You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
NYT Publishes Images of Dying US Soldier
2007-02-02

HT to Malkin and LGF
A photograph and videotape of a Texas soldier dying in Iraq published by the New York Times have triggered anger from his relatives and Army colleagues and revived a long-standing debate about which images of war are proper to show.
Well, that debate may have been revived, but any debate about whether NYT journalists are honorable people has been resolved forever.
The journalists involved, Times reporter Damien Cave and Getty Images photographer Robert Nickelsberg, working for the Times, had their status as so-called embedded journalists suspended Tuesday by the Army corps in Baghdad, military officials said, because they violated a signed agreement not to publish photos or video of any wounded soldiers without official consent.
Inflicting pain on miltary families isn't enough to get your card pulled.. You gotta violate a written agreement.
New York Times foreign editor Susan Chira said Tuesday night that the newspaper initially did not contact the family of Army Staff Sgt. Hector Leija about the images because of a specific request from the Army to avoid such a direct contact.
"And we at the NYT always honor specific requests from the Army."
"The Times is extremely sensitive to the loss suffered by families when loved ones are killed in Iraq," Chira said. "We have tried to write about the inevitable loss with extreme compassion."
I didn't think "extreme compassion" and "unrestrained glee" were compatible emotions, but I guess I don't understand the subtleties of journalism.
Posted by:Matt

#8  These NYT guys and their stringers are the enemy, so treat them like the enemy. Pictures like these are weapons of war, so the photogs are legimate targets, IMHO. A couple of them popped will stop this in a New York Minute™.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-02 22:24  

#7  Whenever a MSM reporter dies in a war zone, you would think they are f*ckin hero. But ask the MSM for a little decency about our military and they don't have an ounce.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-02-02 14:20  

#6  Yesterday's submit had better links.
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-02-02 13:11  

#5  I heard this one Hannity Wed. afternoon. Supposedly the still photos were printed, and the freakin' video posted on their website. Nothing but death pron junkies, like the beheaders.

This p!sses me right off, and I don't even have many military connections (except 1 friend who's in country right now). Supposedly, he was shot in the head. Can't imagine the video was pretty. The DoD should pull ALL NYTimes "passes" ASAP over this! Good gawd, when even my blood boils and I want to shoot the nearest reporter, this is beyond the pale. I'm one of the most calm, level headed people you could meet, but shoot the messenger becomes more and more appealing every day.
Posted by: BA   2007-02-02 12:12  

#4  Shooting the messenger makes a lot of sense. Once again the press scores one for pornography. NYTs is not any different than Al Jazeera--probably worse if anything.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-02-02 08:46  

#3  Even back in the early 90s we had a joke about if you saw a press guy and a enemy who do you shoot first? The press guy, the camera does more damage.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-02 07:59  

#2  Beneath contempt.

Registration is NOT required to contact the editor
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-02 05:59  

#1  Do you want to know what a company does when it is in a death spiral? look at the new york times. Good bye you scum organization.
Posted by: newc   2007-02-02 04:55  

00:00