You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senate GOP turns back Iraq pullout plan
2007-03-16
Democrats aggressively challenged President Bush's Iraq policy at both ends of the Capitol on Thursday, gaining House committee approval for a troop withdrawal deadline of Sept. 1, 2008, but suffering defeat in the Senate on a less sweeping plan to end U.S. participation in the war.
But they lost. Does that mean the Publicans were more aggressive than the Sinners?
Anti-war Democrats prevailed on a near-party line vote of 36-28 in the House Appropriations Committee, brushing aside a week-old veto threat from the administration and overcoming unyielding opposition from Republicans. "I want this war to end. I don't want to go to any more funerals," said New York Rep. Rep. Jose Serrano, one of several liberal Democrats who have pledged their support for the legislation despite preferring a faster end to the war.
"I am just so sensitive!"
"Nobody wants our troops out of Iraq more than I do," countered Rep. C.W. Bill Young of Florida, who sought unsuccessfully to scuttle the timeline for a troop withdrawal. "But we can't afford to turn over Iraq to al-Qaida."
"Buck up, man! Stop sniveling!"
In the Senate, after weeks of skirmishing, Republicans easily turned back Democratic legislation requiring a troop withdrawal to begin within 120 days. The measure set no fixed deadline for completion of the redeployment, but set a goal of March 31, 2008. The vote was 50-48 against the measure, 12 short of the 60 needed for passage. Senate Democrats promptly said they would try again to force a change in Bush's policy beginning next week when they begin work on legislation providing money for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We're so sensitive!"
"Stop sniveling!"

The developments coincided with the traditional St. Patrick's Day luncheon in the Capitol, an annual social event hosted by the speaker of the House and attended by the president.
"FREE BEER!"
For an hour or so, while lawmakers were debating the war, Bush and the leader of the political opposition, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, were seated near one another in an ornate hall not far from the Capitol Rotunda.
Who the hell writes this crap?
Posted by:Fred

#2  Good words, Verlaine, but much too long for a sound bite! In fact, he might've said just what you did, finished off with, "But we can't afford to turn over Iraq to al-Qaida." But that'd be the only thing cited in the MSM.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-03-16 05:43  

#1  I guess it's asking way too much for a war supporter to say something responsible and serious, instead of "me too"-ing on the bizarre and pathetic hysteria for withdrawal. Cong. Young, how about "we're in Iraq for several very good reasons, reasons that are important enough to risk the lives of our troops, who are trained to defend us and our national interests, and if my colleague can't take the heartache and pressure of being a leader in time of war, perhaps he should consider another line of work - but he should be ashamed of himself to even consider turning his back on our bravest who have already made the ultimate sacrifice, on our warriors still in the field, and on our Iraqi and other allies."
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-03-16 02:14  

00:00