| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Watching the bad guys kill each other. |
| 2007-04-03 |
| By James S. Robbins A few years ago I ran into a former student of mine, a Marine Lieutenant Colonel who had gone directly from the Command and Staff College to General Franks’s planning staff for Operation Enduring Freedom. I asked him if anything he learned at Quantico helped him fight an actual war — as an educator, I’d like to think we made some contribution. The campaign-planning process perhaps? No, he said, that was largely cookie-cutter stuff; you can pick that up by doing it. But he mentioned that he benefited a great deal from the section we did on Thucydides. I was pleased, being a proponent of more classics in the curriculum — “You already got your grade,” I said, “no need to blow smoke.” But he explained that Afghan warlords behaved the same way the Greek city states did — they were a strictly amoral group with no permanent friends, only permanent interests. Today’s friend became tomorrow’s enemy and the next day’s tomorrow’s ally. The path to success in that part of the world was to keep your eye on the interests involved. This is true with all tribal societies. To operate well in them one must know and understand the patchwork of interests, and see how and when they lead to changes in behavior. Begin with the assumption that long-standing tribes also have long-standing grudges. Lumping the enemy into one category as we often do is counterproductive — by giving them a common adversary we keep them bound together. The key is to wedge them apart, promote disunity, and exploit the preexisting tensions. It is noteworthy in Thucydides that many if not most battles (particularly sieges) are won through acts of betrayal by one faction against another. It is important to know how to create conditions where this dynamic comes into play. It doesn’t mean groups we assist are our friends forever or we condone everything they do. It means that at a specific moment in time, in a specific political situation, interests coincide. We may not even be working together, but we seek the same ends. Take for example Maulvi Muhammed Nazir. A few months ago he was a Taliban commander based in South Waziristan, pledged to establishing sharia law and waging jihad on NATO forces in Afghanistan. A bad guy, right? Well yes he was and still is, but right now he is doing his best to run al Qaeda and the rest of the foreign terrorists out of his portion of Pakistan. Did he switch sides? Decidedly not. He has always been on one side, his own. And what he is doing represents our best chance yet at getting hold of Osama bin Laden. The story starts last November when Nazir was named by the Taliban as their local branch manager in South Waziristan, replacing previous ineffective leader Haji Omar. Nazir had a great record in the company, having gotten his start at entry-level during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. He stayed on to back the Taliban government, and only quit Afghanistan when Taliban resistance crumbled. He went underground for three years in Pakistan, emerging in 2004 after a deal was reached with Islamabad giving tribal leaders a measure of local control. His elevation to management in 2006 was reportedly blessed by Mullah Omar personally. Nazir was well liked locally because he respected Pushtun traditions, and was seen as a moderate (to the extent such terms make sense in this context) because he did not seek battle with Pakistan’s security forces. But he was also a law-and-order leader whose religious adviser issued edicts enforcing strict shariah law. Some Uzbek militants were put to the lash for criminal activity, for example. But Nazir was not content with that punishment; he wanted these and all other foreigners to leave. He and others in the area saw the foreigners as the root of their troubles, particularly the outsiders who grew bored with jihad and turned to crime. The bulk of the foreign fighters (i.e., the Arabs, Uzbeks, Chechens, and others not from around there) came to that part of Pakistan in 2001, and availed themselves of the Pushtun code of ethics known as Pushtunwali. In particular they sought to invoke melmastia (hospitality) and nanwati (sanctuary). The Pushtuns accepted them under these principals. But Nazir believes the guests have overstayed their welcome. He issued an 11-point policy statement on taking over local leadership, which included the expulsion of foreigners. Furthermore the Taliban organization in South Waziristan had been fragmented, and Nazir banned the splinter groups. The response from the troops to this new sheriff in town was mostly negative, and in December the Taliban leadership sought to placate them by mandating that none of Nazir’s decisions could be implemented unless they passed muster with a three-member oversight panel, which included a local Taliban member, an Arab, and an Uzbek. Also the decision to expel foreigners was rescinded. Nazir rightly understood this as a vote of no confidence and soon left the position. Meanwhile other local tribal leaders came out against the presence of foreigners, particularly Uzbeks, and found themselves in trouble. In November 2006 Maulvi Haji Khanan, began opposing the foreigners and was treated to several assassination attempts. Wazir Tribal leader Malik Zarwali, who supported Khanan, was kidnapped, his bullet-riddled body found a short time later. In March a tribal elder and opponent of foreigners named Malik Saadullah Darikhel was attacked and two of his cousins killed. All of this tended to reinforce Nazir’s point that the foreigners were not the most polite guests. The Uzbeks have been particularly rapacious, and are also very important. They number between one and two thousand, and are part of the al Qaeda affiliated Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) are led by Tahir Yuldashev. Yuldashev, who faces a death sentence back in Uzbekistan, is close to Mullah Omar and sits on the Mujahedin Shura Council, the governing body of the movement. He at one time had close ties to Osama bin Laden, who allegedly employs Uzbek bodyguards. The relationship may have cooled — in 2004 a splinter faction emerged, the Islamic Jihad Group, which is centered in North Waziristan, the consensus location of Osama’s hideout. Nevertheless Yuldashev is certain to know a great deal about bin Laden’s organization and security setup. Open fighting between Nazir’s tribal fighters and a combination of foreigners and local Taliban broke out in late March. (Nazir’s people significantly refer to it as a jihad.) About 160 were killed, mostly among the foreigners, who include Uzbeks, Chechens, and various Arab nationalities. Haji Sharif, brother of Haji Omar, sides with Nazir, even as his brother fights alongside the Uzbeks. Pakistan is giving assistance to Nazir, and sending 8,000 troops to the region, primarily to support operations in North Waziristan. Clearly this was bad for business and the Taliban rushed in mediators from Afghanistan. A meeting was brokered, and Nazir set his terms — foreigners could stay if they disarmed and demonstrated good behavior. The terms were rejected. Taliban mediators tried to arrange relocation of the Uzbeks to Helmand Province in Afghanistan, which would be tricky to do — move that large a group with NATO forces looking for them. But the ceasefire broke down March 29 and the fight was back on. On April 1, a tribal jirga declared war on the foreigners, and a fatwa was issued that authorized killing them. Locals who assist foreigners face having their houses burned, a one-million rupee fine (about $16,400), and being expelled from the area. It is open season on Uzbeks and the like. Five thousand tribal fighters have volunteered to join in the struggle, and Pakistani tribesmen are digging foreigners out of their hilltop bunkers and dispatching them without ceremony. The struggle is growing daily, and has the potential to spread to the north, perhaps to threaten the top al Qaeda leaders. Terrorists like al Qaeda may have found safe haven in places like Waziristan, but as this ongoing incident demonstrates they only have sanctuary at the sufferance of the local leaders. And while we may not be able to locate them, the tribal leaders know exactly where they are. At the very least bin Laden must be watching this internecine struggle apprehensively. Perhaps he is readying his escape pod. Make no mistake about Nazir and his crowd, they are still hard-core Islamists who want to impose the worst kind of sharia-based rule on the areas they control. But right now we have a common interest — running the foreigners out of Pakistan. More power to them. One hopes we are preparing welcoming committees for the extremists who run over the border into Afghanistan. And if somehow this battle moves north into the domain where bin Laden is hiding out, if hospitality is withdrawn and he is asked to leave, perhaps finally someone will decide that it would not be a stain on Pushtun honor to turn him in and collect the reward money. And really, why would it be? It has been six years, it’s about time the foreign fighters moved someplace else. Cuba perhaps. |
| Posted by:Steve |
| #8 Or perhaps it was the 18th... before the Revolution, anyway. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-04-03 22:25 |
| #7 European diseases spread like wildfire through the native peoples of the Americas starting with the landing of Columbus on those islands off the coast, and following on the first landing of the Spaniards. One reason we don't know exactly which island Columbus first touch ground is because the natives died off so quickly thereafter. Likewise, the reason the Pilgrims were able to set up shop so quickly is that they landed on the land of a tribe that had completely died off in the years previous. If they'd had to cut down virgin forest it would have taken years to clear enough land to be able to feed themselves... and they weren't the kind of mighty hunters able to live off those skills. I've seen estimates that 75-90% of the native population of North America died of European diseases by the 17th century. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-04-03 22:24 |
| #6 Thank you JFM. Ward Churchill strikes again. |
| Posted by: SR-71 2007-04-03 16:31 |
| #5 The small pox thing is an invention from the commie-LLL in the 60s. In fact teh US had been vaccinating Indians since Thomas Jefferson. |
| Posted by: JFM 2007-04-03 14:20 |
| #4 The key is to wedge them apart, promote disunity, and exploit the preexisting tensions. No, this is a strategy for eternal war. The key is to destroy the economic and social base for these tribal societies. We did it before by distributing small-pox blankets and wiping out the buffalo. |
| Posted by: Excalibur 2007-04-03 13:37 |
| #3 This piece shows a tremendous understanding of the issues at ground zero. perhaps one of the best pieces in a very long time, its not just descriptive of the area in question, but it reveals the trend in all areas in question. |
| Posted by: Kofi Whomomp9641 2007-04-03 10:24 |
| #2 The Things That Wouldn't Leave. Pisses people off after awhile... |
| Posted by: tu3031 2007-04-03 10:10 |
| #1 heh - excellent post, Steve |
| Posted by: Frank G 2007-04-03 09:57 |