You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
ElBaradei: Iran is not a nuclear danger
2007-03-31
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said Iran is not a nuclear danger to the world. Speaking to the Arabic-language television Al-Arabiya late on Thursday, Mohamed ElBaradei added, "The problem with Iran's nuclear case is that the country did not report its nuclear activities to the IAEA since it began its program 20 years ago. But, of course, Iran had reasons for not doing so and that was the sanctions imposed on the country. So at that time Iran could not reveal its nuclear program."

Considering as logical Iran's decision to hide its programs during those 20 years, ElBaradei however explained the difficulty the IAEA faced in proving that Iran's activities in all those years were not aimed at the development of nuclear weaponry. "But during the inspections in recent years, we could not find any technical clue or specific evidence that shows Iran's program is of military nature," said the IAEA chief. "This is a significant achievement."

ElBaradei once again underlined that the only way to resolve the misunderstanding in the West over Iran's nuclear program was all-round negotiations, which in turn could lead to finding solutions to the regional security issues as well. "War is not the solution; it is a disaster for the region. If another war breaks out, everything gets messed up," he added.
Posted by:Fred

#11  A little red watchdog with a bushy tail and chicken feathers on his muzzle.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-03-31 21:55  

#10  Hey, show some respect. He's a watchdog, y'know.
Posted by: Punky Crolutch3978   2007-03-31 17:08  

#9  The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said Iran is not a nuclear danger to the world

How would he know?
Posted by: KBK   2007-03-31 15:39  

#8  Stanks a lot, Elbaradei! You guys didn't even know about the program for 20 years, yet you know everything about Iran's intentions.

This guy is full of contridictions.
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087   2007-03-31 11:52  

#7  I prefer Chef.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-03-31 03:16  

#6  There's something about the name "Mohamed". Now if his name was Roger or Kenneth or Derek ElBaradei, it might inspire a bit more confidence in the veracity of his statement.
Posted by: Sonar   2007-03-31 03:06  

#5  A bull with tits would be of greater use than this waste of skin. ElBaradei needs to catch a slug. He is nothing more or less than a terrorist facilitator.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-31 02:41  

#4  But, of course, Iran had reasons for not doing so and that was the sanctions imposed on the country.

El Baradei = apologist for a thug regime
Posted by: Unanter Smith3689   2007-03-31 02:19  

#3  Iran is not a nuclear danger ... yet

Taquiyya.

Is this enough proof that ElBaradei needs to go or does a nuke to go off in NY before people fear for their futures and/or the US more than that which might appear politically incorrect?
Posted by: gorb   2007-03-31 02:01  

#2  FOX this AM > IRAN feared attack by the USA + Britain [NATO] ergo did not reveal aspects of its nucprogs.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-03-31 00:58  

#1  August 1st,2005 Mohammed Javad Larijani told his audience that "It is our right to have nuclear defense and we will not be ready to give up this right..."
Posted by: Flolumble Elmuling1667   2007-03-31 00:17  

00:00