You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
London Times: Israel May Nuke Iran
2007-01-07
This BS was already reported by the fabulist, Seymour Hersch. The report is the product of Peace Now self-loathers who want to forestall any action by Israel against supposed "peace" partners. Peace Now is a surrenderist group, whose members would have broke into Auschwitz rather than raise arms against a Nazi. There is no way that Israeli attack plans would be divulged to anyone. Watch the attacks on Israel from so-called "peace" activists who support the Paleo war on the Jewish people. And if these geniuses had the slightest ability to conduct strategic analyses, they would realize that the job could only be done with heavy nukes. And Qom would go first.
ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons. Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources. The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb. Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout. “As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.
The "source": Peace Now tactical liars.
The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service MossadÂ’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years. Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.
Any US involvement would use Reaganite "fait accompli" tactics. The public will, properly, only hear about whatever is done, in a breaking news report. There will be overwhelming support and the Pelosis will be left crying on the sidelines.
Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.

Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.
More BS; Iran lost over $6 billion in 2006, because they couldn't meet OPEC quotas. The Ayatollahs need every penny they can get. In any case, I would forsee a coup should the leaders prove impotent. And, the Iranian public is well aware of the unearned wealth that the Ayatollahs have given themselves and families, in non-competitive contracts. Rafsanjani is worth over a billion dollars.
Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in IranÂ’s nuclear programme:
Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment

A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels

A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.
The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.
Again, use of accurate missiles that can destroy Israeli power production would destroy Israel. If the Bush regime is not with the program - and they are pushing yet another useless 2-state plan - then they need to be prodded. The Paleo and Ayatollah leaders need to die. Period.
Posted by:Sneaze Shaiting3550 & PlanetDan

#17  #9 Iran's oil production is going down, forever. Iran is led by insane mass murderers. All things considered, the country should not have nukes.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-07 20:07  

#16  The NWT also develops plans and articles for every contingency. It was a slow news day, so they dragged out one of those plans and slapped it on the page of the newspaper in a vain attempt to increase circulation.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-01-07 14:33  

#15  Another “Really?Â…No Shit?” article filled with high drama and conflict. Every nation, even with marginal capabilities, has “Secret Plans” to blow the shit out of any number of other nations that could be perceived as a possible future threat. (PssstÂ….the US has “secret plans” to bomb Pakistan, Saudi, Egypt, Libya, and on and on and onÂ…) That doesnÂ’t equate to desire or intent. All these “plans” were drafted years ago and are constantly being revised as situations evolve. ThatÂ’s what responsible defense departments do and itÂ’s only prudent. IÂ’ll let others speculate on the motivation and timing of this article and itÂ’s “leaked info from anonymous sources” but chances are itÂ’s nothing more then empty bytes for a Sunday Edition.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-01-07 13:14  

#14  There are many advantages to signaling the enemy, which is what this well timed "leak" is intended to do.

Kudos to the Mosad and Israeli leadership on this one.
Posted by: Captain America   2007-01-07 10:52  

#13  As an aside, back during the Lebanon thing, the US took the opportunity to give Israel an s-load of bunker busters, far more than they would ever need for their immediate use.

At the time, the Israelis mentioned that they were working on far more improved versions of BBs. And I'm sure that the US is more than willing to share their new "tunneling missile" tech with Israel.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-01-07 09:25  

#12  The idea any of this is subject to debate is mind-boggling to me. Iran's nuclear program should have been annihilated with twenty-four hours of the the fall of the WTC towers. Once again it is the Jews who are asked to walk ahead of the rest of the flock and all the sheep following behind blaming them for tempting the wolf.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-07 09:25  

#11  Destroying an oil-field or even a shipping point is going to require more than 50's era Soviet theatre missiles.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-07 09:05  

#10  Translation: we don't like Jews, but sometimes they can be useful.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-07 08:59  

#9  Curious. Iran is unable to come anywhere close to meeting its OPEC production allowables, even at very high world oil prices. Why? Are their fields nearing depletion - or merely unmaintained? Are there no new fields to be found - or are they merely unable to effectively look for them?
Depending on the answer, they may actually have a legitimate reason to develop nuclear energy (though not weapons), and the weapon posturing may be in part designed to solicit technical help from America haters.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-01-07 08:27  

#8  Don't need full reserves if you got theatre missile defense. Thems is mobile soze we can move'em around and protect other peoples stuff two. Like oil and wutnot.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-07 03:58  

#7  AH9418:

An effective first strike would cause Iranian military professionals, who are immune to Ahmadinejad jihad bragging, to turn on the Ayatollahs. I don't forsee attacks on third parties.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550   2007-01-07 03:52  

#6  Israel is not the only country that may have a "Samson option." Perhaps those missiles on the south Iranian coast are targeted on the oil shipping points and oil fields not owned by Iran, not on US military assets. If bombs fall on Iran, bombs may fall around the Persian gulf cutting oil production/export by 40%. The rest of the world would know real pain shortly after. Is your Strategic Petroleum Reserve full?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-07 03:31  

#5  The most underestimated emotion in Arab politics is humiliation. The Israeli-Arab conflict, for instance, is not just about borders. Israel's mere existence is a daily humiliation to Muslims, who can't understand how, if they have the superior religion, Israel can be so powerful. Al Jazeera's editor, Ahmed Sheikh, said it best when he recently told the Swiss weekly Die Weltwoche: "It gnaws at the people in the Middle East that such a small country as Israel, with only about 7 million inhabitants, can repeadedly defeat the Arab nation with its 350 million. That hurts our collective ego. The Palestinian problem is in the genes of every Arab. The West's problem is that it does not understand this." Israel fully understands and will deal with it on their own timetable and terms. The nuclear option may simply be the warning against Iranian or Syrian retaliation when the hammer does fall, and it will fall.
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-01-07 03:26  

#4  
Posted by: AzCat   2007-01-07 03:22  

#3  Israelis don't seem to be the kind of folks who would send up a trial baloon let alone signal their punches.

But, hey, keep the hopeful news coming.
Posted by: badanov   2007-01-07 01:56  

#2  Definitely BS. We would only find out about Israel's "plans" after they have been executed. If this was any kind of a leak it was done purposefully - a trial balloon. Done just to gauge everyone's reaction.
Posted by: Intrinsicpilot   2007-01-07 01:33  

#1  I would investigate the sources and the newspaper to see if they are invested long in oil. Everyone knows the reason for these articles is to fluff the price of oil.
Posted by: Penguin   2007-01-07 00:51  

00:00