You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Mends Fences with Arabs – Starting with Saudis
2007-04-02
DEBKA- salt to taste...
ItÂ’s dated April 2nd but I sure as hell hope to God its a April Fools Article
The live wire at last weekÂ’s Arab League summit in Riyadh was undoubtedly the non-Arab guest of honor, Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki.
He breezed around the Arab delegations hard-selling the notion of a mutual defense treaty between Iran and the Arabs on the lines of the Tehran-Damascus pact. Mottaki argued that a treaty of this kind would allay Arab fears of an Iranian nuclear threat, put a stop to a Middle East nuclear arms race, provide the Arabs with a protective umbrella against Israeli aka American aggression and set up an Arab-Islamic front against US and other foreign intervention in the region.
The Iranian diplomatÂ’s proposition fell on willing ears.

DEBKAfileÂ’s Middle East sources report that he had a long conversation in Riyadh with Saudi foreign minister Prince Saudi al-Faisal, at which they looked the treaty plan in some detail and agreed that their defense ministries would assign special teams to explore it further. The Iranian minister argued that the joint effort of Riyadh and Tehran to pacify Lebanon and reconcile the internal differences among its rival factions could work as well for the Palestinian Authority. He said increasing Saudi-Iranian cooperation in joint diplomatic-strategic projects across the Middle East ought to extend to the military sphere.

Our source also reported exchanges between the Iranian and Egyptian delegations to the Arab summit last week on the resumption of diplomatic ties. Saturday, March 31, Iran’s chief of staff Gen. Hassan Fayrouz Abadi, prodded the Arabs again; he urged them to hurry up and join Iran in a defense treaty because, he claimed, Israel threatened a war offensive in summer, two months hence. According to the Iranian general, Israel was bent on a “suicide assault” against a number of Arab states to save the Americans from having to pull their troops out of Iraq.

Before the conference ended, the Saudi foreign minister arranged a four-way meeting between King Abdullah, Mottaki, and the two Palestinian leaders, Mahmoud Abbas and Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas. Together they discussed how Iran and Saudi Arabia could work together to apply the Mecca reconciliation accords which established a unity government between Fatah and Hamas. This was taken by Iran as RiyadhÂ’s approval of the military assistance Tehran gives the Palestinians and a formal, collective Arab endorsement.

DEBKAfileÂ’s political analysts take this step as a mark of Saudi contempt for Israel, and further, the collapse of the Saudi initiative led by national security adviser Prince Bandar bin-Sultan for direct Saudi-Israeli talks. Instead, the Saudi-Iranian rapprochement led by Saudi al-Faisal has prevailed. The Israel-Palestinian issue has been shifted to the Saudi-Iranian ken by the Faisal faction which has attained ascendancy in Riyadh and argues that the time has come for the Arabs to take their fate in their own hands and drop their dependence on foreign powers, namely the Americans.
This is what happens when you are dealing with a people that hold high honor pride balls, but allow the pansies in your own ranks make you look weak docile and shaky. Your potential allies lose out to those who are against you with the huge middle fence sitters.
DEBKAfileÂ’s sources have learned that talks for the resumption of Egyptian-Iranian diplomatic relations have already begun. Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak entertained for breakfast in Cairo last week Iranian ex-president Muhammad Hatami, who now heads the Institute for Dialogue among Cultures. Present too was Egyptian prime minister Ahmed Natif. Relations were broken off in 1979, the first year of the Islamic revolution, after Ayatollah Khomeini praised the murderers of President Anwar Sadat and a Tehran thoroughfares for one of the assassins, Muhammad Islambouly.

Hatami pressed his host to seriously consider resuming diplomatic relations, maintaining that the Muslim world is beset by a crisis caused by Western domination. Muslim powers must therefore work together to recover control of their own countries. He spoke highly of EgyptÂ’s importance in the Arab and Muslim worlds. By working together, the two governments could make a difference, he said.

After the meal, Hatami and Natif put their heads together and agreed that a high-ranking Iranian delegation would visit Cairo in April to set up arrangements for the two embassies to re-open. The Iranian leader made a similar attempt to restore relations in 2001 when he was president. It broke down when Iranian extremists refused to take down IslambouliÂ’s street name as demanded by Cairo.
Guys if true this is a serious bad development. It may just be the warmonger in me but personally if I was Bush and this was real or even thought to be a possibly reality I would launch a all out strike now not later on Iran. Goal in that strike would be two fold 1) to cause as much damage as possible to their Military, WMD, Leadership, and Government control infrastructure 2) Force Iran to use one of the few counter punches they have against US aka west hit their new friends oil fields, Shia rebellions, pipelines, tankers, cities, refineries.

Either way if this type of negotiation is even going on the US needs to re-establish our being the STRONG horse without doubt. A blockade of Iran or maybe even a pre-threatened cruise missile strike on the one and only Iranian Gas refinery. Either would show just how weak Iran is in comparison to US.

Either way, this story is bothersome especially with statements of late like UAE refusal to allow their territory for Iran action, Saudi King openly calling US occupation of Iraq illegal, Musharaf basically surrendering the entire W of Pakistan to the Taliban/AQ as a base to hit Afghanistan with a Pakistan Nuke umbrella over top, Jordan king recent flirting with Hamas, and more.

Posted by:Omaitch Theagum1555

#8  Shades of Molotov and Ribbentrop.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-04-02 15:35  

#7  Soddy Arabida can buy all the military hardware they can afford (which is a lot), but who's going to operate it? Soddies won't get their hands dirty actually working, and military service is hard work, if it's done right. Nuking Riyadh and Qom would put an end to a lot of the sh$$ going on in the middle east, and cause a lot of folks to rethink their behavior. Even conventional bombing of these two cities, if it destroys the House of Saud and the mullahs, would be sufficient. I consider using nukes because the probability of totally destroying the House of Sh$$ and the idiotsticks in Qom would be considerably higher. It also sends a message that the United States will use whatever is in its arsenal to defeat anyone who make overt or covert war against the United States and its people. Let the velvet gloves come off the iron fist of US military power, and teach these idiots to be afraid, very afraid.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-04-02 14:56  

#6  Sunni don't like Shia. Shia sit atop Iraqi oil, and Saudi oil. Sunni Arabs also sit atop Iranian oil.

If this is true the US should be moving to create a Shia Arab state. Let the Kurds have their independence and the Sunni Iraqi/Sunni Saudi have their sand.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-04-02 13:19  

#5  ItÂ’s been reported that lately the Saudis have been on the largest military spending binge in the history of the kingdom. They might just be hedging their bets but the safe assumption is that this is in response to an increasingly bellicose Iran. The cozy relationship scenario seems like another “Debka [Speculation] Exclusive”.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-04-02 13:00  

#4  /Sarcasm on
I wonder if they will also reconcile their differences over Shia and Sunni sects too.
/Sarcasm off

Probably not...

A reconciliation between Riyad and Tehran would be bad for everyone else not Muslim I imagine, especially from a defense perspective or access to the oil fields for western companies.
Posted by: Delphi2005   2007-04-02 12:33  

#3  KSA probably figures it had better mend fences with Iran since it looks like Iran will be the nuclear big kid on the block pretty soon, and it is clear the (Democratic Peoples Republic of the) USA won't be a reliable defense partner in the future.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-02 08:24  

#2  Step one of Iran getting it's vassals in line perhaps.
Won't do 'em any good.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2007-04-02 07:11  

#1  Those are your allies in WoT (me, I'd wipe Saudia out and then see if Iran is willing to be reasonable)
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-04-02 02:18  

00:00