You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Troops in Iraq to get fire-resistant uniforms
2006-12-15
WASHINGTON — Flame-resistant uniforms will be standard issue for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan by early 2007, Pentagon officials say. More than 160,000 suits made of the flame-retardant fabric NOMEX will be sent to combat zones, said Thomas Edwards, assistant deputy chief of staff for Army logistics.

The Pentagon moved quickly, Edwards said, because Iraqi insurgents are using homemade bombs and targeting the fuel tanks of vehicles. The bombs, called improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, are the top killer of U.S. troops in Iraq. "Guys in the area of operations said, 'Give us all the fireproof uniforms you can find and then kick up production,' " Edwards said.

After receiving the Army's request Sept. 21, the Pentagon shipped 70,000 suits by Oct. 13 to outfit troops who patrol outside U.S. bases, Edwards said. It will cost about $70 million for the uniforms, hoods and gloves. NOMEX, a DuPont-manufactured fiber, resists burning for about 9 seconds, long enough to allow troops to escape from a burning vehicle, Edwards said.

Margo Hughey, a 68-year-old grandmother from Columbus, Ind., said she has raised $2,000 to buy the suits for troops after learning of attacks with diesel-soaked explosives from relatives serving in Iraq. She and friend April Johnson, 41, also contacted Indiana's two senators — Republican Richard Lugar and Democrat Evan Bayh — because they did not believe the Pentagon had acted quickly enough. "When I learned our own family members were in extreme danger, and it did not look like they would be supplied by the DOD (Department of Defense) or the Army I knew I must do something," Hughey said.

Lugar contacted the Pentagon but had not received a response, spokesman Andy Fisher said.

Edwards said the Pentagon moved quickly: "I don't know how long it took Granny to raise that two thousand bucks, but it couldn't have been a helluva lot faster than we did in getting these uniforms."
Note that the USA Today "reporter" doesn't have the sense to tell us when Granny got her knickers in a bunch, i.e. before or after the Pentagon was on the case, but the real message here is clear:
Never piss off Granny.
Posted by:.com

#7  No, Commodore Frank. That's just an unnamed volunteer to brave the 3000F flames for a short time in order to turn the steaks on the grill at the forward operating base.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-12-15 18:38  

#6  who is that? Homer Simpson?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-12-15 18:33  

#5  Want fire resistant uniforms, d'ye, well how about this model:

3000suit

And matching mits to pick up that hot shrapnel, perhaps:

glove-bar
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-12-15 18:31  

#4  New media theme- Bush is too slow in issuing fire resistant uniforms- in 5-4-3...
Posted by: Grunter   2006-12-15 14:44  

#3  More Fire-retardant than fireproof, I think.

And I think this is the stuff that Michael Yon wore while out there. He said it didn't make you that much hotter or uncomfortable.
Posted by: Anon4021   2006-12-15 12:55  

#2  Chuck, I wore a nomex flight suit for years and, unless they changed the formula, it was the most comfortable uniform I had. Although no one ever told us that it was only fireproof for 9 seconds.
Posted by: RWV   2006-12-15 11:36  

#1  Balancing the chnace, somewhat remote, of catching fire versus the NEVER ENDING discomfort of wearing the Nomex???? You'll lose more guys to heat stroke than save from burns.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-12-15 08:44  

00:00