You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraqi Terrorists Militants Use Chlorine in 3 Bombings
2007-02-22
Moved to Thursday for further discussion. AoS.
A truck bomb that combined explosives with chlorine gas blew up in southern Baghdad on Wednesday, and officials said it may represent a new and deadly tactic by terrorists insurgents against Iraqi civilians. It was at least the third truck bomb in a month to employ chlorine, a greenish gas also used in World War I, which burns the skin and can be fatal after only a few concentrated breaths. The bomb killed at least two people and injured 32 others, police and medical officials said.
Remind me: aren't chemical weapons against the Geneva Convention?
Iraqi and American officials said the use of chlorine seems aimed at bringing a new level of fear and havoc to Iraq as a new security plan for Baghdad takes shape.
Poison gas is a "weapon of mass destruction," period. Because of the horrific experiences of WWI its use since has been very rare. But Sammy, in company with Chemical Ali and the other Baathists, was one of those extremely rare exceptions.
Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, an American military spokesman, said the attacks highlighted the evolving fluidity of insurgent tactics in Iraq, dominated by militant groups who often notice and mimic attacks that attract the most attention and cause the most suffering. “The enemy is adaptive,” Colonel Garver said. “The enemy wants to win.”
The enemy could also end up a.) sucking a nuke, or b.) touching off a war with Iran and/or Syria. Doctrine calls for use of WMDs to be responded to using WMDs - though not necessarily the same kind of WMDs. If the training and material support comes from outside Iraq, it could easily (and legitimately) be termed a causus belli. These goobers are playing with fire.
The bombing involving chlorine gas on Wednesday followed an explosion on Tuesday north of Baghdad of a tanker filled with chlorine that had been rigged to explode, killing nine people and wounding 148, including 42 women and 52 children.
They're termed "weapons of mass destruction" because they kill people indiscriminately.
At least one other attack with chlorine also took place on Jan. 28, according to the American militaryÂ’s statements.
Once is troubling, twice is maybe coincidence. Three times and you're at the top of the kill list.
Sixteen people were killed in that attack, in the Sunni-dominated Anbar Province, when a dump truck with explosives and a chlorine tank blew up in Ramadi.
So the Sunni terrorists now are using chlorine gas to kill innocents: anyone have any doubts that these same Sunnis would use other weapons of mass killin' if they had the opportunity? Imagine if they got ahold of some of Sammy's old WMD. Imagine if they got ahold of a dirty nuke. Imagine if they got ahold of a NKor bomb. I can imagine it easily, even if John Murtha can't.

This is a point that the Progressive Left and the MSM will ignore, fingers in ears: we've been told that 1) Binny and al-Qaeda can't get weapons of mass destruction, 2) the Iranians will need ten years to get a bomb, and 3) we don't need to worry about a bunch of kooky Muslims in caves, because they couldn't possibly get WMD. That last group just used chlorine gas. Why that? Because it was handy. Wait til Kimmie slips them the bomb. This point has to be pounded, over and over, to the American people: this is who our enemies are, and this is what they'll do if they ever get the chance.
The attacks seem to have been poorly executed, burning the chemical agent rather than dispersing it, but more sophisticated weapons involving chlorine could injure hundreds and cause mass panic.
They know what they want to do, they just don't quite know how to do it. They're experimenting, and when they get it figured the mass casualties will come. The best they've been able to do with booms is about 150 dead. A gas attack in a crowded market might net them two or three times that many, maybe even get them into three digits.
Though it is widely used in water purification and sewage treatment, chlorine is dangerous because it reacts with water in moist tissue, such as eyes and the respiratory tract, to create acid, which essentially burns tissue. A few breaths of air containing chlorine at a thousand parts per million can be lethal.

A few hours after the attack, American Humvees and an American military vehicle with a nozzle that appeared to be testing the air encircled the scene. Soldiers were not wearing masks, but officials at Yarmouk hospital said they determined through interviews and tests that chlorine was the chemical used in the attack.

Brig. Qasim Atta, an Iraqi government spokesman for the new Baghdad security plan, described chlorine attacks as a “filthy way” to target vulnerable Iraqis, especially children.

Colonel Garver said that the chemical attacks could soon appear again. “Its no surprise that anti-Iraqi forces or terrorists or whoever is doing this are trying to replicate this kind of attack,” he said. “They perceive that it’s working.”
Posted by:DanNY

#18  This isn't Chlorine like a bottle of bleech this is Industrial GAS Chlorine. This stuff don't just appear from no were or is made in the basement. This takes a chem/plant.

Where are the Jihadi's getting this? One attack was maybe a hijacked tanker 2,3 thats a supply.
Posted by: C-Low   2007-02-22 23:42  

#17  Chlorine is heavier than air, so it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out where you could use it to kill potentially thousands.

I won't say because I might give someone ideas.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-02-22 22:42  

#16  U.S. military discovers car bomb factory with propane and chlorine
Posted by: Frank G   2007-02-22 19:11  

#15  Waiting for Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to denounce this human rights violation. ... crickets ...
Posted by: DMFD   2007-02-22 18:00  

#14  I think TW asked the right questions. My guess, uneducated as it is, would be that some legitimate business or government operation is currently missing a significant amount of chlorine. If the authorities could find out which one, they might be onto something.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-02-22 15:27  

#13  Repeating an earlier post, how long before a similiar event occurs here in the US? All sorts of trucks are sitting around, loaded for delivery with any number of gaseous agents; clorine, propane, are just two. and there are many sitting in unprotected parking lots / truck stops. a 2 hour head start on a stolen rig could put a big hurt on a metropolitian area. My personal fear is a propane or other flammable truck set ablaze under the Seattle Convention center. That would paralyze the city and I-5 for a long time. if the building came down, the road would be closed for at least a month i am estimating.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-02-22 14:19  

#12  NO WMD,

kill this story by tomorrow
Posted by: MSM editors   2007-02-22 12:18  

#11  And the media gives this no attention at all. This is a big thing. Pure Evil.
The MSM is looking for another big violation of the Geneva convention like placing white lace panties on a terroist's head. OH MY! Can it get more dreadful than that?
I can imagine it easily, even if John Murtha can't. You are correct, Dr. Steve. IMHO, Murtha should be in a nursing home not the House of Representatives.
Posted by: GK   2007-02-22 11:06  

#10  I went to the link, it's the BBC, there's absolutely NO way to Contact them anywhere on page, that says a lot about the BBC's attitude.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-22 11:00  

#9  The bombing involving chlorine gas on Wednesday followed an explosion on Tuesday north of Baghdad of a tanker filled with chlorine that had been rigged to explode, killing nine people and wounding 148, including 42 women and 52 children.

So, if my math's correct, that leaves 54 men wounded. Or was it 54 fluffy bunnies and petunias? I guess we'll know when/if PETA releases a sternly worded letter.
Posted by: BA   2007-02-22 10:54  

#8  And the media gives this no attention at all. This is a big thing. Pure Evil.
Posted by: newc   2007-02-22 10:43  

#7  And the media gives this no attention at all. This is a big thing. Pure Evil.
Posted by: newc   2007-02-22 10:43  

#6  The use of chlorine demonstrates just how desperate these misguide youts are. The footsteps of history are gaining on them.
Posted by: doc   2007-02-22 09:43  

#5  Note how MSM accounts refuse to use terms like "chemical weapon" or "poison gas" in reporting these potentially very significant events. You would never know from this headline that chlorine is in fact a proscribed chemical weapon.
Here is another example from the Associated (with terrorists) Press:
Iraq insurgents again use 'dirty' attack Note the sneer quotes around the term used by an Iraqi army officer and the appalling grammar---- one might use dirty tactics or carry out a dirty attack, but "use dirty attack" is illiterate.

At the same time, the MSM have no trouble suggesting that napalm is a prohibited chemical weapon, though in fact it is not. This meme has reached every level of the leftist constituency. Incidentally, how do I know when a lefty meme has reached saturation level? When I hear it being repeated by illiterate pop-culturists in West Texas.
Five years ago, I outraged local peace dupes and left-beasts by publicly advocating the use of mustard gas and flamethrowers to clean out AQ hideouts in Afghanistan. The enemy's use of poison gas in Iraq gives us a lawful warrant (if such is actually necessary) now for reprisals in kind. It might be quite effective under certain circumstances.
Cook 'em with gas.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-02-22 04:24  

#4  they also hit a police post in Ramadi about two days ago w/1500 lbs of explosives between two trucks. Put a crater in the ground about 15' deep and 40' around. Killed two ISF and two civilians. They were trying to get at the commander of the post but he was not injured.
Posted by: Broadhead6 in Iraq   2007-02-22 04:06  

#3  Where are they getting tanker trucks full of chlorine gas? "Stolen" from the water works, donated by Iran, Baathist leftovers?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-02-22 01:28  

#2  Chemical attacks against civilians? Hey fat Michael Moore! Whaddaya think about your heroic "Minute Men" now? No doubt Amnesty International will be expressing their outrage shortly.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-02-21 22:21  

#1  It's unlikely that 148 people were injured in that one attack. The nice thing about chlorine, and I have "survived" two spills, is that you can smell it very easily. I suspect that most of the people affected smelled the chlorine and got very anxious.

That said, this is a potentially serious complication if the AIF ever manage to disburse it properly. It also highlights the danger we face in the United States merely by being an industrialized nation. We have toxic chemicals in all sorts of transportaion containers all around us. Accidents are common, and an intentional act if executed in the right time and place could be very bad.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2007-02-21 21:33  

00:00