| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| WND: Hamas threatens attacks on U.S. |
| 2006-12-26 |
| Members of Hamas are debating whether to carry out attacks against the United States and may hit American targets if the U.S. continues to support Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' call for new elections, Hamas leaders told WND in a series of interviews. "There is no doubt that Abu Mazen (Abbas) was encouraged to decide early elections after receiving American promises to support him politically and military," Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, the group's declared "resistance" department, told WND. The terror leader accused the U.S. of instigating a Palestinian civil war. "Here the Americans did not support the elections, they actually gave their support and their encouragement to a Palestinian civil war. It is our duty to prove to the Americans that they chose the wrong policy exactly like it is the case in Iraq," said Abu Abdullah, considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' so-called military wing. Abu Abdullah told WND Hamas has not yet decided to attack the U.S., "but one cannot guarantee that this will be the situation if the conspiracy of chasing our government succeeds." Asked which U.S. targets Hamas would hit, Abu Abdullah replied, "Do you think that I can give you an answer to this question? I can say that the Middle East is full of American targets and the world has had the occasion to learn what are the weapons of the anti-American forces in the region." ... Several Hamas leaders told WND meetings were held in recent weeks in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank to discuss the possibility of targeting the U.S. due to its perceived support of Fatah against Hamas. Abu Abdullah told WND Hamas' political decision for now is to try to convince the international community, including the U.S., they must "recognize and respect the democratic choices of the Palestinian people and to respect its government." But, he said, if new elections indeed are held, "I would not be surprised if a change takes place in our present policy regarding attacks against American targets in the region." "We are saying that in case of a scenario where elections are something concrete and not a political threat like it seems to be now, there is a real possibility that resistance forces in the region will hit American targets. The U.S. is maintaining its support to the idea of the elections and so is the American servant (British Prime Minister) Tony Blair," Abu Abdullah said. Rest at link. |
| Posted by:ed |
| #16 No Dunno. It was a convoy to interview applicants to American universities |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2006-12-26 23:57 |
| #15 Didn't they blow up a convoy of trainers in SUV's with an IED a few years ago? Trainers who tried to help these animals establish a rule of law? I recall they did. |
| Posted by: Dunno 2006-12-26 22:36 |
| #14 Joe, I have a feeling I've heard that once before. ;-) |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2006-12-26 22:10 |
| #13 Thats what Dem Congresses [+ Dem Potuses]are for -FORTRESS IRAQ, ISRAEL, etal. scenarios > Radical Iran will have to either forswear ambitions of empire, i.e. risk domestic/internal destabilizations wid in Iran; or else intensify Govt-suppor terror attacks throughout ME + World. In any case, won't occur until after new Dem Congress is sworn in. MOUD = BILL CLINTON > OWN PUBLIC COMMENTS/RANTS HAVE PRE-CONDEMNED HIM, which for Moud means the UNSC is already technically "justified" in resorting to [US-led?] mil action to remove him from de facto state power. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-12-26 22:03 |
| #12 Thats what Dem Congresses [+ Dem Potuses]are for -FORTRESS IRAQ, ISRAEL, etal. scenarios > Radical Iran will have to either forswear ambitions of empire, i.e. risk domestic/internal destabilizations wid in Iran; or else intensify Govt-suppor terror attacks throughout ME + World. In any case, won't occur until after new Dem Congress is sworn in. MOUD = BILL CLINTON > OWN PUBLIC COMMENTS/RANTS HAVE PRE-CONDEMNED HIM, which for Moud means the UNSC is already technically "justified" in resorting to [US-led?] mil action to remove him from de facto state power. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-12-26 22:03 |
| #11 Thats what Dem Congresses [+ Dem Potuses]are for -FORTRESS IRAQ, ISRAEL, etal. scenarios > Radical Iran will have to either forswear ambitions of empire, i.e. risk domestic/internal destabilizations wid in Iran; or else intensify Govt-suppor terror attacks throughout ME + World. In any case, won't occur until after new Dem Congress is sworn in. MOUD = BILL CLINTON > OWN PUBLIC COMMENTS/RANTS HAVE PRE-CONDEMNED HIM, which for Moud means the UNSC is already technically "justified" in resorting to [US-led?] mil action to remove him from de facto state power. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-12-26 22:02 |
| #10 Hamas: "and we're stupid enough to do it!" |
| Posted by: jds 2006-12-26 20:18 |
| #9 We have, largely, achieved our goal of convincing Israelis that peace is impossible, it time to start convincing the Americans. |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2006-12-26 19:16 |
| #8 Bring it, assholes. I hear Hyannis is nice this time of year.... |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2006-12-26 15:06 |
| #7 Dude - it's always Dire RevengeTM, heh... |
| Posted by: Raj 2006-12-26 14:37 |
| #6 Are they looking for RevengeTM, or Dire RevengeTM? |
| Posted by: anymouse 2006-12-26 13:59 |
| #5 Just one more reason to let Israel slip its leash and do some truly serious damage. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-12-26 13:54 |
| #4 Again? |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2006-12-26 13:45 |
| #3 ...said 'so-called'? |
| Posted by: Raj 2006-12-26 11:22 |
| #2 Is this article old or new, cause they all read the same. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2006-12-26 10:57 |
| #1 Great idea. Then we can stomp your asses good and proper. |
| Posted by: mojo 2006-12-26 10:55 |