phone?

Who, exactly, 'admitted' this?
Posted by: KBK   2006-12-10 19:27  

#3  I could never understand why she was so popular. And then I've seen the picture of the Royal family---mystery solved (Brits were just so happy to have a royal who isn't dog ugly).
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-12-10 16:33  

#2  You laugh, but Diana tried to slip me a fake US$100. I told the bitch to go fuck herself with her Monopoly money, of course, but I expect she was down the off-license with it as soon as I turned my back.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-12-10 14:38  

#1  The Secret Service??!! Was she threatening the President or counterfeiting US currency? If Lord Stevens is actually making this accusation - he must be off his meds.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-12-10 13:24  

00:00