You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
" No World Authority Stands against Bullying Powers " Sez Ahmadinejad
2007-04-04
Fars News Agency, the ayatollahs' mouthpiece, offers The Midget's opinion on the British hostage incident. In his shining moment, what object is the focus of the Persian government's gaze? Answer: The UN Security Council.
Ahmadinejad said while western powers enjoy nuclear technology, they strive to block Iran's use of nuclear energy, adding, "The decisions of the UN Security Council regarding Iran's nuclear case show how much they (the Council members) adhere to the rules and laws they themselves have compiled."

"When we object to some UNSC member states, they say that they are under the United States' pressure, but the question is how long they want to go on with adopting decisions under pressures," he continued. "Which government has practiced its veto-wielding right more than others," the president asked. "And in which cases have they exercised their veto right?"

"Have they used it for condemning Iraq's invasion of Iran, or in supporting Iran's nuclear rights, or in support of the rights of the Palestinian and Lebanese nations," Ahmadinejad questioned. "Hasn't the proper time arrived for revising the structure of the UN Security Council so that the Council adopts its decisions on the basis of right and justice?"
Iran's immediate goal is to dissolve alliances and organizations that threaten Persia's imperialist expansion, which will occur under the cover of a nuclear umbrella. The immediate target is the UN, particularly the Anglosphere's contingent. More:
"Hasn't the proper time arrived for revising the structure of the UN Security Council so that the Council adopts its decisions on the basis of right and justice?"

The president reminded that the structure of the UN Security Council was determined after the World War II, "and it was determined in such a way that the US and Britain enjoy full immunity."

"Can any of the UN member states be hopeful about lodging a complaint against the US and Britain at the UN Security Council?

"In the meantime, if these powers have any problems with other countries they raise the issue at the Security Council and condemn such states.

"Today, honor and value of human being are ignored, people's rights are trampled, their lands are usurped and their progress is impeded while there exists no world authority to stand up to the bullying states and defend the rights of the oppressed," he continued.

Ahmadinejad said that the world nations today expect that right and justice form the basis of the UN Security Council decisions. He mentioned, "If the present structure of the Security Council is not revised, then all the UN member states should wait to see their rights being trampled upon."
In other words, the United Nations Security Council as it is now constituted is an illegitimate, repressive organ dominated by the Great and Little Satans. The British sailors and Royal Marines were seized because they were operating under a UN Security Council mandate. Like the tyrants of the 20th century before them, the ayatollahs first attack the sinews that bind the democratic powers. Then the dictators feast upon their helpless neighbors.
Posted by:mrp

#3  So MOUD is making the argument that instead of co-equal Federalism, or already established UNO-specific Confederatism, Moud wants to see more GLOBAL CENTRALIST INTEGRATION/INTEGRATED ORG WHERE THE INFLUENCE AND AGENDA OF THE USA [and only the USA?][But NOT other Large Nation-States?]IS LIMITED OR CONTROLLED??? Moud is complaining about BRITAIN > still considered post-USSR as the symbol + leader of non-US democratic Europe = NATO.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-04-04 22:06  

#2  My thought exactly. It looks as though nobody is prepared to stand up to the bullies. It really is the 1930s again except our enemies are nuclear-armed Dark Ages morons. The Nazis were evil but at least they were a credible enemy. This must be how the Romans felt as they watched a thousand years of accomplishment thrown on the fire.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-04-04 15:48  

#1  For a minute, from reading the headline, I thought he was bragging that no world authority will stop him.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-04-04 15:30  

00:00