You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Leaky Leahy vows to guard privacy rights: Declares "Peace on Terror"
2006-12-13
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The incoming Democratic chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee promised on Wednesday to combat what he denounced as President George W. Bush's war-time trampling of American rights.

"We have a duty to repair real damage done to our system of government over the last few years," Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont said in outlining his panel's agenda for the 110th, Democratic-led Congress, which is set to convene on January 4. "Americans' privacy is a price the Bush administration is willing to pay for the cavalier way it is spawning new databanks. But privacy rights belong to the people, not to the government," Leahy said.

Leahy made the comments in a speech entitled, "Ensuring Liberty and Security Through Checks and Balances," to be delivered at the Georgetown University Law Center.

Leahy and other Democrats have complained about Bush's tactics in the war on terror, particularly the Republican president's warrantless domestic spying program that Democrats and some Republicans say violates the law. But as the minority in Congress, Democrats were unable to hold hearings or pass legislation to stop or revise such programs.

Having won control of Congress from Republicans in last month's elections, Democrats have promised oversight hearings on Bush's prosecution of the unpopular Iraq war. They will also be positioned to push legislation to change the president's policies, though Bush could veto them. "We are way overdue in catching up to the erosion of privacy," Leahy said. "This will be one of our highest priorities."

Leahy said he also would press for accountability "over the use and abuse of billions of taxpayers' dollars, sent as development aid to Iraq." He also said his committee would consider measures to help Iraq build an effective law enforcement and legal system, a need stressed by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group that made recommendations to Bush on changing his Iraq policies.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  Dubya correctly interpreted 9-11 as that either America rules the world, or America will be destroyed. Radical Islam = Osama can't complain becuz of their late 18990's, pre-9-11 FATWAS declared agz AMerica; + ditto for the US-INternational Left's unilateral reservation of its right TO USE FORCE + VIOLENCE, ANY MEANS NECESSARY, IFF AMERICA DOES NOT ADOPT OWG + SOCIALISM btwn Year 2015-2020.

IT WAS RADICAL ISLAM + ANTI-US LEFTS THAT DECLARED WAR AGZ AMERICA, AND IS THE TRUE
"BULLY" HERE. "FORTRESS AMERICA = AMERIKA" IN ANY FORM will NOT work as long as we continue to elect Waffle-ist = Potemkinist, PYWAR leaders whom argue "USSA, NOT USSR, ergo USSA is the One AND ONLY ONE whom has to surrender". ALL YOU'RE GONNA END UP WITH IS A OWG = is a GLOBAL ARMY- MILITARY STATE THAT IS ALSO A GLOBAL ANARCHY/MAFIA/CRIMINAL/NEPOTIST/CANTON-IST STATE, one that history + human behavior suggests may inevitably devolve into GLOBAL WARRING STATE(S), e.g ancient China = Asian Steppes. GOING BACKWARD, NOT FORWARD. Switzerland at present may be a "specialist/
niche" Euro-power, full of mountains, beauty, and Banking, but it is just one one Euro-State/Power among many and no way is it the econ-mil-pol strongest - iff Canton-centric Switzerland does NOT dominate either Europe or Eurasia or any Region at present, what makes one believe a GLOBAL, "SWITZERLAND"-style OWG WILL???
SECULAR OR ISLAMIST, THE RADICS ARE FIGHTING FOR TOTALITARIAN CENTRALISM + GOVT-ISM + UNIVERS STRATIFICATION.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-12-13 20:35  

#5  LeahysÂ’ prepared comments were pretty much as expected. Investigate the BushCo-Military-Industrial complex, NSA = McCarthyism, Illegals deserve amnesty cause their just like dear ole granpappy, and the Administration will have to felate the Dems if they want any movement on new judicial appointments. However, the Vermont Senator also announced he is establishing the completely new “Senate Select Sub-Committee on Human Rights”. One can only imagine how this catch-all Committee will attempt to give credence for every bitch, moan, and hand ringing ACLU-type issue ever to come down the pike
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-12-13 15:08  

#4  Actually, Leahy may be on to something here. That is, the democrats cannot out-do the republicans as far as security goes; but the trouble is that they try, by embracing security programs that are wrong.

So, in truth, they might actually gain political advantage by going *against* greater security.

Think about it, if they went whole-hog, and offered to go back to even before the 1990s in domestic security, how many people would be very interested? For example:

1) Airline security. Abolish the TSA. Allow people to board flights with just a picture ID. Travel to Mexico and Canada with just State ID.

2) Pass a federal law severely restricting the use of security cameras.

3) Outlaw non-medical, non-research DNA databases except by the FBI, and then only for felony convicts and crime evidence.

4) Abolish a national ID card. If you need one, a passport is sufficient.

5) Prohibit the CIA, the Pentagon, and other federal agencies from conducting domestic spying operations; which will be solely FBI jurisdiction.

Stuff like this.

NOW, I DID NOT SAY ANY OF IT WAS A GOOD IDEA, JUST THAT THE PUBLIC MIGHT LIKE IT.

So objectively, even if it is a really bad idea, do you think the democrats could make political hay out of it?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-12-13 14:57  

#3  the Republican president's warrantless domestic spying program

And by 'domestic' call, we mean a call with one end overseas.
Posted by: SteveS   2006-12-13 12:57  

#2  "Peace on Terror"
???! I'm getting the feeling that the country would be better off if Flight 93 made it to Capitol Hill.
Posted by: ed   2006-12-13 12:51  

#1  Precious Patrick, Maroon-VT
Posted by: Phineter Thraviger   2006-12-13 11:35  

00:00