You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
U.S. retains lead in global patents
2007-02-08
GENEVA: The United States retained its lead as the world's most inventive country in 2006, with a 6.1 percent increase in international patent applications from the previous year, or 34.1 percent of the world total, the World Intellectual Property Organization said in a report Wednesday. But the fastest growth in patent filings came from South Korea and China.

In 2006, a record 145,300 international patent applications were filed under WIPO's Patent Cooperation Treaty, the 136-nation global accord that allows inventors and industry to obtain patent protection in multiple countries. The United States accounted for 49,555 of those.

In 2006, a record 145,300 international patent applications were filed under WIPO's Patent Cooperation Treaty. The United States accounted for 49,555 of those.
About 10.5 percent of the applications were filed in the field of telecommunications, 10.4 percent in pharmaceuticals and 10.4 percent in information technology. The fastest growing areas were semiconductors, up 28 percent, and information technology and pharmaceuticals, both up 21 percent.
The local DeeCee business newspaper reported the Patent and Trademark Office is looking to hire at least 1,200 more patent examiners. They have a backlog of at least 80,000 patent applications.
For some stange reason the Pakistani patent examiners can take long lunches every day.
Francis Gurry, WIPO deputy director- general, said one factor leading to more global filings was an increased emphasis on exports by companies in developing economies. He also cited moves by major conglomerates and individuals to protect their technology assets in a fiercely competitive world economy. "Twenty years ago, approximately 80 percent of the market valuation of a company was in tangible assets and 20 percent in intangibles such as patents. Now it is the reverse," Gurry said.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  I suspect a lot of those patents are on specific proteins and genes and are claimed by universities and pharmaceutical giants.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-02-08 17:01  

#2  Patent and copyright law, to be the stimulus to business they were originally intended, should be more like the General Mining Act of 1872.

It said that anyone could stake a claim anywhere, even on other people's land, but they could only keep that claim if each and every year either the land was "improved" at the cost of a given amount of money, or was mined at a profit. Otherwise, the claim ceased to be valid.

As far as patents and copyrights, they were not meant for companies to hoard and library, but to protect their rights in selling the product or idea. To just sit on a patent and wait for someone else to use it and pay royalties was not the way it was supposed to work.

So by making a "use it or lose it" law for patents and copyright, for example, the big media companies would have to retail their vast libraries of music that they own, but neither sell nor let anyone else sell, or else lose their copyright to it and it would either revert to the composer and performer, or become public domain.

Less popular music, such as classical performances, would have an explosion of marketing when they entered the public domain. The public would be able to buy what they wanted, which is the very essence of the law.

Old and valuable patents and copyrights, like Mickey Mouse, which are worth millions every year to their parent company, would still remain copyrighted as long as they were marketed; even though they have been around for a long time.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-08 13:35  

#1  Ah, yes. Patents which are not recognized by developing countries. Call me crazy, but I like a company's assets to be assets, not freely copyable ideas.

The only ones hurt by patents are our own countries' companies. There are firms which only exist in order to hold patents and thereby deny innovation to other, actually productive, firms.
Posted by: gromky   2007-02-08 00:12  

00:00