You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Blair facing 'long haul' in quest to free hostages
2007-04-01
See if he can beat 444 days.
TONY Blair was last night facing the prospect of Britain's dispute with the Iranians escalating into an extended hostage crisis, as Tehran refused to rule out the prospect of putting the 15 captured British sailors on trial.

As Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett blasted Iran for "sabre-rattling" over the plight of the seized sailors and marines, senior Downing Street officials admitted that Britain had to prepare for "the long haul". The grim prognosis followed nine days of bitter diplomatic wrangling which has failed to bring an end to the row over Iran's claims that the British personnel had encroached into its waters during a routine patrol in the Shatt al-Arab waterway.

It also raises the possibility that Blair's final days in office could be tarnished by an intractable hostage dilemma similar to the 444-day Iran hostage crisis that blighted Jimmy Carter's US presidency in 1979.

"We want to get these people out as quickly as we can," a senior Blair aide said last night. "That is what we are working towards. But it is not easy and we have to accept that these things take time. We must prepare for the long haul."

The dramatic intervention lays bare the growing distress at the highest levels of the British government over the failure of bilateral and international pressure to achieve a breakthrough that would secure freedom for Faye Turney and her 14 male colleagues.

more at link...
Posted by:Dave D.

#9  We have two issues here:
1. A nation committing an act of piracy and war, contrary to normal international relations.
2. Holding histages.

Allowing any nation to pursue and encourage acts of war brings on more lawlessness, and encourages other thug regimes to do the same. Stopping this criminal behavior in its tracks trumps No. 2.
Britain needs to stop No. 1 now. The hostages in No. 2 are going to hang tough. Britain needs to make clear that any harm coming to their hostages will cause personal harm to the leaders of Iran. Tony Blair must make a speech to the nation about his course of action, which includes the ultimatum to Iran. Ball is in his court. My bets are that Britain talks with the MMs and that is it. The US will keep up the covert pressure in the psyops, insurgent aid, and financial departments.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-04-01 19:06  

#8  It seems to me quite likely that the Brits simply feel they do not have the power on hand to conduct a rescue op.

They wasted their chances for such an op when they a) allowed the kidnapping to be conducted in the first place, b) relied on the "Softly, Softly" diplomacy of their Foreign Ministry to resolve the issue quickly, c) trusted the Iranians to rationally respond to their "Softly, Softly" diplomacy, and d) wasted so much precious time the hostages were able to be transferred to Tehran where their whereabouts are likely uncertain.

The Iranians know we planned a rescue mission for our hostages so they likely will have learned a few lessons about keeping the British hostages separated and in secret locations.

The minute the hostages were moved to Tehran is the minute the brits ran out of any conclusive rescue op capability.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-04-01 18:43  

#7  just like the three year old children they really are would do when an adult says a "Bad Word

Funny, I remember the days when we eagerly learned those "Bad Words" from adults.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-04-01 13:18  

#6  I have this mental image of Moonbats screaming and covering their ears when ENEMY, and HOSTAGE is Written/spoken, just like the three year old children they really are would do when an adult says a "Bad Word".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-04-01 09:31  

#5  Does Britian have any such thing as "Recall Elections"?
Seems to be time.

"We want to get these people out as quickly as we can,"
Liar, unleash the Navy If that's really what you want, Give no warning, then the ENEMY (There, I've said the unspeakable word) Will not have time to move their HOSTAGES, (Bad word again) to your Shelling Target Area
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-04-01 09:01  

#4  Blair should have said his patience in not without limits.
Posted by: Keystone   2007-04-01 08:22  

#3  Congratulations, Mr. Blair. You have offered yourself up for Iranian propaganda exactly as they planned. Yet again, any Dark Ages princeling can make our elected leaders into a puppet.

Those hostages should long since have been declared war dead and our own campaign declared. At this point I would be delighted to see Iranian citizens taken into internment; any random assortment will do. That' the Chicago way.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-04-01 07:41  

#2  Blair, the secondmost liability in WOT.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-04-01 06:37  

#1  That long haul is only because he's come up far too short on the rescuing of his own loyal warriors.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-04-01 01:01  

00:00