You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Navy defends actions in Haditha probe
2007-04-26
NORTH COUNTY -- The Naval Criminal Investigative Service is denying its agents did anything improper when they interrogated Marines in the 2005 slaying of two dozen Iraqi civilians in Haditha. On Tuesday, attorneys representing a senior officer charged in the case, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, asked Navy Secretary Donald Winter for an investigation based on complaints the agents mistreated Camp Pendleton Marines during interviews conducted in Iraq last year.

Ed Buice, a spokesman for the investigative service, has since issued a written statement to the North County Times denying any improper conduct by the Navy's law enforcement agency. "Naval Criminal Investigative Service practices are wholly consistent with legal and constitutional requirements and conform to federal law," Buice said in the statement. Lt. Ryan Perry, a spokesman for Winter's office in Washington, said the complaint from Chessani's attorneys would be examined and that the secretary would have no comment beyond the statement issued by Buice.

The letter sent to Winter's office contends that agents mistreated some of the witnesses and some of those ultimately charged in several ways. Some of the Marines were subject to questioning for as long as 18 hours and denied anything to eat or drink or use the bathroom, according to Chessani's attorneys. Other complaints include accusations that the agents yelled and threw things at the Marines and approached the case from the point of view that crimes had been committed.

Chessani is charged with two counts of dereliction of duty and one count of violation of a lawful order for his role in conducting the initial investigation of what occurred in Haditha. His attorneys say he examined the scene of the killings on the day they took place, Nov. 19, 2005, and again the next day. His report filed with the Marine Corps chain of command in Iraq at the time reflected precisely what he knew, the attorneys say.

A hearing for Chessani is set to take place in a Camp Pendleton courtroom starting in late May. His case will be the first among the seven Haditha defendants to reach court. Three other officers, 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson and Capts. Lucas McConnell and Randy Stone, face similar charges. Three enlisted men, Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and Lance Cpls. Justin Sharratt and Stephen Tatum face murder charges.

The Marine Corps charged the men from Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment on Dec. 21. All the accused maintain they are not guilty. One of the enlisted men originally charged, Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz, saw five homicide counts filed against him withdrawn earlier this month in exchange for his testimony during the upcoming court hearings. As many as seven other Marines, including a first lieutenant, also have been granted immunity.
Case is beginning to smell like ripe fish.
The killings took place after a roadside bomb destroyed a Humvee, killing a lance corporal. None of the slain, who included several women and children, was determined to have been an insurgent.
Posted by:Steve

#4  My surprise meter jumped when i scanned the seattle papers ( on live versions) and there is not one word about this in either one. (ok so i fibbed about the jumping surprise meter; must have been a passing bus)
Posted by: USN. Ret.   2007-04-26 18:22  

#3  Newsmax link
Posted by: gorb   2007-04-26 17:30  

#2  Let's remember the NCIS' high points like, the battleship Iowa case -

"On 19 April 1989, an explosion ripped through the Number Two 16 inch gun turret, killing 47 crewmen. Sailors quickly flooded the #2 powder magazine, likely preventing catastrophic damage to the ship. At first, the NCIS investigators theorized that one of the dead crewman, Clayton Hartwig, had detonated an explosive device in a suicide attempt after the end of an alleged homosexual affair with another sailor. This theory was later abandoned and Hartwig cleared. The cause of the explosion, though never determined with certainty, is generally believed to have been static electricity igniting loose powder.

Testing at Dalhgren, Virginia Naval Surface Warfare Center of powder in the same lot was able to reproduce spontaneous combustion of the powder, which had been originally milled in the 1930's and stored during a 1988 dry-docking of the Iowa in a barge at the Navy's Yorktown, Virginia Naval Weapons Station. Gun powder gives off ether gas as it degrades; the ether is highly flammable, and could be ignited by a spark."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Iowa_%28BB-61%29#1985-2001

Abandoned only after outside pressure forced the reexamination of the particulars. In October 1991, after Congress forced the Navy to reopen the investigation and scientists at Sandia National Laboratories determined that an overram could have caused the blast, the chief of naval operations, Adm. Frank B. Kelso III, publicly apologized to the Hartwig family. He said there was no proof that Hartwig had deliberately detonated the powder bags.

Nifonging in 9...8...7
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-04-26 09:18  

#1  These men have already been found guilty in the court of world opinion. Any result to the contrary by Navy investigation or Court Martial (or even actual helmet camera footage!) will be held as 'yet another example of Administration cover-up.'
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-26 09:00  

00:00