You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Choir to depict bible hero as a suicide bomber
2007-03-28
VICTORIA - In the Bible, Samson is a hero who used his superhuman strength to do God's will by pulling down pillars in a Philistine temple, killing thousands and himself in an act of vengeance. But in what's sure to be a controversial interpretation of the story, a Victoria choir will next month present Samson as a suicide bomber.
How very "progressive" of them
Drudge yesterday had a link to the video of a lecture at AEI on the subject of "Why Liberals Act That Way." We might even have had a link to it here. The speaker's premise was that Liberals (capital L) train themselves not to discriminate, regarding discrimination as a Bad Thing. I guess the logic would be that if racial discrimination is wrong then every other kind of discrimination is, too. This leads to the development over time of a convoluted thought process that will allow the "thinker" to consistently avoid being caught on the side of right or good.
Simon Capet, music director of the Victoria Philharmonic Choir, says he wanted to update Handel's Samson oratorio to be relevant to today's audiences by drawing comparisons to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.
Obviously it couldn't be relevant to today's audiences by presenting a tale of amour, betrayal, degradation and finally the utter smiting of one's enemies. To do so would involve taking a position on which side was right in the dispute between the Israelites and the Philistines 3000 years ago and, really, we couldn't do that.
"We didn't want to just present the work as a simple morality tale," says Mr. Capet.
"That would be entirely too simple. And moral."
"There is a social and political commentary here that's important."
Because without social and political commentary, it would only be music.
While the music will not change, the setting of the oratorio will be 1946 Jerusalem.
Not, of course, 2004 Jerusalem.
Mr. Capet says he chose the period to draw comparisons to the bombing of the British headquarters at the King David Hotel by the militant Zionist group Irgun in that year. Menachem Begin, who ordered the attack, would later become Israel's prime minister and win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Because having a islamic suicide bomber would be terribly offensive. Not to mention dangerous
Mr. Capet says presenting Samson as a terrorist is not meant to offend anyone or point the finger at one group, but to challenge our notions of what a terrorist is.
That's because our provincial notions of what a terrorist is need challenged, of course. Just regarding them as boomers at bat mitzvahs and market places, or head choppers, or murderers of children in their beds or at school ignores their... ummm... human side.
"Is there any difference between pulling down a pillar or blowing a bomb?" asks Mr. Capet.
Yes.
"Samson killed thousands of people. To show him in the traditional mythological sense does a disservice," Mr. Capet says.
I doubt the Philistines fit thousands of people into the temple/feasting hall. And showing him in the traditional "mythological" sense hasn't been perceived as doing a disservice to anyone (with the possible exception of the Philistines) for the past two or three thousand years.
The choir would not be the first to drawing comparisons between Samson and terrorism. "There's a large focus on this right now, with Israel being presented as the Samson figure," says Andrew Rippin, dean of humanities at the University of Victoria and a specialist in Islamic studies. American journalist Seymour Hersh coined the term "the Samson option" in his book about Israel's development of a nuclear arsenal.

Shadia Drury, a philosophy professor and Canada Research Chair for Social Justice, recently compared Samson to World Trade Center bomber Mohammed Atta in a talk at UVic.
It's that outmoded good-evil thing, y'see. They only look different. Probe beneath the surface and you'll find they're not really that different. Except for the smell.
In her book, Terror and Civilization: Christianity, Politics and the Western Psyche, she argues that terrorism is a biblical problem. "The concept of a collective guilt is a flawed morality," she says.
"So if it's flawed, you might as well chuck it. It's better to go through life with no morality at all than with a flawed morality."
"The idea that 'We're on the side of God and everyone else is evil' has and always will be disastrous."
It assumes the existence of evil, y'see, and to that particular kind of mentality there is no such thing. Everything is shades of gray, and since they're all gray the distinctions among shades can be discarded. Good and evil are relative things, that can be used or discarded as we please. The world becomes remade in the John Lennon image, with no God, no country, "nothing to kill or die for," nothing more important than the solipsist self.
Ms. Drury says she thinks the choir's modern interpretation of Samson -- scheduled to run April 5, 7 and 8--is heroic.
"Not that you should take that description literally. I mean, it's not like they're going to defend right or something."
But local Rabbi Itzchak Marmorstein says comparing Samson and the Irgun bombing will offend Jews and Israelis.
That doesn't matter, of course.
"It's an inappropriate comparison that promotes a shallow understanding of history," says Rabbi Marmorstein. "Israelis never supported Irgun or that kind of terrorism. They weren't heroes ... and Begin went into politics legitimately decades later. He wasn't some crazy terrorist."

One man who is already uneasy about the performance is Samson himself, played by Vancouver Island tenor Ken Lavigne. "I'm really struggling with this," says Mr. Lavigne, 33. "I can't help but feel that a number of people will not enjoy this rejigging of a biblical hero."
Ya think?
Why should the audience's feelings or opinions be taken into account? Since we're non-discriminatory in our outlook, their opinions are no more important than those of the people who don't go to the performance.
Mr. Lavigne says he has warmed up to the idea of putting on an Irgun uniform and wearing a bomb-belt to sing the emotionally charged part since discussing it with Mr. Capet. "Simon wants to get people talking about music and its relevance today," Mr. Lavigne says.
And what's more relevant than a singer in a boom belt?
"In the end I've had to accept that whoever I thought Samson was, what he committed was an act of mass murder."
Posted by:Steve

#17  the Samson cycle

I used to run Army washing machines with that setting.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-28 20:56  

#16  I suppose it is generally thought that that pulling down the pillars was divinely approved. However, that is in no way a universal opinion. There are numerous opinions on Samson. The phrase, "the Lord was with him" or "the spirit of the Lord was with him" does not appear nor anything like it at the moment of the pull down. Furthermore the phrase "the Land had peace for... years" doesn't appear at the end of the Samson cycle. Finally the Samson cycle is followed by several chapters showing the run up to the Benjamite civil war which was certainly a bad event.
Posted by: mhw   2007-03-28 18:55  

#15  But in what's sure to be a controversial interpretation of the story, a Victoria choir will next month present Samson as a suicide bomber.

I trust that when they say, "controversial interpretation", they really mean "perversion".

This is the usual moral equivalency bullshit. Actually, this goes beyond the typical bovine fecal matter to an illegitimate argumentive method called, "tu quoque". It is a form of argumentum ad hominem which seeks to justify wrongdoing by assigning similar conduct to the accuser.

Portraying Sampson as a vest bomber merely seeks to ameliorate the immense and horrific stigma rightfully borne by Palestinians for their use of this heinous practice. There is no other possible significance to attach to this deplorable moral prestidigitation. To cast this sort of rubbish in its best possible light, I'll quote Edith Wharton:

Another unsettling element in modern art is that common symptom of immaturity, the dread of doing what has been done before.
Edith Warton

At best, this is merely an attempt to be different for difference's sake. At worst, this is a scurrilous effort at minimizing or justifying the criminally despicable practices of Palestinian terrorism.

"We didn't want to just present the work as a simple morality tale," says Mr. Capet.

Perish the thought that a morality tale should actually convey the precise moral it was intended to. That would be "old school" and we can all be sure that Capet wants no part of such outdated notions as integrity, ethics or intellectual honesty.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-28 16:08  

#14  First it must be determined if Samson's grievances were Legitimate™.
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-03-28 15:08  

#13  the first paragraph, that is
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-28 13:18  

#12  what Angie Schutz said.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-28 13:18  

#11  Wikipedia ... which can be edited by anyone.

"Mr. Capet says presenting Samson as a terrorist is not meant to offend anyone or point the finger at one group"

Yeah, uh huh... but after hearing for the last few decades that it DOES NOT matter whether you INTEND to offend, I really don't care what Mr. Capet has to say about it. I'm offended, and I demand reparations! That, and the Victoria Philharmonic Choir get rid of their mascot.

Or something like that. (I'm not really good at this yet; maybe I can get a grant in Victim Studies to get better!)
Posted by: eLarson   2007-03-28 12:56  

#10  Why don't he set it in 2007? Have Samson destroy a Gaza cesspool causing massive floods or something?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-03-28 12:20  

#9  it will be edgy when they take on Islam. Until then it is just another bunch of wanna-be's misbehaving because that is the only way they can get attention. How tiresome.

It is a weird quirk in our culture that zero talent and zero skill can pretend to be "art" as long as it steps outside the bounds of decency or taste.

I can vomit on the sidewalk and call it art, but it still stinks.
Posted by: Fester Jomons8988   2007-03-28 12:15  

#8  Not meant to offend...

Attempts to create discussion are always designed to offend someone.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-03-28 11:55  

#7  Accounts pending.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-03-28 11:15  

#6  Huh. As I recall, Samson was betrayed, captured, blinded, enslaved, and then brought to the temple for ritual humiliation. And then he pulled it down. He didn't walk into the temple dressed as a worshipper and pull it down when no one was looking.

Wikipedia has the Samson story. Check especially the part about Samson's wedding to a Philistine woman. Sounds like a typical Palestinian affair. (Although Wikipedia also says the Philistines were Greeks.)
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2007-03-28 11:07  

#5  Oh!.....canada.
Posted by: RWV   2007-03-28 10:55  

#4  Not meant to offend just blur the line between good and evil.

The video, How Modern Liberals Think, that made the rounds yesterday really hit the nail on the head.
Posted by: danking_70   2007-03-28 10:31  

#3  Mr. Capet says presenting Samson as a terrorist is not meant to offend anyone

What a fuktard in the most complete liberal "let's pretend" vein. These are the exact same boneless twits that would shudder at the thought of even looking at a Muhammad cartoon.
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-03-28 10:13  

#2  Vey
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble   2007-03-28 10:13  

#1  
Oy.
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-03-28 10:01  

00:00