You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Britain switches tactics to undermine the Taliban
2007-02-27
Britain has launched a "reconciliation" drive to undermine support for the Taliban after Whitehall strategists concluded that a decisive military victory in Afghanistan cannot be won, the Guardian has learned. In a significant shift in tactics, senior British officials have stopped talking about winning a war. "We do not use the word 'win'," one said. "We can't kill our way out of this problem."
I dunno, you've been stacking them up pretty well here lately ...
Officials say the new tactics are to identify "Talibs who are sick of fighting" and persuade them to rejoin their tribes and benefit from the human rights laws and state structures being set up in the country. Captured fighters may also be offered alternatives to incarceration, while more deals will be sought with tribal elders.

They hope increasingly to damage the Taliban without relying on a shooting war, a tactic which has often proved counter-productive in the past, notably when Nato air strikes kill civilians. "We are convinced most people do not support the Taliban and want to take a route through it," said one source. British officials distinguish the Taliban from al-Qaida, describing it as a "more fluid" organisation.

Contrasting the Taliban with al-Qaida, a one said: "Al-Qaida's operations are more sophisticated than the Taliban and al-Qaida is very choosy about who they work with."
Boy howdy, there's an insult to the Talibs.
An official familiar with British policy on Afghanistan described the difference this way: "The Taliban is not a homogenous group. It is a mixture of characters - criminals, drug dealers, people out of work. There is a wide variety of different people. The Taliban pays them to carry out these attacks so there are ways to tackle the problem, to split off the disillusioned." He pointed to Hakim Munib, the governor of Oruzgan province in southern Afghanistan, as an example of a former Taliban figure who had left the movement.
All well and good, but persuading some of the Talibs to toss their rods to the ground and come up with their mitts in the air works a little better if they understand that the failure to do so means near-certain death from NATO. It's the 'strong horse' thing again.
British officials are worried about the consequences of US proposals to eradicate Afghanistan's opium poppy harvest, which include spraying the crops from the air, a policy it adopted in Colombia. The fear is that tough anti-narcotic measures now would alienate poor farmers who have no alternative livelihood and drive more Afghans into the hands of the Taliban. Such a policy would further endanger British troops, military commanders say. "The Americans are more impatient than we are," said one official, adding that the immediate priority should be to target and disrupt "convoys and laboratories and medium value drugs traffickers".
And allowing another season of poppies generates a few ka-jillion dollars more for the Taliban. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Let do.
Mr Browne told the Commons yesterday that Britain would deploy four more helicopters and four more Harrier jets to the country, more Warrior armoured vehicles, and multiple-launch rocket systems.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  For about $1B, the US could start a vast public works project in Afghanistan that would be a tidal wave of employment. Literally trying to employ half the country for about a year.

The trick would be to have them doing low skilled improvement projects that would then be "instant real jobs" after they were done. For instance, 100,000 men can turn a large amount of mediocre land into prosperous farmland with canal irrigation, and plant enormous groves of faster growing trees. They can also build housing for those who will occupy the land and be farmers.

If what they have improved will provide jobs for 10,000 to 30,000 people, then they can set them to managing their new farmland for a year, setting up co-ops, getting transportation and markets organized.

Then, what's left of the 100,000 gets more unemployed until it is 100,000 again, and moves on to its next project.

It doesn't have to be in the countryside, either. They can be paid to re-create entire towns and cities. Literally tearing them down and rebuilding them to make them more modern and higher quality. And building much better roads between towns, preparing them for professional road building and paving later.

Such towns could then be set up with micro banks, which are a big hit in India, and a big boon to small business, which is usually the biggest employer in any country.

The rebuilding of the major cities in Afghanistan alone would take a million men. And with some experts in urban design, they would be a lot more efficient as cities than they are now.

The bottom line is to look at the country as a huge reservoir of manpower, and come up with ways to use it that will make jobs a year or two down the road.

Economic development in real democracy is the stake to the heart of both terrorism and organized crime.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-27 09:46  

#3  Officials say the new tactics are to identify "Talibs who are sick of fighting" and persuade them to rejoin their tribes and benefit from the human rights laws and state structures being set up in the country.

I imagine approximately 50% of the population are women. Try arming them and provide them with a feminist/Amazonian interpretation of their holy scrolls. Then it's popcorn time in the 'stan!
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-02-27 09:38  

#2  Need to also cut the funding from Saudi, Pakistan and no doubt Iran!!!!
Posted by: Ebbolump Glomotle9608   2007-02-27 06:11  

#1  Lets do, I agree a little care may be taken when it can be done without much trouble and the Afghani govt/NATO can help the farmers with seed, tools and a contract to buy the alternative crops. Too bad the Afghani Gubmint is more talk than action...eh!
Posted by: RD   2007-02-27 00:45  

00:00