You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Vegans: 0 - Darwin: 1 - Vegan Pair Starve Baby to Death
2007-05-09


Vegans Sentenced to Life for Starving Baby

A vegan couple were sentenced Wednesday to life in prison for the death of their malnourished 6-week-old baby boy, who was fed a diet largely consisting of soy milk and apple juice. Superior Court Judge L.A. McConnell imposed the mandatory sentences on Jade Sanders, 27, and Lamont Thomas, 31. Their son, Crown Shakur, weighed just 3 1/2 pounds when he died of starvation on April 25, 2004. The couple were found guilty May 2 of malice murder, felony murder, involuntary manslaughter and cruelty to children. A jury deliberated about seven hours before returning the guilty verdicts.
Smart jury. This was a case of malice.
Defense lawyers said the first-time parents did the best they could while adhering to the lifestyle of vegans, who typically use no animal products. They said Sanders and Thomas did not realize the baby, who was born at home, was in danger until minutes before he died. But prosecutors said the couple intentionally neglected their child and refused to take him to the doctor even as the baby's body wasted away. "No matter how many times they want to say, 'We're vegans, we're vegetarians,' that's not the issue in this case," said prosecutor Chuck Boring. "The child died because he was not fed. Period."
They might have a defense if "vegan" also meant "retarded". Their actions sure make such a notion possible.
Although the life sentences were automatic, Sanders and Thomas begged for leniency before sentencing. Sanders urged the judge to look past his "perception" of the couple. "I loved my son - and I did not starve him," she said.
Horseshit. The article makes no mention of the child being premature, so I doubt his birth weight was three puny pounds. WHEN YOUR NEWBORN CHILD IS LOSING WEIGHT, YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING WRONG, VERY WRONG.
When the judge told the defendants they could ask for a new trial, Thomas hung his head low. "I'm dying every day in there," he said, "and that could take three years."
Posted by:Zenster

#10  Ptah, thank you for the correction. It was, indeed, the JWs I was think of. I appreciate you checking in.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-09 23:43  

#9  Pure and total crap!

The Tsarevich is on a soy based formula as a supplement to breast milk. He can't tolerate one with a milk base. It's expensive, but it's what he needs, so we just have to suck it up until he gets older.

And to answer Zenster's question, yes, there are specialty formulas out there for kids who can't tolerate the milk or soy based regular ones. My niece is on one, and so is one of the Tsarevich's little "buddies". Both girls are doing great.

Not that I qualify, but through my mom's group I have it on good authority that if you are poor and need to have formula for your little one, it's covered under the WIC programs in each state, specifically to avoid the very real possibility of a baby starving to death by parents trying to use substitutes that are nutritionally inferior.

They just wanted to cheap it out by using far less expensive soy milk, and the poor little boy paid the price. Hell, the Tsarevich is 7 1/2 months, and he's still considered too young for apple juice! What the hell were these idiots thinking??

Rest in peace, Crown.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2007-05-09 23:13  

#8  I was a Seventh-day Adventist, and they believe in no such thing. In fact, they have a very large hospital system that uses all the latest techniques and technology, and their people are top notch. They feed that system with two accredited medical schools and about 10 nursing colleges.

You're mistaking them for the Jehovah's Witnesses. Yeah, they're vegans, and legalists, but they were never legalistic about that, and accepted meat eaters as members in good standing. They'll be the FIRST to tell you to take whatever medical and dietary measures it takes to stay in good health, and if what you're doing isn't working, CHANGE TO SOMETHING THAT DOES.
Posted by: Ptah   2007-05-09 22:36  

#7  er... Christian Scientists?
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-09 22:07  

#6  This should have been a conviction on a capital offence.

It was, unfortunately the baby was executed for his parents' stupidity. Let's all hope the judge possessed sufficient wisdom to prohibit any future conjugal visits for these two assclowns.

Ya gotta wonder if they actually tried to make the child survive on a diet of strained peas and applesauce. HELL, at six weeks, the kid wasn't even supposed to be on regular food of any sort. No meat, no cheese, no eggs, no milk, not even HONEY, fer fuck's sake. You've got to wonder, as Gladys speculated whether they even prohibited the child its own mother's milk. It's one of the only ways to explain the poor thing's starvation. Aren't there entirely synthetic infant formulas for newborns who are fatally allergic to all milk products? This is dangerously close to the Seventh Day Adventists who try to prohibit their children from receiving transfusions and other life-saving medical interventions.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-09 21:53  

#5  This should have been a conviction on a capital offence.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-05-09 20:14  

#4  Nothing to be sorry about, Barb. Warrants repetition.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-05-09 19:59  

#3  Oops. Sorry about the repeat.

Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-05-09 19:42  

#2  "I'm dying every day in there"

Works for me.

At least you won't get the chance to murder another baby.

Works for me.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-05-09 19:26  

#1  Wow, I didn't realize being Vegan meant no breastmilk for babies. But I guess it makes sense in a warped way.
Posted by: Gladys   2007-05-09 18:31  

00:00