You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Olde Tyme Religion
Muslims angry at 'bad guy' images
2007-01-26
Popular films ranging from Hollywood blockbusters to children’s cartoons are depicting “crude and exaggerated” stereotypes of Muslims and perpetuating Islamophobia, The Guardian newspaper reported on Thursday, quoting a study.

A report by the Islamic Human Rights Commission argues that films as diverse as The Siege, a portrayal of a terrorist attack on New York starring Denzel Washington and Bruce Willis, the Disney film Aladdin and the British comedy East is East have helped demonise Muslims as violent, dangerous and threatening, and reinforce prejudices, the newspaper report says.

While The Siege is attacked for inter-cutting Islamic ritual and terrorist violence, potentially linking the two in the minds of audiences, Aladdin faces criticism for depicting Arabs as “ruthless caricatures” with “exaggerated and ridiculous accents”.

The study, titled ‘The British media and Muslim representation: the ideology of demonisation’, argues that Hollywood has a crucial role in influencing how the public views Muslims. A survey conducted as part of the research revealed that Muslims in Britain felt negative images of their faith on the big and small screen had consequences in their daily lives. Those interviewed “found a direct correlation between media portrayal and their social experiences of exclusion, hatred, discrimination and violence”.

As well as deep unease with big screen portrayals, the research also found a perception of “unashamed bias” in the media against Muslims, with 62 percent believing the media to be Islamophobic and 16 percent describing it as racist. Only 4 percent considered its representation “fair”.

The authors call for more power for cinema censors to be able to curtail or even decline certification of “objectionable material”, as well as more effective media watchdogs and increased responsibility in coverage of issues involving Muslims on the part of newspapers and television. The report, part of a series produced by the commission - a research and campaigning body - with the backing of the Joseph Rowntree charitable trust, is significant in that it seeks to provide a direct voice for the Muslim community in Britain.

Massoud Shadjareh, spokesman for the commission, said: “Rather than guess what the Muslim community’s needs and aspirations are, it actually comes from the community itself rather than organisations that represent it.”
Posted by:Fred

#32  hell with the hollywood stories,
These pictures used here seem to be the norm for these yahoos. (sorry Yahoo for any close reference heh)
Posted by: Jan from work   2007-01-26 19:39  

#31  Judging by the graphics, perhaps the headline should be:
"Muslims angry at poor dental hygiene."
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-01-26 17:23  

#30  Cross-references are so helpful!

They aid in understanding why things seem to happen....

Bad guys? Stop being bad guys if you don't want to be depicted as bad guys...
Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-26 15:08  

#29  Aladdin faces criticism for depicting Arabs as “ruthless caricatures” with “exaggerated and ridiculous accents”.

Ya mean they didn't like the Sultan's British accent? Boy things are really getting rough...
Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-26 15:03  

#28  BTW : I have seen everything now.

A Russian Webpage on "Team America"

Otryad Amerika


Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-26 14:59  

#27  Aladdin faces criticism for depicting Arabs as “ruthless caricatures” with “exaggerated and ridiculous accents”.

Ohhh jeezÂ…I thought the same ting bout dat Movie Fargo. You betchaÂ…I tink dere onta somthin by golly.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-01-26 14:57  

#26  That guy above looks like the guy in the top picture only he has more teeth....
Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-26 14:51  

#25  As they say in, "Team America:World Police"



Digga Digga Digga Mohammad Jihad.
Posted by: Tell D Truth   2007-01-26 14:50  

#24  Muslims angry at cartoons Miss World Salman Rushdie Ayaan Hirsi Ali Imperialism Islamophobia the letter 'x' Channel 4 women who make them feel funny in their pants 'bad guy' images.
Posted by: Thater Wheresing6094   2007-01-26 13:40  

#23  This is just propaganda. Three Kings, Kingdon of Heaven, Syriana were all pro-arab/muslim movies.

Hollywood spends much more time blasting the U.S. than it does anyone else (although I note that Mel Gibson does like to bash the English).
Posted by: DoDo   2007-01-26 13:02  

#22  moderate muslims had their chance to stand up in western countries and denouce the fanatics. They failed miserably to do so. Now they have to live with the consequences of their actions.

Thier culture makes it very hard for us to be able to tell the fanatics from the sane. And the sane do nothing to help us. I think I speak for most non-Muslims when I say that until we can tell the difference between the moderates and the fanatics - few Muslims will be welcome.

It's their own fault and nobody really cares what the Guardian says anymore anyway. Blah, blah blah.
Posted by: Cholutch Omirong7035   2007-01-26 12:27  

#21  Islamic group claims responsibility for ......

(Insert latest atrocity / bombing / terror attack that Islamic groups will then claim perpetuates
"Islamophobia".)
Posted by: Steven Seagull   2007-01-26 11:44  

#20  If that is an example of anti-Arab propaganda, then I don't know what would satisfy these guys.

Al, I'm sure live video feed from inside the next IED that goes off in Iraq would do. Or, more video of infidels jumping out of that 110-story building on 9/11/01 would do. Or Daniel Pearl being beheaded. The list goes on, but you get the point, I'm sure.
Posted by: BA   2007-01-26 11:09  

#19  Gee... the truth must really hurt.

Here is an idea, assholes. STOP BEING THE BAD GUY!!!!

For more words of wisdom, please visit http://rantburg.com
Thank You.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-01-26 10:53  

#18  I find it hilarious that The Guardian printed this as the number of villians in movies with English accents is easily a hundred times higher than the number of Muslim villians.

For a major religion the Mulsims portray themselves as more sensitive than an eight year old girl. Get over it, idiots.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-01-26 10:47  

#17  As I remember "The Siege" was very pro-Muslim. It justified the terrorism as caused by the "evilAmericans" (one word). The villain in the movie was the US Military (surprise!)

If that is an example of anti-Arab propaganda, then I don't know what would satisfy these guys.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2007-01-26 10:42  

#16  The authors call for more power for cinema censors to be able to curtail or even decline certification of “objectionable material”, as well as more effective media watchdogs and increased responsibility in coverage of issues involving Muslims on the part of newspapers and television.

You know...a whitewash.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-26 10:40  

#15  As well as deep unease with big screen portrayals, the research also found a perception of “unashamed bias” in the media against Muslims, with 62 percent believing the media to be Islamophobic and 16 percent describing it as racist. Only 4 percent considered its representation “fair”.

Well, well. Interviewing Muslims for their opinions on the infidel press and reporting the results as fact? Why don't we ask David Duke his thoughts on racism (or Robert Byrd for that matter). Or, let's ask any LLL Hollyweirdo their thoughts on Bush and Rummy? Quite a study I say.
Posted by: BA   2007-01-26 10:29  

#14  Commentators have discovered another cause of Islamophobia.... wait for it.... da da ...terrorism.
Posted by: tipper   2007-01-26 10:17  

#13  How about an authentic depiction of islam based solely on the aspirations of muslim "holy" men and on the words of their "holy" books. Just tell the censor to overlook the "prophet" taking sex-slaves in battle and raping a nine-year old. We would not want to impose our cultural values after all.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-26 10:12  

#12  Simple questions: How many non-Muslim groups behead prisoners? Now that the IRA and UDF have settled down, how many non-Muslim groups bomb innocent civilians? Other than African tribal feuds, how many non-Muslim groups believe they have the right and the duty to kill or enslave people from other groups?

Given the answers to those questions, rather than complaining about how they are portrayed by Hollywood, muslim Arabs should thank Allah that the rest of the world doesn't eradicate them like vermin.
Posted by: RWV   2007-01-26 09:46  

#11  outnumbered, dammit, no posting pre-coffee jim
gotta remember that
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-01-26 09:44  

#10  You can try, I believe a look at real numbers will quickly convince you that you"re ouynumbered, outgunned, and definately out smarted in every way
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-01-26 09:41  

#9  ...have helped demonise Muslims as violent, dangerous and threatening

So knock it off...or we'll kill you!


We will have to set up a program to overcome Islamophobia, demonisation, exclusion, disempowerment, social isolation, eliminate piggy banks, and implement cultural sensitivity training for police, prosecutors, magistrates, pilots and air crew, doctors, prison warders, teachers and others who show cultural bias towards Islam and Muslims. We do know that Islam is truly the high-water-mark of human achievement, peace, prosperity, spirituality, and all that is uplifting and ennobling.
Posted by: Dave Dimmy   2007-01-26 09:38  

#8  ...have helped demonise Muslims as violent, dangerous and threatening

So knock it off...or we'll kill you!
Posted by: An Angry Muslim   2007-01-26 09:23  

#7  Because NO ONE forms their opinion of Muslims from the real-world actions (and inactions) of Muslims.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-01-26 07:30  

#6  East is East demonised Muslims?! - It provided a sympathetic portrayal of young muslims battling with conservative, elder generations, more like. The IHRC leap into action whenever their precious religion is criticised and the perpetrators are labelled as Islamophobic. Such filmic portrayals are thus offensive whilst leaping up and down in the street calling for the beheading of anyone who disagrees with your fairy story is just fine and dandy. Fecking idiots.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-01-26 06:16  

#5  

There is a big problem in Isalmiststs in the recent history. For a brief period in the past, Muslims helped in the advancements of science.



Very brief. Most of the "muslim" advances were made by dhimmis or were mere transmission to the West of advances made in the preislamic era. Not merely the Greek heritage but also Assyrian and Persian.
Posted by: JFM   2007-01-26 06:09  

#4  Hollywood has a crucial role in influencing how the public views Muslims

Mere words fail...
Posted by: Bobby   2007-01-26 05:57  

#3  There is a big problem in Isalmiststs in the recent history. For a brief period in the past, Muslims helped in the advancements of science. Proud Muslims must try to find what made them a contributor to the knowledge in stead of blaming others for their failure. Once the world became flat, only those who contribute positively will be the winners.
Posted by: Annon   2007-01-26 02:11  

#2  If You Don't Like the Effects, Don't Produce the Cause
-The Wisdom of Funkadelic
Posted by: Free Radical   2007-01-26 01:38  

#1  1. If the shoe fits.......

2. OK, you win! From now on, you will only be judged by your behavour.
Posted by: USMC6743   2007-01-26 00:11  

00:00