You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Another Carrier Group Leaves for the Gulf
2007-03-29
MANAMA (Reuters) - The U.S. navy said on Thursday it had ordered an aircraft carrier to the Gulf to replace one of two patrolling the region, as the United States winds down naval war games on Iran's doorstep.

The Nimitz carrier strike group will sail from San Diego for the Gulf on Monday, a navy spokesman told Reuters, to replace the Dwight D. Eisenhower, as tensions mount between Iran and the West over captured British troops and Iran's nuclear program.

"She (the Nimitz) will deploy to the Gulf region. She is the relief for Eisenhower, who leaves and she replaces her," Lieutenant Commander Jeff Davis said by telephone from Naval Headquarters in Washington.

Strike groups typically include four or five frigates and destroyers and a submarine.

"You are looking at the early part of May that you would have the transition. It would be without any overlap. There is no plan to overlap them at all," he added.
We'll see. I like how he had to say it twice

The Eisenhower and fellow carrier John C. Stennis took part in this week's U.S. war games, the largest in Gulf waters since 2003, when the U.S. led an invasion of Iraq.

The drills, which included anti-submarine, anti-surface and mine warfare drills, end on Thursday. For the first time since the Iraq invasion four years ago, two U.S. aircraft carriers were deployed in the Gulf.

Fifth Fleet spokesman Lieutenant-Commander Charlie Brown said there were currently no plans for more.

"We do not expect to have three carriers in the Gulf region ... but we cannot talk about future needs or future operations," he said.
I'll bet he can't say much
Earlier in the day, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the U.S. not to aggravate tensions with Iran with its naval presence in the Gulf.

Posted by:Intrinsicpilot

#15  But, he's adapted, he now talks like all Marines! Embarrassing to his grandmother!

thanks Sherry, Gods Speed and thanks. ;-)
Posted by: RD   2007-03-29 23:02  

#14  He does indeed have support here, Sherry dear. Wish him happy hunting from us! :-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-03-29 22:21  

#13  oops - accidently hit submit before I had a chance to wish him good luck.
Posted by: Fester Jomons8988   2007-03-29 20:04  

#12  I guess this pretty much answers the question on was this stepped up pressure temporary or just the current notch of ever increasing pressure.

Posted by: C-Low   2007-03-29 20:04  

#11  Bonhomme Richard
Posted by: Fester Jomons8988   2007-03-29 20:02  

#10  Talked with a neighbor the other night. They were headed to CA to hug their young Marine goodbye. He is on the Richard Bonhomme, and I think it is still part of the Nimitz carrier group. They knew he was sailing on Monday.

He said he had been headed for Afghan, but had called last week, and said they were probably going to Iraq.

Funny part, I asked him how the new Marine (in almost a year, straight in from high school (his dream to be a Marine) was enjoying being a Marine.

He's had a hard time -- expected boot camp to be bad, but after that, well, wasn't as much "discipline" as he thought there would be! All smokin', drinkin' cussin' tatooin and roommate always has some chick in his bed!"

But, he's adapted, he now talks like all Marines! Embarrassing to his grandmother!

I sent a hug and words that he had lots of support back home. And not just from his family.
Posted by: Sherry   2007-03-29 19:48  

#9  Maybe by May, the Eisenhower will need re-armament.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-03-29 18:44  

#8  Lieutenant Commander Jeff Davis

SSBN 601 has been stricken from the list. Time to build a new carrier. That way Jeff Davis could says... Waitin for the Robert E Lee
Posted by: Shipman   2007-03-29 18:03  

#7  They're just worried they won't get paid.
Posted by: mojo   2007-03-29 17:54  

#6  Whooooo the Russians warn I am so scared. :P
Posted by: djohn66   2007-03-29 17:52  

#5  I think formerspook or opfor was talking about this not too long ago.

It *IS* a scheduled relief and was preplanned, but the real kicker will be if there will be any overlap.

*crosses fingers*
Posted by: Anon4021   2007-03-29 17:45  

#4  Typical at sea turnover between CVs is a couple of days: gear personnel and face to face meetings. So even if 'no overlap' is scheduled, that 'turnover' should be good for additional puckerations....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-03-29 17:42  

#3  If I were the Mullahs I'd be a lot more concerned about the number of tankers at Diego Garcia than the number of carriers in the gulf.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-03-29 17:42  

#2  I'll bet the MMs are pulling the buttons off their seat cushions about now! :-0
Posted by: gorb   2007-03-29 17:39  

#1  Ensign, set mullah pucker factor to Maximum.

Aye, aye, Sir!
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-29 17:26  

00:00