You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Senator: Some See Impeachment As Option
2007-03-26
EFL
WASHINGTON (AP) - With his go-it-alone approach on Iraq, President Bush is flouting Congress and the public, so angering lawmakers that some consider impeachment an option over his war policy, a senator from Bush's own party said Sunday.

GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a frequent critic of the war, stopped short of calling for Bush's impeachment. But he made clear that some lawmakers viewed that as an option should Bush choose to push ahead despite public sentiment against the war. "Any president who says, I don't care, or I will not respond to what the people of this country are saying about Iraq or anything else, or I don't care what the Congress does, I am going to proceed—if a president really believes that, then there are—what I was pointing out, there are ways to deal with that," said Hagel, who is considering a 2008 presidential run.

The Senate planned to begin debate Monday on a war spending bill that would set a nonbinding goal of March 31, 2008, for the removal of combat troops. On Sunday, Hagel said he was bothered by Bush's apparent disregard of congressional sentiment on Iraq, such as his decision to send additional troops. He said lawmakers now stood ready to stand up to the president when necessary.

In the April edition of Esquire magazine, Hagel described Bush as someone who doesn't believe he's accountable to anyone. "He's not accountable anymore, which isn't totally true. You can impeach him, and before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment. I don't know. It depends on how this goes," Hagel told the magazine. "We have clearly a situation where the president has lost the confidence of the American people in his war effort," Hagel said.

"It is now time, going into the fifth year of that effort, for the Congress to step forward and be part of setting some boundaries and some conditions as to our involvement." "This is not a monarchy," he added, referring to the possibility that some lawmakers may seek impeachment. "There are ways to deal with it. And I would hope the president understands that."
Not too hard to see where things are headed with this, is it?
Posted by:Dave D.

#12  If a sane person runs against Chuckie in the primary under the Dump Hagel banner, they get my contribution.
Posted by: Phineter Thraviger   2007-03-26 21:57  

#11  congress-"creiiters"

cross between critter and cretin?
Posted by: Creremp Sproing2349   2007-03-26 20:48  

#10  Chuckie should check the Constitution. Disagreeing with ambitious congress-creiiters is not grounds for impeachment... more likely grounds for beatification.
Posted by: Creremp Sproing2349   2007-03-26 20:45  

#9  Don't you get tired of all these blow hard pr*cks in DC. They act like they know what the American people prefer.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-03-26 15:36  

#8  The more these clowns undermine the legitimacy of the process the sooner Sulla will arrive without any serious opposition.

Pass the popcorn.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-03-26 13:12  

#7  Was there ever any doubt that impeachement is the ultimate objective?
Posted by: kelly   2007-03-26 12:59  

#6  These guys should all be thrown out after a few terms. After a while they start taking themselves way too seriously.
Posted by: DoDo   2007-03-26 11:18  

#5  "Hagel, who is considering a 2008 presidential run." I doubt that after he got back some polling information that concluded that he and Bin Laden had the same amount of support among registered Republicans. If you ask me Bush has a LONG way before he could be classified as "Imperial" and should be out there attacking this and many other issues (Social Security, Domestic Oil production, etc). If anything he is too soft on the Donks and their willing idiots (Re Hagel and Co.).
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-03-26 10:28  

#4  Hagel's up for re-election in 2008. I hope someone else from the GOP beats this punk in the primaries.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2007-03-26 02:03  

#3  God, what a contemptible idiot Hagel is. Is it asking too much for a single member of Congress to stand up and nuke his illiterate nonsense?

I know the answer.
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-03-26 01:54  

#2  Lest we fergit, didn't a certain Washington Politico argue that a Presidential policy review committee [read-Soviet/Stalinist Amerikan POLITBURO-PRESIDIUM]be formed so that Fascist Emperor Dubya's WOT-ME policies will have to ungo group-style consensus before to any enaction!? ALL TOGETHER NOW, WID FEELING, "THATS A'MIGHTY FASCIST OF YOU COMMUNISTS".
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-03-26 00:57  

#1  Well, it worked for more than 200 years.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-03-26 00:19  

00:00