You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Plans To Nuke Europe, US - Sanctions Urged
2007-02-28
By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem ----- February 28, 2007 .... An Israel security official told the Israel News Agency that the recent launch of a missile from Iran into space illustrated a direct threat to both Europe's and US national security.

On February 25, Iran launched a missile reaching space. "Iran has successfully launched its first space missile made by Iranian scientists," the head of Iran's aerospace research center, Mohsen Bahrami, was quoted as saying. On Saturday, Iran Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar said Iran was planning to build a satellite and launcher.

"Iran has no plans to land a man on the moon," Col. Adam an Israeli security source told the INA. "The same technology is used to build intercontinental ballistic missiles. This Iran space launch is not a threat to Israel. The Iranians need not reach a space orbit to attack Israel, but such a high orbit would be needed to deliver a nuclear payload into Europe or the US."
This is a little garbled. Orbit is not required for an ICBM payload. If an object reaches orbital velocity, it is in orbit. If so, it will by definition go all the way around the Earth. It will therefore go halfway around the Earth at something short of orbital velocity. As a very loose rule of thumb, an ICBM's potential orbital payload is about half its weapon throw weight, ie weapons payload.
Iran launched its first satellite, Sina-1, into orbit from a Russian rocket in 2005 and has said it planned to modify its Shahab-3 missile, which Iran says has a range of about 2,000 km (1,250 miles), to launch satellites. Bahrami said the missile was built by his center in cooperation of the Defense and Science Ministries. He gave no further details. Despite announcing what would be a major advance in Iran's missile technology, the news was mentioned only once by the main state TV news channel and was not carried by other Iranian official media.

"Take a look at the news media, you don't see a word about this launch today," said Adam. "Western governments were not prepared for Iran to have a nuclear delivery system up and running. Intel is hard to come by regarding Iran. It is very difficult to have real time Intel coming from Iran as it is difficult for operatives to penetrate Iranian society. Most of our Intel comes from external sources, and these sources are reactive, passive, not proactive."

"If we don't see severe economic sanctions coming from Europe in the next few weeks, we will witness a catastrophe," said a source at the Israel Ministry for Foreign Affairs. The source would not give his name because he would lose his position, but the matter of urgency had him staring at this writer praying to get the message out.

"Iran is no different than Nazi Germany", the MFA source said. "They too built up an army, resources and created the V-2." The V-2 was the first man-made object launched into space, during test flights that reached an altitude of 189 km (117 miles) in 1944. "While Germany was putting the finishing touches to the V-2 which was eventually used against Britain, the world stood by wanting to talk. Now we have Iran repeating history, declaring to "wipe Israel off the map" while planting bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan, one which nearly killed US Vice President Cherney during his visit there a few days ago."

"We have two options. The West can attack Iran which would provoke both Iran and Syria to respond with chemical weapons or we can place immediate and severe sanctions on Iran, thereby reducing their ability to create and use atomic weapons against the West. One should understand Iranian fundamental mentality. These people are not threatening the "infidels" of the West, they are promising to attack as soon as they have both the delivery and nuclear weapons capability."

Security analysts in Europe state that two overriding EU security interests are at stake: avoiding a war with Iran and preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power. These two apparently contradictory interests can be reconciled and translated into a common strategy by adopting a three-pronged approach based on efficient isolation, effective containment, and direct negotiations.

The U.N. Security Council has recently slapped sanctions on Iran that bar the transfer of technology and know-how to Iran's nuclear and missile programs, a move that was pushed for by the West because of fears that Iran is seeking to build atomic bombs. Tehran says its nuclear program is purely civilian and aims to generate electricity. The Iran defense minister was quoted by a newspaper as saying: "Building a satellite and satellite launcher, as well as (previously) launching the first Iranian satellite called Sina with Russian cooperation, and becoming a member of the space club, are part of the Defense Ministry's plans."

It is up to Europe to prevent the two worst developments in Iran - war and nuclear armament - by acting jointly and with determination. Vital European and transatlantic interests are at stake. It is thus Europe's responsibility - and especially Germany's, as the current EU president - to act now.

Iran said yesterday it would never suspend uranium enrichment as demanded by the West, a day after world powers agreed to work on a new UN resolution to pressure Tehran to back down over its nuclear program. Officials from the five permanent UN Security Council members - the United States, France, Russia, China and Britain - plus Germany, who met in London on Monday, also said they were committed to a negotiated resolution to the standoff. The United States, which says "all options" are on the table while insisting it wants a peaceful solution, has ratcheted up pressure by sending a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf.

"Suspending uranium enrichment is an illegal and illegitimate demand ... and it will never happen," Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki was quoted by the official IRNA news agency as saying. Another agency said he backed atomic talks but without preconditions. Iran's open refusal to halt enrichment, a process it insists it only wants to make fuel for nuclear power plants, is echoed by some Iranian officials in private, suggesting the public pronouncements are more than just rhetoric. US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said after the London meeting world powers would hold phone talks on Thursday to discuss elements of a new resolution.

Clearing its stand on the Iran nuclear standoff, China has said that it did not favor the use of sanctions on Iran. Beijing has called for the peaceful resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomatic means. "Sanctions are not the purpose," Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman, Qin Gang said. "Any move of the Security Council should help resolving the issue through peaceful and appropriate means," he said adding hat Beijing's stand on the issue is consistent. "We advocate a peaceful solution through diplomatic negotiation," he added.

China has significant business ties and energy interests in Iran.

"Iran which denies that a European Holocaust ever took place, is now planning to create a second Holocaust in Europe and in the US," said the Israel MFA source. "Europe will be first to feel this nuclear suicide bomb, as London, Moscow, Madrid, Rome and Paris are now in range of Iranian missiles. We no longer have the luxury of time to implement sanctions. This is not a movie. This is not the "24" TV series about nuclear terrorism. This is real. Sanctions worked against North Korea, they can and will work against Iran."

Again, "in space" is a long way from being "in orbit" but if the Shahab-3 has the claimed range, orbital flight is not too far away. For this range, burnout velocity is on the order of M10, 6800 mph. All it will take for orbital flight is a couple more upper stages and a satellite in place of the warhead. Shahab SLV at Encyclopedia Astronautica The only barrier to using this as an ICBM is payload. The intercontinental throw weight is very unlikely to be enough for the kind of bulky nuclear warhead Iran is likely to build in the foreseeable future. It could easily toss such a warhead to Europe however.

Personally, I have a very bad feeling about this. The Euros are fundamentally incapable of taking any effective action against such a good business partner and sanctions are worthless without them. What good that will do when Rome or Munich goes up in mushroom cloud is anybody's guess, but it might be time for folks to read up on fallout hazards and stock up on duct tape and potassium iodide pills here in the States.


Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy

#12  RADIO ISRAEL > Mossad Officio > IDF & Mossad believe IRAN IS READY TO ATTACK AND INITIATE NEW TERROR BOMBING OFFENSIVE AGZ WEST [including USA?], April-May 2007, this time using de facto CBR materials.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-02-28 22:24  

#11  let them save themsleves this time
maybe they will get the picture
Posted by: sinse   2007-02-28 21:15  

#10  Iran Plans To Nuke Europe, US - Sanctions Urged

Truly an Onion worthy headline.
Posted by: ed   2007-02-28 17:23  

#9  Why not just put them in Venezuela?
Posted by: anonymous2u   2007-02-28 16:50  

#8   Orbit - is a nebulous altitude above the earth. Presumable Low Earth Orbit and upwards where we tend to send the shuttle and dump ISS money*.

Orbital Velocity - The difficult to achieve speed that allows an object to stay up in orbit without running the engines all the time. Usually an object at this velocity will circle the Earth every 90 minutes.

It's not all that hard to launch something up to "orbit" but very hard to get it going fast enough to stay. A missile might just suborbital up through the orbital zone and drop back down on target.

*I'm aware that the money is not "dumped" in orbit. It's dumped into Russian and European bank accounts to laundery it and pretend we're paying for the chunks of the ISS they build in the hopes they are not building rockets for the Iranians. A dubious proposition.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-02-28 14:31  

#7  it might be time for folks to read up on fallout hazards and stock up on duct tape and potassium iodide pills here in the States.

AC, I grew up during the era of above ground open air nuclear testing. Still here with all my parts and not suffering from much that can actually be tagged to the exercise. The Iranians are a way off from being able to have anything significant than a 'last great act of defiance' throw before they are removed from the high annoyance list to the 'who?' list.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-02-28 13:18  

#6  This is a little garbled. Orbit is not required for an ICBM payload. If an object reaches orbital velocity, it is in orbit. If so, it will by definition go all the way around the Earth.

And once in orbit, you use a small retro-blast to de-orbit when desired. Range is then unlimited, you can then hit anywhere on earth that you set your initial orbit to pass overhead. "Down" is usualy not a problem.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-28 11:42  

#5  #3: To save Europe a third time, or not. Oh the choices!

I vote "Not" Three strikes and "You're OUT"
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-28 11:35  

#4  A lot more information on the SHAHAB series of missiles, including range charts and throw weights. Use the drop down menu in the upper left to select missile class.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/missile/shahab-5.htm
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-28 09:39  

#3  To save Europe a third time, or not. Oh the choices!
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-28 09:29  

#2  Mike,
No, they will be crawling around, cursing Bush and Israel for not taking stronger action.
Posted by: Rambler   2007-02-28 08:43  

#1  Thanks for the info on space flight and throw-weight, AC.

I can see it now: the EU-niks crawling through the bomb-blasted radioactive slag heap that was once Brussels/Darmstadt/Marseilles/Zurich/take your pick, gasping, "Sanctions! Must . . . impose . . . stronger . . . measures!"
Posted by: Mike   2007-02-28 08:13  

00:00