You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Suspicion about imams grows as terror links pile up
2006-12-12
Our local MSM Keith Ellison supporting freakshow of a newspaper dared print this. Just about fainted. Little Green Footballs readers also picked it up.

The six imams whoÂ’ve retained CAIR as legal counsel in a possible suit against US Airways are the subject of Katherine KerstenÂ’s piece for the normally idiotarian Minneapolis Star Tribune: Suspicion about imams grows as terror links pile up.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the imams’ legal representative, is an organization that “we know has ties to terrorism,” Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in 2003. And the Muslim American Society, which is also supporting the imams? It’s the American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the Chicago Tribune, which called it “the world’s most influential Islamic fundamentalist group.”

How about Omar Shahin, the imamsÂ’ spokesman and also president of the North American Imams Federation? He is a native of Jordan, who says he became a U.S. citizen in 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Shahin served as president of Islamic Center of Tucson (ICT), that cityÂ’s largest mosque.

The ICT is well known. The mosque has “an extensive history of terror links,” according to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, who testified about terrorist financing before the Senate Banking Committee in July 2005.

The Washington Post described these links in a 2002 article. “Tucson was one of the first points of contact in the United States for the jihadist group that evolved into al Qaeda,” the Post reported. And the ICT? It held “basically the first cell of al Qaeda in the United States; that is where it all started,” said Rita Katz, a terrorism expert quoted by the Post.

Now what would be interesting is to see a lawer with balls from US Airways bring up these terrorist links.
Posted by:Icerigger

#9  If the imams sue, US Airlines should subpoena every Muslim these "imams" ever knew, down to their dental and tax records.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2006-12-12 16:58  

#8  In the process, a real blanket party atmosphere ought to prevail.

Yep, a small hand-towel and a bar of soap in the old carry-on luggage. Very effecive.

Posted by: Mick Dundee   2006-12-12 16:25  

#7  While it might be difficult to prove, US Airways should consider filing a countersuit against the imams for intentionally disrupting a flight. Bill them for the jet's idle time, delays and extra crew pay and so on.

The fact that they seated themselves in the 9-11 configuration (with at least one individual purposefully placing himself in first class without such ticketing), should serve as strong evidence that were seeking to intentionally interfere with the flight. The lawsuit could roll up into many tens of thousands of dollars rather quickly including attorney's fees. Nothing like a costly settlement to shut these maggots up.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-12-12 16:08  

#6  "Blanket party" What a wonderful blast from the past. I think the collective BS level in the US is getting close to that point.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2006-12-12 14:10  

#5  slightly off topic geographically, but on global point..

..Once we found the two mosques the outer-cordon circled the objectives. For some reason, most of the leaders of the enemy are mullahs and they usually live near mosques. That isnÂ’t profiling, that is a fact.

Betsy Barks Again: scroll...
Posted by: RD   2006-12-12 12:12  

#4  This is nothing but organized harrassment by Muzzie central. They think a long campaign of this plus frivolous law suits will cause everyone to drop their guard. I think it will produce the opposite and make everyone realize what a pestilence they are.

I think citizen arrests for disturbing the peace ought to be carried out. In the process, a real blanket party atmosphere ought to prevail. After more than their fair share of beatings, maybe they'd give it up.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-12-12 10:51  

#3  I flew US Airways to/from OKC, thru Phoenix, last week and I felt safer knowing mooslims might boycott them. That should be their new motto: "terror-imam free since...". Think their sales wouldn't increase?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-12-12 09:50  

#2  Here's hoping US Airways stands firm against this blatant attempt to extort money from the infidel.

CAIR would like to see a settlement out of court. If I were advising US Airways I'd want the case in court in order to be able to take depositions of the imams under oath and on record.
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-12-12 09:20  

#1  Went around with one of the original reporters, aka slowpitch softball pitchers, about this.
What about the seatbelt extenders?
He said he often requests what he doesn't need, like more peanuts or a pillow.
Jeez.
Problem with journos like him is that they think people believe them.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey   2006-12-12 09:11  

00:00