| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| The Iraq Surge: Why It's Working ... |
| 2007-03-21 |
| By Gordon Cucullu March 20, 2007 -- 'I WALKED down the streets of Ramadi a few days ago, in a soft cap eating an ice cream with the mayor on one side of me and the police chief on the other, having a conversation." This simple act, Gen. David Petraeus told me, would have been "unthinkable" just a few months ago. "And nobody shot at us," he added. Petraeus, the new commander managing the "surge" of troops in Iraq, will be the first to caution realism. "Sure we see improvements - major improvements," he said in our interview, "but we still have a long way to go." What tactics are working? "We got down at the people level and are staying," he said flatly. "Once the people know we are going to be around, then all kinds of things start to happen." More intelligence, for example. Where once tactical units were "scraping" for intelligence information, they now have "information overload," the general said. "After our guys are in the neighborhood for four or five days, the people realize they're not going to just leave them like we did in the past. Then they begin to come in with so much information on the enemy that we can't process it fast enough." In intelligence work - the key to fighting irregular wars - commanders love excess. And the tribal leaders in Sunni al Anbar Province, the general reports, "have had enough." Not only are the al Qaeda fighters causing civil disruption by fomenting sectarian violence and killing civilians, but on a more prosaic but practical side, al Qaeda is bad for business. "All of the sheiks up there are businessmen," Petraeus said. "They are entrepreneurial and involved in scores of different businesses. The presence of the foreign fighters is hitting them hard in the pocketbook and they are tired of it." A large hospital project - meant to be one of the largest in the Sunni Triangle - had been put on hold by terrorist attacks when al Qaeda had control of the area. Now it's back on track. So are similar infrastructure projects. The sheiks have seen that the al Qaeda delivers only violence and misery. They are throwing their lot in with the new government - for example, encouraging their young men to join the Iraqi police force and army. (They are responding in droves.) Petraeus has his troops applying a similar formula in Baghdad's Sadr City: "We're clearing it neighborhood by neighborhood." Troops move in - mainly U.S. soldiers and Marines supported by Iraqi forces, although that ratio is reversed in some areas - and stay. They are not transiting back to large, remote bases but are now living with the people they have come to protect. The results, Petraeus says, have been "dramatic." "We're using 'soft knock' clearing procedures and bringing the locals in on our side," he notes. By being in the neighborhoods, getting to know the people and winning their trust, the soldiers have allowed the people to turn against the al Qaeda terrorists, whom they fear and loathe. Petraeus says his goal is to pull al Qaeda out "by its roots, wherever it tries to take hold." Another change: an emphasis on protecting of gathering places like mosques and marketplaces. "We initiated Operation Safe Markets," Petraeus said, "and have placed ordinary concrete highway barriers around the vulnerable targets." Car bombings have dropped precipitately - the limited access thwarts them. As a result, "The marketplaces, including the book market that was targeted for an especially vicious attack, are rebuilding and doing great business. It is helping the local economy enormously to have this kind of protection in place." With jobs plentiful and demand growing, the appeal of militia armies declines proportionally. Nor is the Iraqi government simply standing aside and allowing U.S. and Coalition forces to do their work. The Shia prime minister walked the Sunni streets of Ramadi recently, meeting and greeting the people - "acting like a politician," Petraeus said, without malice. "He is making the point with them that he intends to represent all sectors of Iraqi society, not just his sectarian roots." Rules of engagement (ROE), highly criticized as being too restrictive and sometimes endangering our troops, have been "clarified." "There were unintended consequences with ROE for too long," Petraeus acknowledged. Because of what junior leaders perceived as too harsh punishment meted out to troops acting in the heat of battle, the ROE issued from the top commanders were second-guessed and made more restrictive by some on the ground. The end result was unnecessary - even harmful - restrictions placed on the troops in contact with the enemy. "I've made two things clear," Petraeus emphasized: "My ROE may not be modified with supplemental guidance lower down. And I've written a letter to all Coalition forces saying 'your chain-of-command will stay with you.' I think that solved the issue." Are the policies paying off? "King David" as Petraeus is known from his previous tour of duty up near the Syrian border, is cautiously optimistic. "Less than half the al Qaeda leaders who were in Baghdad when this [surge] campaign began are still in the city," he said. "They have fled or are being killed or captured. We are attriting them at a fearsome rate." Virtually everyone who knows him says that David Petraeus is one of the brightest, most capable officers in today's Army. "He is the perfect person for the job," retired Major Gen. Paul Vallely noted. Early signs are positive; early indicators say that we're winning. As Petraeus cautiously concluded, "We'll be able to evaluate the situation for sure by late summer." That's his job. Our job? We need to give him the time and space needed to win this war. Gordon Cucullu is a retired U.S. Army officer and a member of Benador Associates. His book on Guantanamo is due out this fall. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #11 A big part of the key is money. With stability comes rebuilding and rebuilding means jobs and money for lots of people. When people have these things the alure of planting IED's and other mayhem diminishes. When people have these things for a while and get used to them then they are a lot more pissed off when some islamic nut job pulls a stunt that takes their financial security off track. If the power stays on and the water starts to flow and the streets get paved, the hospitals built, etc, etc and the workers are paid to do all of these things then AlQ is screwed. Go General Patraeus! |
| Posted by: remoteman 2007-03-21 18:57 |
| #10 Gromky, if the people are coming forward with tips much more frequently, then any enemy who is hunkered down will eventually get a knock at his door and a search of the grounds for IED parts. I agree that al Q will go underground, but tips will clean up many neighborhoods at the same time. The key is whether peaceful Iraqis will continue to control the streets long after the surge is finished. That is assuming there are peaceful Iraqis. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2007-03-21 15:52 |
| #9 Naw, this is time for a high hard one right under the chin. |
| Posted by: Bob Gibson (stay the fuck away from the plate asshole) 2007-03-21 15:05 |
| #8 The reason the "surge" is working is that the enemy is hunkering down and waiting for the surge to recede. These troops are just staying in the neighborhood for the duration of the surge. When the surge is over, they'll go back to their bases and the terrorism will start all over again. |
| Posted by: gromky 2007-03-21 14:38 |
| #7 Id say something, but its like two, maybe three innnings in, and the other side aint gotten on base yet, and like any baseball fan knows, you dont call attention to that yet. You just look around, and, wonder, and hope. |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2007-03-21 14:18 |
| #6 David Petraeus in '08. I like Dave. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-03-21 09:24 |
| #5 David is a riteous Man. |
| Posted by: newc 2007-03-21 08:59 |
| #4 OS, I read it a long time ago. Twice. Anton Myrer was a very, very good author. |
| Posted by: Groger Gonque7660 2007-03-21 04:35 |
| #3 Changing the ROE and having it be consistent is HUGE. So is getting out in the bush (or the streets in the case of Baghdad and Ramadi, etc) and styaing there. If you keep going back to the rear with the gear, then the opponent will figure it out and so will the people: you leave and they pay the price. You stay, and they might start trusting you. Ship: God's honest truth for that - some dumbass Colonels and LTC's had their own rules and were hamstringing their troops. Mostly frikken control freak "blanket folders", not combat arms men. More Courtney Massengale than Sam Damon. Now that the general has taken those assholes out of the loop, things will get done. And if any of you readers dont know those names, go to the library and get "Once an Eagle" and read it. Every senior NCO and officer that are worth a damn have read it and takenthe lessons there to heart. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2007-03-21 02:27 |
| #2 See also RIGHTNATION/LUCIANNE > BY THE WAY, WE'RE NOT LOSING article. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-03-21 02:23 |
| #1 "My ROE may not be modified with supplemental guidance lower down. And there you have it. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2007-03-21 01:04 |