You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
NY Times publisher: Goal to manage transition from print to internet
2007-02-08
Despite his personal fortune and impressive lineage, Arthur Sulzberger, owner, chairman and publisher of the most respected newspaper in the world, is a stressed man.

Why would the man behind the New York Times be stressed? Well, profits from the paper have been declining for four years, and the Times company's market cap has been shrinking, too. Its share lags far behind the benchmark, and just last week, the group Sulzberger leads admitted suffering a $570 million loss because of write offs and losses at the Boston Globe.
Sure, blame it on Boston.
As if that weren't enough, his personal bank, Morgan Stanley, recently set out on a campaign that could cost the man control over the paper.

All this may explain why Sulzberger does not talk with the press.

But perhaps the rarified alpine air at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, which ended last week, relaxes the CEOs of the world's leading companies. And what began as a casual chat ended in a fascinating glimpse into Sulzberger's world, and how he sees the future of the news business.
Posted by:gorb

#11  Pinchy goes to a Gypsy who looks up his future in a crystal ball.

"I see numbers, big numbers. I see numbers, big numbers, getting smaller in value. I see numbers winding around a great vortex, going down, down, down. I feel a great tug. Oh MY GOD!!! I am going down into the vortex of numbers, its carrying me down down down. I'm spinning, faster, faster! Numbers everywhere!!!!! I shoot through the bottom of the vortex. I slow down. I see no more numbers. I see marble columns, I see a room with tall doors, benches, tables. I see two numbers only floating in the room, fuzzy. One is.............ah...........an 11, I think, and the other one is a 7. Now the picture is getting fuzzy....and now it is dark. That is all.

$50 please.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-08 20:58  

#10  I'd be curious to know the ranking of news sources linked to by the Burg and other news blogs. I'd guess the NYT is well down the list.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-02-08 19:49  

#9  Yup they're Fucked, I pay for value, accuracy and truth, kinda lets the NYT out all around.
Anyone want to guesstomate just how long they stay online?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-08 17:06  

#8  No, Sulzberger says. If you want to read the New York Times online, you will have to pay.

Then I guess you're still fucked, Pinchy...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-02-08 16:32  

#7  imo, The potential for good 'Internet News' seems to me to hide bound by its former print incarnations.

That said, its mischief, and potential for agit-prop is also untapped too.

Iraq, early Dec. 2006.

NYT correspondent C.J. Chivers, [Marine captain who saw action in the Persian Gulf War]

I like this particular format and the reporter, a photo essay with a narrative by Chris Chivers.

Click on "SNIPERI" first:

new NYT format

Makes any patriot proud as hell eh.. WE have the very best!

*******

The editors for the NYT use remarkable photographs, paired up to a great story-teller reporter who has loads of integrity, and yet still subvert on a regular basis the message inspite of the good material thru a selection process and other means to produce an eventual product with a slant or an agenda.

The NYT has a clear record of its disporportional and slanted Iraq news coverage.

They've run very few successful Mil Ops, and when they have they've riddled them with shit-ass caveats. The NYTs has chosen to hide the thousands of completed infrastructure projects in Iraq. They've chosen to ignore thousands of good stories of Americans helping Iraqi citizens, etc. etc.
Posted by: RD   2007-02-08 14:18  

#6  How many tractors to be produced in this five year plan?
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-02-08 13:23  

#5  Ah, managed decline! It's so... European.
Posted by: Secret Master   2007-02-08 13:11  

#4  Sounds like the opening gambit on negotiations with the Newspaper Guild.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-08 12:46  

#3  "People don't click onto the New York Times to read blogs. They want reliable news that they can trust," he says.

ROFLMAO! Good one, Pinch.

For the record, I dropped my subscriptions to the Boston Glob and Worcester T&G because they are owned by the NYT. Before they were bought by the NYT I was willing to put up with the BS reporting for the grocery coupons in the Sunday paper.
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-02-08 12:42  

#2  He can't give the newspaper away yet he expects people to pay to read it online.
Posted by: Grunter   2007-02-08 11:22  

#1  NY Slimes needs a twelve step program. Step one should be Respecting National Security.
Posted by: doc   2007-02-08 10:30  

00:00