| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Construction on Baghdad Barrier Halted |
| 2007-04-23 |
| CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - Iraq's prime minister said Sunday that he has ordered a halt to the U.S. military construction of a barrier separating a Sunni enclave from surrounding Shiite areas in Baghdad after fierce criticism over the project at home. Democracy in action. Do we get credit for this? The challenge to the U.S. initiative came as Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki began a regional tour to shore up support from mostly Sunni Arab nations for his Shiite-dominated government as sectarian violence persists despite a nearly 10-week-old security crackdown. The U.S. military announced last week that it was building a three-mile-long and 12-foot-tall concrete wall in Azamiyah, a Sunni stronghold in northern Baghdad whose residents have often been the victims of retaliatory mortar attacks by Shiite militants following bombings usually blamed on Sunni insurgents. I've been wondering how a wall would protect against mortar attacks. U.S. and Iraqi officials defended plans for the barrier as an effort to protect the neighborhood, but residents and Sunni leaders complained it was a form of discrimination that would isolate the community. A large protest was scheduled for Monday in the area. Great. Another large gathering, another target for terrorists. In his first public comments on the issue, al-Maliki said Sunday that he had ordered the construction to stop. "I oppose the building of the wall and its construction will stop," al-Maliki said during a joint news conference with the secretary-general of the Arab League. "There are other methods to protect neighborhoods, but I should point out that the goal was not to separate, but to protect." Well put. He did not elaborate but added "this wall reminds us of other walls U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver declined to comment on whether construction of the wall would stop, saying only that all security measures were constantly under discussion. "We will coordinate with the Iraqi government and Iraqi commanders in order to establish effective, appropriate security measures," he said. It was not the first time al-Maliki has flexed his political muscle in a bid to force the Americans to back down. Nor the first time he has invoked the Joos card to gain support and to appear Muslimer than thou. In October, U.S. forces pulled down roadblocks around Baghdad's Shiite slum of Sadr City hours after al-Maliki gave the order. The prime minister was said to have feared an explosion of violence among members of the Mahdi Army that is headquartered in Sadr City and was loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. How well did that work? It was not immediately clear if the announcement by al-Maliki in Cairo was part of an effort to win Arab Sunni support. Al-Maliki is said to fear rising support among U.S.-allied Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan for a rumored Iraqi national salvation government led by former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, a favorite of Washington. Quite a mercurial and wicked stick they got there, eh al-Maliki? Just don't forget who your daddy is now. Al-Maliki was told by key Arab leaders in Cairo on Sunday that his government needs to step up reconciliation efforts to include Sunni insurgents if he expects Arab support. Arab diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks, said al-Maliki was told that Arabs will link their support to a package of demands before they give him help. And the Sunnis ought to reciprocate and take advantage of that offer, too. The Sunni Iraqi Islamic Party had denounced the wall's construction earlier Sunday. "Isolating parts of Baghdad with barbed wire and concrete barriers will inflict social and economic damage and it will lead to more sectarian tension," it said. "This measure will harm the residents and it will have a negative impact on the areas instead of solving the problems." No whining when more die, right? Aides to al-Sadr, who had been a key al-Maliki backer but has since withdrawn his support, also criticized the barrier as an "unacceptable" move by the United States, saying they feared Shiite areas in Baghdad like Sadr City would be next. "Hey General Petraeus, whatever shall we do with all these extra barriers we suddenly have?" The military said in a statement earlier this week that U.S. soldiers had begun building the wall to protect the minority community on the eastern side of the Tigris River. When the wall is finished, Azamiyah will be gated and traffic control points manned by Iraqi soldiers will be the only entries, it said, stressing that the decision had been made in coordination with the Iraqis. U.S. and Iraqi forces have long erected cement barriers around marketplaces and coalition bases and outposts in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities to prevent attacks. U.S. forces also have built huge sand barriers around towns such as Tal Afar, an insurgent stronghold near the Syrian border. Sounds like we're gettin' pretty good at it. But many residents were alarmed by the plan, and said they had not been consulted. "This will make the whole district a prison. This is collective punishment on the residents of Azamiyah," Ahmed al-Dulaimi, a 41-year-old engineer who lives in the area, said on Saturday. Why not have several strategic openings with bomb-sniffing dogs and do a body cavity search on anyone who wants through? |
| Posted by:gorb |
| #4 ME NEWS ONLINE > Baghdad Wall first of TEN similar US-proposed barriers; + SYRIA ACQUIRES C-802 MISSLE FROM IRAN. Iran's version of Chinese missle. DEBKA > up to 40 high-ranking Syrian generals on visit to Iran for talks. WAFF.com/DEFENSENEWS > RUSSIA OFFERING SU-32/MIG-35's advanced military aircraft to prospective ME buyers. KOMMERSANT > RUSSIA'S RS-20B MISSLES TO REMAIN PART OF STRATEGIC ROCKET FORCES + Russia's new G5 STRATEGIC BOMBER. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-04-23 23:42 |
| #3 I abjectly apologize for such a blatant redundancy. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-04-23 22:33 |
| #2 traitorous Islamic bastards Zenster grows verbose. |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2007-04-23 20:35 |
| #1 I've been wondering how a wall would protect against mortar attacks. The wall itself wouldn't but choke points could help in interdicting the transportation of such weapons in and out of the enclaves that deploy them. No whining when more die, right? As if! Their whining will be enough to supply Seattle's street art festivals for years. All that's missing is the cheese. Why not have several strategic openings with bomb-sniffing dogs and do a body cavity search on anyone who wants through? That was the idea in the first place. Choke points to limit intramural festivities. Without this barrier in place, it'll be more slaughter as usual. Worst of all is that Coalition troops will undergo increased causalties that otherwise could have been avoided. So long as we're doing all of the heavy lifting in Iraq, there needs to be a modicum of self-interest asserted in these operations. If Iraq wants to play catch-and-release with terrorist suspects that are rounded up, then we have the right to implement measures that further constrain their operations. Until America is willing to override local concerns in order enforce measures necessary for the protection of its own troops we will not be fighting this war in an efficient fashion. Garnering the political cooperation of traitorous Islamic bastards like Maliki has little to do with our long term objectives. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-04-23 19:02 |