You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Congress Lines Up Against Bush Plan
2007-01-11
WASHINGTON - (AP)Edited for opposing views President Bush's troop-boosting plan for Iraq was headed straight into a political gale in Congress, with Democrats, some Republicans and an increasingly organized anti-war movement arrayed against the buildup.

Lawmakers were ready to pounce on the plan Thursday during a day of congressional hearings featuring top Bush administration officials such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Leaders of the Democratic-controlled Congress also were considering options for a nonbinding resolution, in the manner of the United Nations to be introduced next week, denouncing the troop increase.

Also Thursday, a coalition of labor, anti-war groups and liberal organizations planned to announce a multimillion-dollar advertising and grass-roots campaign against the commitment of extra troops.

Congressional Democrats and a handful of Republicans promptly criticized the plan as an ill-advised escalation that would further mire the United States in Iraq. Several noted that the president's strategy contradicted the advice of some of his generals.
Not to mention Ted Kennedy.
Gates will face a skeptical audience, particularly from new House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton, D-Mo. In a statement late Wednesday, Skelton dismissed Bush's plan as "three and a half years late and several hundred thousand troops short."

Looking to display party unity, House and Senate Democratic leaders issued a joint statement following the speech, asserting that Bush's plan places an increased burden on a stretched military and "endangers our national security."

In an effort to isolate Bush and his war plan, Democrats planned to seek bipartisan leftist Democrats and leftist RINO's support for a resolution that would place Congress on record opposing the troop increase. That effort, though, also underscored Democratic divisions on whether to undo Bush's plan with tougher legislative measures.

House Republican Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, chided Democrats for offering no alternative to Bush's plan. "If Democrat leaders don't support the president's plan," he said, "it's their responsibility to put forward a plan of their own for achieving victory."
Why would they do that now? They won the election without it.
While Republican House and Senate leaders stood with Bush on Wednesday, other Republican lawmakers bluntly rejected the president's strategy. Among those voicing opposition to the troop buildup were Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Sam Brownback of Kansas, Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.

"This is a dangerously wrong-headed strategy that will drive America deeper into an unwinnable swamp at a great cost," said Hagel, a Vietnam War veteran and potential GOP presidential candidate.
Nothing is unwinnable, Chuck. Our enemies understand that.
Hagel is among the senators Rice will face when she testifies Thursday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The committee is also a perch for a handful of potential Democratic presidential candidates, including Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and committee chairman Joseph Biden of Delaware.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, a longtime opponent of the war, said he feared Bush was setting the stage for a wider regional war. "Isn't one war enough for this president?" he said.
Posted by:Bobby

#25  I use the Index dot HTML site. For a direct link to its HTML entities pages, you can use this.

Remember, some of the more outré characters may not appear in the font a reader is using. Using Unicode escapes is a bit potluck. The hexadecimal escape ℞ is supposed to be the prescription symbol ℞. Most fonts don't include all of Unicode, though. If you don't see it, sorry.

General rule: Use Windows Character Map or the Mac Character Palette to find the symbol you want to type in a Unicode font. Don't choose Zapf Dingbats—choose a Unicode font that includes the dingbat block. Don't make any Rob Reiner jokes either. Get the decimal or hexadecimal value for it. If you have the decimal value, type &# followed by the value followed by a semicolon. Don't type any spaces. If you have the hexadecimal value, type &#x followed by the value followed by a semicolon.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2007-01-11 23:35  

#24  OT here: Is there a general website which lists all the keystrokes needed for the differing codes (like the tm sign)?

There are plenty. This one HERE will get you started. There are also these things called search engines.

I've only heard of them in passing, but I'm told that one can use them to find information on all manner of wonders.
Posted by: Chuck Darwin   2007-01-11 20:38  

#23  Where the f is John Kerry in all of this. I haven't heard a peep about this from him. Methinks its because he's waiting to see which way the polls tell him to go.

Well, he was on FoxNews this morning, but as soon as I saw his face I turned the TV off. So, I can't relate what he said, but I'm sure it was a steaming pile of bovine excrement deeply considered and weighty and soberly reflective.
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-01-11 20:34  

#22  #14 BA: Try these (but in real life, no space between the "&" and what follow):

(most people make the mistake of leaving off the ";" at the end)

& copy; = ©
& reg; = ®
& trade; = ™
& nbsp; = °
& quot; = "
& amp; = &
& lt; = <
& gt; = >
& Agrave; = À
& Aacute; = Á
& Acirc; = Â
& Atilde; = Ã
& Auml; = Ä
& Aring; = Å
& AElig; = Æ
& Ccedil; = Ç
& Egrave; = È
& Eacute; = É
& Ecirc; = Ê
& Euml; = Ë
& Igrave; = Ì
& Iacute; = Í
& Icirc; = Î
& Iuml; = Ï
& ETH; = Ð
& Ntilde; = Ñ
& Otilde; = Õ
& Ouml; = Ö
& Oslash; = Ø
& Ugrave; = Ù
& Uacute; = Ú
& Ucirc; = Û
& Uuml; = Ü
& Yacute; = Ý
& THORN; = Þ
& szlig; = ß
& agrave; = à
& aacute; = á
& aring; = å
& aelig; = æ
& ccedil; = ç
& egrave; = è
& eacute; = é
& ecirc; = ê
& euml; = ë
& igrave; = ì
& iacute; = í
& icirc; = î
& iuml; = ï
& eth; = ð
& ntilde; = ñ
& ograve; = ò
& oacute; = ó
& ocirc; = ô
& otilde; = õ
& ouml; = ö
& oslash; = ø
& ugrave; = ù
& uacute; = ú
& ucirc; = û
& yacute; = ý
& thorn; = þ
& yuml; = ÿ


Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-01-11 20:23  

#21  Ima love alt165_br549 Hiakoo (exclaimer mark)
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-11 20:03  

#20  Let's try that last bit again -- clearly it does work, a little too well! Oh, and thank you, whoever it was. :-)

Or you can let HTML do the work for you. These will supposedly work in any browser using any character set. Remove the space after the &.

¢ - & cent
£ - & pound
¥ - & yen
© - & copy
® - & reg
° - & deg
± - & plusmn
¼ - & frac14
½ - & frac12
¾ - & frac34
ö - & ouml
< - & lt
> - & gt

Posted by: trailing wife   2007-01-11 19:35  

#19  BA, someone posted this here some time ago. I've kept it, even though I'm going to have to progress a great deal in my computer abilities before I'm ready to make use of it. Have fun!

Common computer characters

1) Num Lock ON
2) hold down Alt key and, on the number pad, type 0163:
£


--------------------------
Hold down ALT key and type:
© - 0169 (copyright)
® - 0174 (reg'd trademark)
¢ - 0162 (cents)
£ - 0163 (UK Pound)
¥ - 0165 (Japanese Yen)
« - 0171 (left chevrons)
» - 0187 (right chevrons)
¼ - 0188 (1/4)
½ - 0189 (1/2)
¾ - 0190 (3/4)
ö - 0246 (Shröder)
° - 0176 (degree)
± - 0177 (plus or minus)
² - 0178 (power of 2)
³ - 0179 (power of 3 - cubed)
™ = alt-0153

Or you can let HTML do the work for you. These will supposedly work in any browser using any character set.

¢ - ¢
£ - £
¥ - ¥
© - ©
® - ®
° - °
± - ±
¼ - ¼
½ - ½
¾ - ¾
ö - ö
< - <
> - >

Posted by: trailing wife   2007-01-11 19:28  

#18  I'm not surprised at the list of RINOs, with the exception of Sen. Brownback. WTF is up with him? I almost wonder if he's against the President's plan because it "doesn't go far enough"(tm).

OT here: Is there a general website which lists all the keystrokes needed for the differing codes (like the tm sign)? I remember someone posting how to do the superscript "tm", but I misplaced where I wrote it down.
Posted by: BA   2007-01-11 18:08  

#17  CyberSarge,
That theory has already been tried. When the Rodney King riots started in LA the Police pulled out of the riot areas.
We all remember how wonderfully that turned out.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2007-01-11 17:45  

#16  EU6305 - You're right!

[hangs head in shame]
Posted by: Bobby   2007-01-11 17:44  

#15  Where the f is John Kerry in all of this. I haven't heard a peep about this from him. Methinks its because he's waiting to see which way the polls tell him to go.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-11 17:08  

#14  Bobby and Depot Guy, you forgot Murtha.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-01-11 15:35  

#13  Now that we have a Muslim Congressman we don't even need to be in Iraq. He will protect us. Praise be to Congressman al-Ellison.

/sarcasm
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-11 15:16  

#12  Head on Cyber!
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-01-11 15:04  

#11  You know I was a skeptic at first but lets just go ahead and embrace this Democrat theory and support it everywhere. If fewer troops will make Iraq safer, wont fewer police make L.A., Oakland, Detroit, New Orleans, and DC safer? I would also like to point out an obvious fact that since the invasion of Iraq the LLL and the MSM have be decrying the lack of troops as a reason for lack of progress. I pray to God that some of the adults step in and stop this childish behavior.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-01-11 14:47  

#10  MK, remember rope-a-dope?

If I was George Bush, which I'm not, but if I was, I would be getting pretty tired of the political mudslinging and general mental derrangement on the part of Democritics and the Loony Tunes Left mediasphere in the middle of a war. No matter what I do, it is wrong, stupid, and criminal. Not because it is wrong, stupid, and criminal, but because I'm George Bush.

So if James Carter Baker and Lee Harvey Hamilton and the rest of the Incredibly Senile Geezers™ got together, they could produce a report that would precis everything wrong, stupid, and criminal that I had undertaken in Iraq, with a solution to fix everything wrong, stupid, and criminal. This Illustrated Stupid George™ would contain every criticism made of me, all in one place, to which all the Illuminati Smarter Globalites™ could wave in their International Sercle Gerk.

But the more they wave it around, the more it starts to look like Inedible Smelly Garbage.

Could I, George Bush, be smart enough to create Indefensible Stinking Guidelines™ that actually make my original Invade Saddam Game appear less wrong, less stupid, and less criminal?

Which is why nobody talks about it.

Posted by: john   2007-01-11 13:30  

#9  Several noted that the president's strategy contradicted the advice of some of his generals.
Someone might what to clue in the 'Congress' that Bush is the Commander in Chief of the military. He is not beholden to follow the advice of his generals or every tin-plated 'expert' the media can come up with.

House Republican Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, chided Democrats for offering no alternative to Bush's plan. "If Democrat leaders don't support the president's plan," he said, "it's their responsibility to put forward a plan of their own for achieving victory."

Oh they have a plan - SURRENDER - but they know that their plan is unacceptable unless they cause more and more americans to be killed (by cutting funding..).

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, a longtime opponent of the war, said he feared Bush was setting the stage for a wider regional war.

No - its already a regional war - Iran has been at war with us since 76.

Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-01-11 11:53  

#8  http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20070105/i/r1892836201.jpg?x=380&y=268&sig=N3SGI9zWsKywTUh1Ik986Q--

It's all about MEEEE, baby.
Posted by: Anon4021   2007-01-11 11:46  

#7  ..One thing that has struck me as downright funny (if it wasn't so potentially dangerous) is how the MSM and its political allies presented the ISG report (before its release)as simply the rubber stamp on a retreat that would 'have' to happen, mainly because they said
it would 'have' to happen. It's interesting indeed how after it became clear that the President would NOT meekly follow the ISG's reccomendations, the report has pretty much dropped from the front pages.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2007-01-11 11:40  

#6  I pray that the US kicks ass.
Posted by: Spomort Greling4204   2007-01-11 11:30  

#5  "Among those [Republican] voicing opposition to the troop buildup were Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Sam Brownback of Kansas, Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska."

Other then Olympia Snowe, a RINO who no doubt won reelection in part by her sniping at the Iraq war, what do the others in this group have in common?

Susan Collins:Up for Re-election: 2008

Norm Coleman:Up for Re-election: 2008

Sam Brownback: Announced Presidential bid, Election: 2008

Chuck Hagel: Soon to announce presidential bid, Election: 2008

Hmmm…Most peculiar Mamma.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-01-11 11:17  

#4  I doubt it's that many Mac. It's just that the biggest offenders have the biggest mouths and most press coverage.

Let's start a list: Senators - Kennedy, Kerry, Durbin, Beiden, Reid, Hagel (6)

Representatives: Pelosi, Skelton, Kucinich (3)
Posted by: Bobby   2007-01-11 10:23  

#3  Social War = Popcorn Time!
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-11 10:04  

#2  Just waiting for the Sulla moment myself.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-01-11 09:14  

#1  Question for Rantburgers: how many of the 435 Reps and 100 Sens seriously deserve incarceration for the duration for having provided material aid and assistance to the enemy? My guesstimate is at least 250 Reps and 35 Sens.
Posted by: mac   2007-01-11 09:00  

00:00