You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Credit Suisse Says India Will Overtake China's Growth in 2007
2006-12-13
Posted by:phil_b

#11  I'm glad Joe cleared that up for us.

Joe, buddy, I'm begging you man. Take it easy on the caps lock.
Posted by: Mike N.   2006-12-13 23:01  

#10  were economically uninvolved -- that is, never touched actual money from birth until death

Reminds me of some wealthy liberals.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-12-13 19:54  

#9  When Mr. Wife was starting up factories there in 1989-'91, he told me that 70% of Indians were economically uninvolved -- that is, never touched actual money from birth until death. I'm sure that's somewhat improved now, as I'm under the impression that India hadn't started opening up at that point (he was working with a pre-existing company that his had bought, or gone into partnership with), but what are the statistics now?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-12-13 11:09  

#8  And the Indian communist leaders return from visits to Beijing and launch strikes against the Japanese joint ventures that are successful - car exports etc.
They prevent reforms of labor, infrastucture, banking etc that would enhance economic growth.

China plays its Indian cards well..
Posted by: john   2006-12-13 09:43  

#7  Even the current 9% rate isn't enough for real poverty relief. India could get 13-14% growth if it bit the bullet and implemented labor reforms.

Here is one silly example - small scale reservations.

Certain categories of goods within India may only be manufactured by small scale enterprises. This is a lovely Gandhian idea and quite stupid.
These enterprises are inefficient.

A company wishing to mass produce toys for example cannot. Meanwhile the Chinese mega factories get orders throughout the world.
Posted by: john   2006-12-13 09:37  

#6  Growth rates may be higher but the Chinese economic base is much larger. They started economic reforms a full decade before India and India is saddled with a lot of commies who really believe in communism (unlike their masters in China).
Posted by: john   2006-12-13 09:31  

#5  Means continued high oil, high commodity prices, and China will continue to expand its influence in Burma and the Straits in an effort to flank India.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-12-13 08:34  

#4  Uniting Jolong sounds like a Nork code phrase. I'm getting more suspicous of you by the day.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-12-13 03:03  

#3  We guessed.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-12-13 02:44  

#2  Sorry - #1 suppos to be me, AGAIN.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-12-13 01:48  

#1  See also WAFF.com > FPIF.org articles > US USES INDIA TO CONTAIN CHINA, + SINO-CENTRIC ORDER IN EAST ASIA.
Posted by: Uniting Jolung8859   2006-12-13 01:47  

00:00