You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US to take in more Iraqi refugees after criticism
2007-02-15
WASHINGTON - The United States aims to accept about 7,000 Iraqi refugees by the end of the year, US officials said on Wednesday as the State Department sought to blunt criticism that it took in only 202 last year. The move, disclosed as US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was to meet U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres, follows sharp questions from US lawmakers about why the United States has welcomed so few Iraqi refugees.

The UNHCR estimates that up to 2 million Iraqis have moved to neighboring countries, mainly Syria and Jordan, before and since the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, while 1.7 million Iraqis are internally displaced.

Since 2003 the United States has taken in fewer than 500 Iraqi refugees, leading congressional Democrats and Republicans to question whether it was doing enough.
We ought to take our fair share, but the goal is to make Iraq a country where the refugees return.
The State Department last week said it had created a government task force to ensure the United States was doing ”its share.” Department spokesman Sean told reporters the United States aimed to take in about 7,000 Iraqi refugees “this fiscal year,” which ends on Sept. 30, 2007. “That’s not a ceiling. That’s kind of a target, everybody’s best guess for where we’ll be,” he added.

US officials later said the processing of the refugees, which include security and medical checks, should be completed by the end of December.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  They are needed in Iraq. The bulk of the country is peaceful outside of Baghdad, let them resettle in a peaceful area and help rebuild their country.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-02-15 18:40  

#2  Why us? Why not the Saudis? One - they don't have to travel as far. Two - it's a similar culture.

However, unlike the subservient Philippinos, the Iraqis might get uppity and take down a few slave owners Sauds. Wonder why that would happen?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-02-15 09:53  

#1  Christian Chaldeans, fine. Joooooooos (if any) fine. Moslems, not so fine.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-02-15 08:45  

00:00