You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan denies hosting bin Laden, camps
2007-03-01
Pakistan on Wednesday rejected a claim by the U.S. intelligence chief that Osama bin Laden and his deputy were hiding in northwestern Pakistan, and that al-Qaida was setting up camps near the Afghan border. President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, however, acknowledged that foreign militants were in Pakistan's tribal regions along the Afghan border and warned them to leave, the state-run news agency reported. It was not clear from the report whether Musharraf named any particular militants.

Musharraf spoke a day after new U.S. intelligence chief Mike McConnell told a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing that al-Qaida is trying to set up training camps and other operations in Pakistan tribal areas near Afghanistan. "It's something we're very worried about and very concerned about," McConnell said. U.S. intelligence officials believe that bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, were trying to establish an al-Qaida base in the region, he said. McConnell noted the camps are in an area that has never been governed by any state or outside power.

"We deny it," Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao told The Associated Press, referring to McConnell's remarks. Sherpao told The Associated Press there were no al-Qaida training camps in his country and U.S. officials had not provided any intelligence suggesting there were.
Posted by:Fred

#7  gorb, the won't need to worry about supplies. They'll get all they need from Russia and China just like Vietnam did.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-03-01 15:51  

#6  President General Musharraf saw the photos and intelligence information Vice President Cheney brought the other day, and now dares to say Al Qaeda is not in his country and active?!? Is he mad?

No, he's Scared, we need to make him fear us more than he fears Osama, etc.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-03-01 12:10  

#5  If Iran does use Pakistan to stage attacks against US & NATO forces, it will need supply lines. Wouldn't you need supplies for supply lines to work? It seems like they wouldn't have too many places to bomb to eliminate any factories involved, and the long-distance fighting would be no picnic for the fighters.
Posted by: gorb   2007-03-01 06:03  

#4  Whew! Very good points, JosephMendiola. I hadn't thought about the US alliance being protection for Pakistan against rapacious neighbors. Separately, President General Musharraf saw the photos and intelligence information Vice President Cheney brought the other day, and now dares to say Al Qaeda is not in his country and active?!? Is he mad?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-03-01 05:56  

#3  Mushy looks the other way; the real hosts are Qazi's mullahs and the Inter-Service Intelligence jihadis.
Posted by: Sneaze   2007-03-01 02:50  

#2  The Pakis had better understand (1) CHINA vv Officios have overtly proclaimed their country's need for "living space", including water sources; (2) Many Chinese or pro-Chicom Netters have no qualms iff China takes over both PAKISTAN as well as INDIA, etc.; and (3) by not doing anything agz OBL or effectively controlling its own NW areas, the PAK Gubmint is in effect colluding in the wilful future division of their own country, which will NOT help them in LT agz either CHINA OR INDIA. And (4) Iranian medias have reported that Iran post-US attack may choose to retaliate by using the Afghan mountains to attack US-NATO in Afghanistan, which means Iran = Iranian mil units may get geographically closer to Pakistan than Pakistan wants.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-03-01 01:35  

#1  Yeah, whatever.
Posted by: newc   2007-03-01 01:10  

00:00