You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Guantanamo inmate lawyers target Australian govt
2007-02-26
CANBERRA - Lawyers for AustraliaÂ’s only Guantanamo Bay inmate David Hicks launched court action against the Australian government on Monday, arguing senior ministers had failed to ensure a fair trial.

Hicks’ Australian-based solicitor David McLeod asked the Federal Court in Sydney to rule on whether senior lawmakers had breached their ministerial duty by approving trial for Hicks through a US military commission. “In effect the courts are being asked to review the actions of ministers in their dealings with other governments,” McLeod told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

The Australian Federal Court was to rule first on whether it had jurisdiction to hear a case which government lawyers said interfered with ministerial control over foreign affairs. Opening the case, Solicitor-General David Bennett said the government had no legal obligation to protect citizens abroad.

But Hicks’ lawyer McLeod said Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Attorney General Philip Ruddock should have followed the lead of the British government and ensured its citizens were released from Guantanamo Bay. “It’s definitely not a stunt. It’s an opportunity for David’s case to be aired before the courts and for the courts to take a view as to whether or not it has the power and authority to intervene to assist an Australian citizen,” he said.

As the hearing began, six top Australian legal figures wrote a public letter condemning the US military commission process, set up to try Hicks and other detainees. “The fact of the matter is that this is not a regular court, it’s not a properly constituted court and it cannot deliver a fair trial,” group spokesman and former Family Court Chief Justice Alistair Nicholson said.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  I think anybody involved in the David Hicks case, as lawyers, as big-mouthed family members, or in any other capacity, should be locked up in adjoining cells. McLeod is obviously playing for sympathy, knowing good and well that Australia doesn't have to do anything in the Hicks case. Hicks' father is just in a river in Egypt about his son's activities. Hicks himself should be the guest of honor in a good old-fashioned necktie party.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-02-26 13:01  

#2  This is pure obstruction, If you comit a crime in some foreign country, you're tried in that country, by the laws of that country, by the judges, cops, lawyers Etc, of that country. end of frivilous Aappeal".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-26 12:45  

#1  My question is, why do we continue to avoid treating this prisoners as per the Geneva convention and shooting them when captured. It's all perfectly laid out what fate they should receive. And Taliban Davy can't get a lawyer if he's taking a well deserved dirt nap.

In my opinion, the firing squads should use flamethrowers.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2007-02-26 10:59  

00:00