You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Guardsmen were forced by ROE to run away leave
2007-01-18
National Guardsmen were carrying loaded M-16s when they were approached by armed men near Sasabe Jan. 3, but they backed off because they were following the idiotic rules agreed upon by the border states and the federal government, the National Guard's top general in Arizona told the Tucson Citizen in a recent interview. They did not flee, said Maj. Gen. David P. Rataczak, commander of National Guard troops in Arizona. "They left because that's what they were taught to do," Rataczak said.
So the individual soldiers are brave enough, but their leadership is craven. Sounds like another country, n'est ce pas?
The guard has three main missions along the border: watching for people or vehicles, manning command posts so Border Patrol officers can work in the field and performing engineering jobs, such as building or repairing fences and roads, Rataczak said. He denied that the guardsmen fled, stating instead that the troops were following rules of engagement signed by governors of the border states, the Border Patrol and the Department of Defense. "Unless they feel personally threatened, they have to leave and walk away and not get into a confrontation with these people, and that's what they did," Rataczak said.

The three guardsmen were approached in the dark by four or five men who came close enough for the guardsmen to talk to them. A language barrier prevented communication, and the guardsmen left their position and called the Border Patrol, Rataczak said. "We do not handle people. We do not arrest people, and we do not detain people. Border patrol is there, we have radio communication with them and they will respond to these types of situations," he said.

The troops called Border Patrol agents, who responded within minutes on foot and in ground vehicles and helicopters. The men who approached the guardsmen were not aggressive and did not raise their weapons, Rataczak said. "The site was under control, our people were under control and, as I said, they were standing off to the side watching the site and watching these people," he said.

The people disappeared in the darkness and were not apprehended. The National Guard has 60-80 such observation posts along the border on any given day. The sites change daily based on intelligence and Border Patrol needs, Rataczak said.

The contact was expected, Rataczak said. "We anticipated this. We knew at some point in the future that someone would eventually approach these sites," he said.
And so you adopted a Run Away policy.
Posted by:Jackal

#7  BSD on the QT, going long on AL.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-18 17:28  

#6  The grand idea of eliminating borders between US/Mexico/Canada. Go see spp.gov. They ardently deny any aspect of this, of course. Meanwhile, all barriers, including barriers to illegals, are being torn down. This really constitutes treason as far as I can comprehend. All this structure is being put in place outside Congress and the knowledge of Americans in general. What percent of US citizens would you imagine favor this if they were aware ?
Posted by: SpecOp35   2007-01-18 16:01  

#5  SPP?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-01-18 15:13  

#4  This comes directly from Bush. Do you realize the two Border Patrol in El Paso who tried to stop a drug dealer bringing in 800 pounds of drugs were sent to jail yesterday for 12 year terms? What did you hear from Bush ? How about that POS Gonzalez ? How about the useless ass wipe Chertoff ? These people, both Guard and Border Patrol, are being directly ordered or inhibited from protecting our border. It comes from Bush in behalf of his SPP concoction. For this and many other backhanded operations, he should be facing impeachment. These actions directly fly counter to the oath of office he swore. This is more than sufficient grounds and needs to be acted upon now to preserve the integrity of our republic. This is an outrage of the largest proportions far surpassing anything Nixon did with regard to Watergate.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2007-01-18 10:52  

#3  "An army of deer led by a lion can defeat an army of lions led by a deer" Napoleon
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-01-18 09:35  

#2  Took them so long to explain why that I don't believe them.
Posted by: Spomort Greling4204   2007-01-18 02:49  

#1  Brings back, not fond, memories of Intifada I.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-18 02:25  

00:00