You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Bush's policies draw flak at US-Islamic gabfest
2007-02-20
Strong indictment of some policies of the present US administration, and a call for Islamic reformation were among the observations witnessed at the concluding plenary session of the fourth US-Islamic World Forum yesterday.
The Fourth one? How'd we miss the other three? No one sent me a ticket, and I darned sure never saw an agenda ...
Sudan’s former prime minister Al Sadig AbdulRahman al-Mahdi stated that he could not see any further development regarding dialogue so long as the Bush administration’s policies continued to be the same. “There is ‘mutual demonisation’ between the US and the Islamic world. But ‘Yankeephobia’ is limited whereas ‘Islamophobia’ is widespread,” he explained, while asserting that there has to be a change from the Americans.
Because it's all our fault, you see; Islamic terrorists have been unfairly demonized everywhere in the world.
Referring to the Iranian nuclear imbroglio, the Sudanese leader maintained that Iran is entitled to nuclear technology as 36 other countries. “Iran needs to be policed, but should not be approached with double standards,” he cautioned.
No one argues that Iran can have nuclear power for electricity generation. That's permitted by their signature with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The concern is nuclear weapons, and Mahmoud and Mad Mullahs™ keep doing things that make a reasonable person think that Iran is building those.
Al-Mahdi also raised the need for Islamic reformation. “We Muslims should understand how to deal with the past, modernisation, fanaticism, violence, and good governance among others,” he said.
Almost sounds like an apostate. Wonder what good holy men think of that?
Afghanistan’s former minister of foreign affairs, Abdullah Abdullah observed that his people have gained a lot from the partnership with the US. Pointing at the ‘little understanding’ that exists between the Islamic world and the US, he urged the delegates to take the message from the Forum to their respective countries.

The Washington Post’s columnist David Ignatius was of the view that the US has to take a serious approach to solving the Palestinian problem and shift its focus in Iraq. “There has to be a timetable to end the occupation in Iraq, and shift the focus to the crisis that has developed because of the invasion,” he said.
Thanks for the Democrat point of view, Dave, way to stick up for your country when abroad. And it always revolves around the Paleos, doesn't it.
Ignatius stated that the ‘civil war in Iraq’ has to be curtailed from spreading in the region and the humanitarian crisis addressed. “There is also a need to think about how to protect the region’s oil supplies, talk to the neighbours, and make multilateralism work,” he added.
Because multilateralism has worked so well everywhere it's been tried ...
The Daily Star (Lebanon) editor-at-large Rami Khouri remarked that the severity and direction of negative change in the Middle East in the last five years has become so bad that the region is on the verge of a crisis. “It is taking us back to the post-colonial order of the 1920s. The Middle East is the only part of the world that suffers the ravages of the post-colonial and neo-colonial orders,” he said. Khouri, who was of the view that the present challenges require a much bolder solution, suggested that the Brookings Institution and Qatar should henceforth focus on smaller meetings.
Perhaps that's just what we need, since 1920 is about when the region was altered in ways that made everything worse. Thanks, Mr. Sykes-Picot and Mr. Churchill.
The speaker also observed that the most important process happening in the region is the beginning of the end of impunity for people who use political violence. “The action against Iraq’s Baathist officials and the international tribunal set up by Lebanon to probe Hariri’s assassination are indications in this regard,” he added.
The former being much more successful than the latter so far, not that anyone at the conference would admit that ...
Speaking from the audience, the president of Washington-based Education for Employment Foundation L Michael Hager recommended that the UN and the Alliance of Civilisations have to be involved in the dialogue.
Because you just can't get anything done these days without the involvement of the U.N. ...
Posted by:ryuge

#7  Sykes (British) and Picot (French) were two different people.
Posted by: mac   2007-02-20 20:37  

#6  Bush must be doing it right he pisses off the liberal loonies as well as the mooselimb loonies.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-02-20 19:01  

#5  Again, Bizarro world, with sudanese leaders lecturing the USA about rights and respect and tolerance... named al mahdi too, to add to the dark humor... oh, and was he in charge around the times 2,5 milions south-sudanese were genocided by the gvt??? Or perhaps when UBL lived there? I should check the archives to get references to al turabi and his importance in setting the sunni islamist international, or try to find back that article about the role of sudan in muslim nuke proliferation,... but why bother? Black is white, right is left, up is down,...
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-02-20 10:57  

#4  But ‘YankeephobiaÂ’ is limited whereas ‘IslamophobiaÂ’ is widespread...

Yep. I can just feel the love...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-02-20 08:34  

#3  On another news:

US bombers draw Flak from Germans.
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-20 08:12  

#2  Al-Mahdi also raised the need for Islamic reformation

Like what, denoucing Muhammad's call to kill us?
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-02-20 07:08  

#1  "Gee, what do you want to talk about?"

"I dunno. The usual I suppose."
Posted by: gorb   2007-02-20 05:14  

00:00