You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Slow Bleed: US Senate Democrats Draft Plan to Revise Military's Iraq Mission
2007-02-25
Democratic Party leaders in the U.S. Senate are working on legislation that would effectively revoke the 2002 resolution authorizing military action against Iraq. Senate Democratic aides say the proposal, which is not expected to be adopted, would limit the U.S. military's mission to training Iraqi troops and police forces, securing the country's borders and combating terrorist forces. Regular combat forces would be withdrawn by next year.

The proposal, drafted by Senator Carl Levin, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and Joseph Biden, who chairs the Foreign Relations panel is set to be presented to other Democratic senators next week. If accepted, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would likely attach the proposal to an anti-terrorism bill. If passed by the Senate, which is not likely, the revised authorization would also have to be passed by the House and would be subject to a veto by President Bush. Democrats and the independents aligned with them hold a slim 51 to 49 majority in the Senate, but hold a more comfortable majority in the House of Representatives.

The 2002 resolution gave President Bush authorization to take military action against Iraq, because of its alleged arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. In a speech last week, Biden said the original resolution is now irrelevant because the WMD program did not exist, and former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein is "no longer there."

The bill is the latest effort by Senate Democrats to challenge President Bush on his Iraq policy. A vote on a non-binding resolution criticizing Mr. Bush's plan to deploy an additional 21,000 troops to Iraq failed in the Senate, but was passed in the House last week.

Meanwhile, Democrats in the House of Representatives are considering a proposal by lawmaker Jack Murtha that would link funding of the U.S. military mission in Iraq to strict conditions on troop readiness and training standards.
Posted by:Fred

#8  WAFF. com > INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE > "7 REASONS TO NUKE THE USA"; + WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM > CHINA NOT ready yet to globally challenge USA. Best to wait for Year 2050 when will be ready economically, militarily, and politically, etc..
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-02-25 23:07  

#7  Shipman,

Allow the demon to rise, arise demon, ARISE, I SAYETH ONTO YOU!

Now, goeth ye forth and inform all that ye shalt encounter!

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-02-25 20:44  

#6  Hell, you know that quote.... DeaconMan found that sez...

Quote from John Kerry, from his December 2003 speech before the Council on Foreign Relations:
"I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election, the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy. Their sudden embrace of accelerated Iraqification and American troop withdrawal dates, without adequate stability, is an invitation to failure. The hard work of rebuilding Iraq must not be dictated by the schedule of the next American election.
I have called for the administration to transfer sovereignty, and they must transfer it to the Iraqi people as quickly as circumstances permit. But it would be a disaster and a disgraceful betrayal of principle to speed up the process simply to lay the groundwork for a politically expedient withdrawal of American troops. That could risk the hijacking of Iraq by terrorist groups and former Ba'athists."
The guy's a veritable fountainhead of integrity, ain't he?

From Powerline back last June.

Ima feel a powerful SPAM Demon in me.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-25 12:47  

#5  Maybe you got it Bobby.

Ima copy down that Kerry crazed quote.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-25 12:44  

#4  Quote from John Kerry, from his December 2003 speech before the Council on Foreign Relations:
"I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election, the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy. Their sudden embrace of accelerated Iraqification and American troop withdrawal dates, without adequate stability, is an invitation to failure. The hard work of rebuilding Iraq must not be dictated by the schedule of the next American election.
I have called for the administration to transfer sovereignty, and they must transfer it to the Iraqi people as quickly as circumstances permit. But it would be a disaster and a disgraceful betrayal of principle to speed up the process simply to lay the groundwork for a politically expedient withdrawal of American troops. That could risk the hijacking of Iraq by terrorist groups and former Ba'athists."
The guy's a veritable fountainhead of integrity, ain't he?
From Powerline back last June.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2007-02-25 10:09  

#3  Nah, youse guys got it all wrong! The Dems are part of the Rovian plan! They've already tricked Tater and his Tots to pull out because of the impending surge.

The smart guys leave - "He that fights and runs away, lives to fight another day."

The dumb guys get chopped up in the Baghdad meatgrinder. Iraq settles down, the Dems declare victory and the troops come home.

By the time Tater comes back, he'll be irrelevant, even in Iraq.

Genius, I tell ya!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-25 07:22  

#2  
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087   2007-02-25 02:53  

#1  Cowardliness, thy name is democrat
Posted by: Captain America   2007-02-25 00:51  

00:00