You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Bush Would Veto Democrats' New Iraq Bill
2007-05-10
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush would veto any bill drafted by House Democratic leaders that would fund the Iraq war only into the summer months, his spokesman said Wednesday. And Defense Secretary Robert Gates told a Senate committee that such short-term funding would be very disruptive and ``have a huge impact'' on contracts to repair and replace equipment. The Defense Department, he said, just doesn't ``have the agility to manage a two month appropriation.''

Gates also told the Senate Defense Appropriations panel that if the military begins to see progress in Iraq later this fall, including political reconciliation within the Iraqi government, the U.S. could begin withdrawing troops. The Pentagon, he said, is ``looking for the direction of events - we don't have to have it all locked in place and everything complete ... If (we) see some very positive progress and it looks like things are heading in the right direction, then that's the point at which I think we can begin to consider reducing some of those forces.''

He added that ``getting the level of violence in Iraq to point where the political process can go forward and seeing some progress in reconciliation sets the stage for us to begin withdrawing our units ... and allowing those security responsibilities to be assumed by the Iraqis.''

Gates has said commanders in Iraq will provide as assessment of the conditions in Iraq in September. And he said Wednesday that the Iraqis are assuming more security responsibilities day by day, but the U.S. cannot abandon the country prematurely. Doing so, he said, would allow al-Qaida terrorists to use Iraq's western Anbar province as a base to plan operations against the United States.

The Democrats' proposal would pay for the war through July, then give Congress the option of cutting off money after that if conditions do not improve. Bush requested more than $90 billion to fund the war through September.

``There are restrictions on funding and there are also some of the spending items that were mentioned in the first veto message that are still in the bill,'' White House press secretary Tony Snow said on Air Force One traveling with Bush. Asked directly if Bush would veto the House bill in its current form, Snow said, ``Yes.''
Good. Now stick to it.
Posted by:Steve White

#12  Here's part of the text that I can not find in any coverage of his statements:

And the second part of your question was about benchmarks. Look, let me talk about this recent effort by Congress to fund our troops. The idea that the House of Representatives put forward is one that we will fund our troops by piecemeal.

Secretary Gates was very strong about why that's a bad idea. And the American people must understand that if you fund our troops every two months, you're in a -- put in a position where we have to delay certain procurement, or that military contracts must be delayed -- there's a lot of uncertainty in funding when it comes to two-month cycles. So we reject that idea. It won't work.

I find it odd that the Congress is -- I find it ironic that the Congress is ready to fully fund unrelated domestic spending items, and only one-half of the money requested for our troops. They provide 100 percent of the money for the special interest projects that don't have anything to do with fighting the war on terror, and 50 percent of the money to go to those who wear our uniform. They got it wrong. They ought to provide 100 percent of the money for people who wear the uniform, and leave these special pork projects out of the bill. And so I'll veto the bill if it's this haphazard piecemeal funding. And I made that clear.
Posted by: Sherry   2007-05-10 17:42  

#11  I love Steve Quayle, I plan on getting his giants book eventually! Not sure he's the most credible source around for hard news, though.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-05-10 14:57  

#10  "Let's see where they are in the real elections."

Meeting with "Senator" Ned Lamont. lol
Posted by: Daffy Phuns6221   2007-05-10 14:22  

#9  Seems like the anti-war freaks are well ahead in the all-u-can-eat bullshit contest.
Let's see where they are in the real elections.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-05-10 09:07  

#8  I copy JM.
Blue 17 Blue 17 Hotel California
Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-10 08:50  

#7  YNETNEWS > Spanish-language TELEMUNDO TV [Florida] > HIZBALLAH PLANS US ATTACKS, from new bases in South Ameirca; + MUSLIM CLERIC THREATENS TEL AVIV.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-10 03:15  

#6  FREEREPUBLIC/WORLDNEWS > UNO: MOST INTERNATIONAL SURVEYS WANT UN TO HAVE MORE WORLD AUTHORITY. See also WND for various artiiiiiickles for or against alleged NORTH AMERICAN UNION, NORTH AMER INTEGRATION, and now NORTH AMER COMMUNITY. Move along, boyz, obviously no OWG here.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-10 03:11  

#5  STEVE QUAYLE.com > 2007:TERROR ATTACKS AND INVASION OF THE UNITED STATES article.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-10 02:48  

#4  KOMMERSANT > NORTH KOREA and Banco DA > RUSSIAN AND ITALIAN BANKS REFUSE TO ACCEPT NK's MONEY, despite US$13.0 Milyuuhn already being there in separate accounts. No $$$ no NK shutdown.; + NORTH KOREA WANTS USA TO LAUNDER ITS MONEY - NK now demanding $$$ be set up in a NEW YORK, USA bank. * WORLD NEWS > IRAN BEGINS PRODUCING NUCLEAR/URANIUM FUEL UNDERGROUND. Back to KOMMERSANT > RUSSIAN STRATEGIC MISSLES TO HAVE "SPLIT WARHEADS" IN 2010, aka MRV-MIRV's.; + RUSSIAN GENERAL : NO LINK BETWEEN US-SOVIET CFE TREATY AND RUSSIAN FORCES IN FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS. START I Treaty due to expire in 2009, Russ troops to stay put in former SSR's iff Russia and only Russia wants them to. *WORLDNEWS > US Pert > BUSH'S/AMERICA'S POLICIES MAY BE FUELING TERRORISM. CHINA DAILY Op-Ed > IRAN's alleged intention that it wants only nuclear energy is INCOMPATIBLE/INCONSISTENT wid its failure to publicly declare any and all of its nuke activities under UNIAEA + NPT guidelines.
UNTIL IRAN DOES SO, CHINA > WORLD HAS RIGHT TO SUSPECT IRAN'S NUCLEAR MOTIVES.

HAMAS + "MICKEY MOUSE" icon > FOX + CNN's > show segments as shown clearly mention GLOBAL AGENDA of anti-ISRAEL, anti-WESTERN ISLAM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-10 02:36  

#3  FOX NEWS > HILLARY > If Dubya doesn't withdraw US troops from Iraq, AS POTUS SHE WILL.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-10 00:53  

#2  A 90 day requisition system, an Emergency bill, no support, where is the Grace? Give the military what they need now please and use theatrics afterward.
Posted by: newc   2007-05-10 00:30  

#1  "Abandon the country" > as said before, JUAN WILLIAMS + ALAN COLMES had both stated that the US Dems only mean for an end to US-led, active combat/ground operations in Iraq, NOT A TOTAL OR COMPLETE US PULLOUT = WITHDRAWAL FROM IRAQ-ME, although JUAN changed his mind later on. * INCONSISTENT IFF NOT HYPOCRITICAL + LYING? PHRASES like the above only serve to [wilfully?]confuse mainstream America and [wilfully?]degrade the US voters-beliefs in our national leadership + institutions + VALUES! WOT > THE TERRORISTS + COMMIES-GOVTISTS + POLITICISTS HAVE WON WHEN AMERS CAN NO LONGER DISCUSS IMPORTANT ISSUES, INCLUD BUT NOT LIMITED TO OWG-SWO, etal. ON THEIR OWN MERITS. BUT HAVE TO HIDE TRUE INTENTIONS FROM THE VOTERS = THE PEOPLE.
Posted by: JOsephMendiola   2007-05-10 00:29  

00:00