You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Republicans will attempt to block Jefferson's assignment
2007-03-01
House Republicans plan to break recent precedent and attempt to block a resolution appointing Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) to a spot on the Homeland Security Committee when it comes to the floor for a vote, Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) indicated today. Blunt blasted Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for her endorsement of Jefferson for the Homeland Security Committee, calling the selection "ludicrous."

"I won't support that - it's such a contradiction of what the Speaker said," Blunt told reporters, referring to Pelosi's promise to run the most ethical Congress in history.

The FBI found $90,000 in cash in Jefferson's freezer when they raided his home last year as part of an investigation into whether he accepted bribes related to a telecommunications deal in Africa. Although the FBI probe is ongoing and the congressman has not been indicted, the ethics cloud hanging over Jefferson's head has caused headaches for Pelosi. Pelosi stripped Jefferson of his seat on the powerful Ways and Means Committee last year. That move angered members of the Congressional Black Caucus, who argued that Jefferson had not been indicted or found guilty of any crime and that ousting him from the tax-writing panel created an unfair precedent. Despite the demotion and the ongoing FBI investigation, Jefferson was reelected in November, leaving Pelosi in a quandary about how to handle his committee assignments.

Before the recess, Pelosi announced that Jefferson would be placed on the Homeland Security panel. Jefferson's district includes New Orleans, and he has been an outspoken critic of homeland security agencies' response to Hurricane Katrina.

In an interview with CNN's Larry King, which aired Tuesday night, Pelosi said that after learning about the $90,000 Jefferson stashed in his freezer, she stripped him of his Ways and Means seat. "What I said to my colleague is, you have $90,000 in your freezer, whatever the explanation, you have a problem with me," she told King. Pelosi then said she named Jefferson to the Homeland Security panel because it has jurisdiction over his storm-ravaged district and because the tax-writing panel deals with some of the business and financial issues involved in the allegations against him while the Homeland Security Committee does not.
Posted by:Fred

#10  Anyone who doesn't think P2K is right is nuts. Maine's Governor, for example, makes $70K/year. Hell, when I was sailing we had unlicensed guys with a high school education making that much. We live in a capitalist society, folks, and one of the foundation axioms of such a society is "you get what you pay for." Pay peanuts, get monkeys.
Posted by: mac   2007-03-01 17:22  

#9  Danking70 "How about Culture of Corruption(tm)....."

LMAO! that hit the funny bone, so obvious but funny! pffft politics.
Posted by: RD   2007-03-01 13:16  

#8  Procopius2k makes an excellent point. Last election season, I asked one of my rancher buddies how corrupt he thought his county commissioners were (in Washoe County, Nevada). His answer "What kind of person spends $400,000.00 to get a job that pays $40,000.00 a year?"
Posted by: Secret Master   2007-03-01 11:50  

#7  WHY IS HE STILL A REPRESENTATIVE?

Because we're cheap. We like to believe in fairy tales that good people will put up with the circus that politics is for the republic. Mainly, because we expect them to operate a governmental system that is responsible for a multi-trillion dollar world economy, a massive international security system, dish out multi-billion dollar national programs and offices, and then pay them relatively squat for doing so. And you wonder why they're referred to as the best government money can buy?

For the price of a couple pork programs, we could pay Congress, each SCOTUS justice, and both the Prez and Vice-Prez a clean million a year. And it would still be chump change. If you understand basic capitalism, you'd understand that if you paid such salaries you'd encourage more applicants for the job. You don't think that a mill would be enough to encourage someone to move into his district and actually try to get the job?

But where would be the fun in that? We want our political circus to bitch about a crummy 2 or 3 per cent increase in their pay. It's theater.

We get what we pay for!
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-03-01 08:45  

#6  ...Depending on how this turns out, it could be pretty much the end of the New Order in Congress. If the vote is blocked, it will be clear that the Dhimmis have no intention of cleaning up the place and not only will it be business as usual, it will be worse than usual. If the vote goes through, the Dhimis have a thoroughly rotten choice: vote for Jefferson and be seen as endorsing and rewarding corrupt politicians, or vote against him and defy Madame Speaker.

Popcorn, please....

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2007-03-01 08:22  

#5  WHY IS HE STILL A REPRESENTATIVE?

He's from a black Democrat district. He could be convicted of a crime and be reelected. I grew up in the Detroit area and watched exactly that happen, more than once. Racism wins over virtue.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-03-01 08:16  

#4  The REAL question is ....WHY IS HE STILL A REPRESENTATIVE????? This is more of maddamn pelosis' "let's cleanup washington"
Posted by: ARMYGUY   2007-03-01 07:40  

#3  the guy couldn't pass a security clearance check, so dimwit puts him on the committee in charge. Smart, Nancy. Rub this in their donk faces. They should be ashamed
Posted by: Frank G   2007-03-01 06:27  

#2  The real question here is what's holding up the indictment?
Posted by: PBMcL   2007-03-01 00:16  

#1  If the Dems won't do it, then the Reps. will.

We should brainstorm a good slogan for the Reps. to highlight the Dems. malfeasance.

How about Culture of Corruption(tm).....
Posted by: Danking70   2007-03-01 00:11  

00:00