You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Israel Raid on Iran Could Hurt Environment, Kill Puppies and Kittens
2007-01-09
ENVIRONMENTAL contamination could affect the region if Israel goes ahead with reported plans to attack Iran's uranium enrichment facilities or if there is an earthquake, a Bahraini expert warned yesterday.

However, Bahrain University physics professor Dr Waheeb Alnaser said things could be much worse if Israel decides to attack the power plant in Bushehr. He said alleged plans by Israel to attack facilities in Natanz, Arak and near Isfahan would result in limited damage to the environment. This is because neither the weapons that would be used nor the uranium located there is highly active.

But Dr Alnaser fears that Israel may go even further by attacking Iran's power plant in Bushehr, describing this as a major disaster for the whole region. "I'm not saying there would be no environmental damage from attacking these uranium enrichment plants, but the danger is 100 times worse if they attack an active nuclear reactor - especially after three or four years of operation when the uranium will be highly active," he said.
"It'll make a hell of a mess!"
"Israel hasn't named the plant as one of its targets, but you never know with Israel. War is all about lies, they may say one thing and do another."
Posted by:Anonymoose

#18  A nice comfy cloud of Iran will have a positive effect on our albedo problems.

Not only a solution to our global warming, but it would provide a soft pleasant glow in the evening. Who's got the hazmat data sheet for Iranium?
Posted by: SteveS   2007-01-09 16:28  

#17  Uh no. The winds would carry the radiation to beloved and peace loving Pakistan. Can we call the whole thing off?
Posted by: Paki Foreign Minister   2007-01-09 16:23  

#16  Dr Alnaser said that winds would carry the pollution to the GCC countries, potentially making them uninhabitable.

Ummmm, I'm trying to come up with a downside to this...
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-01-09 16:19  

#15  Count your blessings - nobody is talking Cobalt Bombs.

We're not sayin' nuttin'!

Posted by: Halliburton Weapons Division   2007-01-09 15:22  

#14  The PC situational econutz are so worried about the Iranian environmental state, in mentioning puppies and kittens, they forgot :

BABY DUCKS!
Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-09 14:29  

#13  The environment in Iran is pretty bad now. This BBC article from today states 10,000 have died in Tehran in the past year from air pollution.
"It is a very serious and lethal crisis, a collective suicide," the director of Tehran's clean air committee, Mohammad Hadi Heydarzadeh, told an Iranian newspaper.

"A real revolution is needed to resolve this problem."

He says it better than he knows
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-09 13:51  

#12  So, the good doc is actually giving the Joos the go-ahead to do it now before Bushehr goes hot? Is that what I'ma readin' between the lines?

Naw, I didn't think so either. Go ahead Israel, do it for the environment#&43
Posted by: BA   2007-01-09 13:33  

#11  Yes, but think of the beneficial effect on "global warming". A nice comfy cloud of Iran will have a positive effect on our albedo problems.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-09 11:21  

#10  Â“Dr Alnaser said Iran could have very easily built its nuclear power plant on the Arabian Sea, where there are no countries nearby, but insisted on building it in Bushehr - which is closer to the Gulf countries than it is to Tehran.”

The WMD equivalent to the human shield.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-01-09 10:54  

#9  Besides, Iran only wants nuclear missiles for peacefull civilian power generation.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-01-09 09:38  

#8  Speak for yourself.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-01-09 09:38  

#7  Count your blessings - nobody is talking Cobalt Bombs.
Posted by: 3dc   2007-01-09 08:57  

#6  But iranian nukes fired on Israel? environment?....no never mind
Posted by: Captain America   2007-01-09 08:21  

#5  There will be a lot worse harm to the environment if Iran proliferates nukes. Gotta pick the lesser of two evils.

Would the next stupid concern please step forward?
Posted by: gorb   2007-01-09 02:31  

#4  That would be environmentally sound.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-09 02:18  

#3  And if Iran goes ahead with reported p;lans to annihilate Israel?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-09 02:13  

#2  While an iranian nuke would be environmantally safe.
Posted by: JFM   2007-01-09 02:05  

#1  Look at it this way Doc, it could be worse. They could drop one on you just for practice.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2007-01-09 02:00  

00:00