You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Revenue Collections Hit Record High in April, Improve Budget Deficit
2007-05-12
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal revenue collections hit an all-time high in April, contributing to a further improvement in the budget deficit for the year. Releasing its monthly budget report, the Treasury Department said Thursday that through the first seven months of this budget year, the deficit totals $80.8 billion, significantly below the $184.1 billion imbalance run up during the first seven months of the 2006 budget year.

So far this year, tax revenues total $1.505 trillion, an increase of 11.2 percent over the same period last year. That figure includes $383.6 billion collected in April, the largest monthly tax collection on record. Tax collections swell in April every year as individuals file their tax returns by the deadline.

For the first seven months of this budget year, which began Oct. 1, revenue collections and government spending are at all-time highs. However, the spending total of $1.585 billion was up at a slower pace of 3.2 percent from the previous year. The difference in the growth of tax collections and spending is the reason for the narrowing deficit.
He must know TW is reading this.
The Congressional Budget Office said that it now expects the deficit for all of 2007 to total between $150 billion and $200 billion. That would be a significant improvement from last year's deficit of $248.2 billion, which had been the lowest imbalance in four years.

The federal budget was in surplus for four years from 1998 through 2001 as the long economic expansion helped push revenues higher. But the 2001 recession, the cost of fighting a global war on terror and the loss of revenue from President Bush's tax cuts sent the budget back into the red starting in 2002.
Let's see, lower taxes by 20% or whatever, double the revenue stream or whatever, and end up with 1.6 times as much money as before. Obviously broken because the fed's cut is only 80% of twice as much. Now why are you looking at me like that?
The administration's budget sent to Congress in February projects that the deficit will be eliminated by 2012 even if the president achieves his goal of getting his tax cuts made permanent. They are now due to expire in 2010.

However, critics say the improvement in the deficits will be only temporary with deficits expected to balloon again with the higher Social Security and Medicare payments needed as 78 million baby boomers retire.
Critics of what? The resilient Bush economy or our government's "illogical" refusal to address looming social security shortcomings? I'll bet they're wishing they hadn't raided social security using that "pay as you go" bull$hit excuse. Oh well. Where's the credit card?
While Bush sought to make entitlement reform the centerpiece of his domestic agenda in a second term, his proposals to bolster Social Security with personal savings accounts has gone nowhere in Congress.
Why?
White House Budget Director Rob Portman said the surge in tax revenues over the past two years was directly related to the economic rebound spurred by the Bush tax cuts. He said Congress should reject efforts to roll back the tax relief.
They should. It will depend on whether or not a bunch of insecure self-righteous power-hungry hypocritical myopics are in charge or not.
"With strong economic growth and spending restraint, we can continue to reduce budget deficits and balance the budget as the president has proposed," Portman said in a statement.
If it ain't 100% perfect, fix it until it is!
For April, revenue receipts totaled $383.64 billion while spending totaled $205.97 billion, leaving a surplus for the month of $177.7 billion.
Posted by:gorb

#7  Thank you, gorb dear. What a lovely bonbon with which to start the weekend!

Other than that, they're a mostly OK bunch. Except for a few exceptions that I can think of. :-)
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-12 21:14  

#6  Meanwhile..the tax bill at the state and local level continue to rise.

Remember when you're paying more than 50% of the product of your labor or skill to the government in one form or another regardless of level, we've returned to a tax based serfdom.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-12 10:07  

#5  Jeez, it's all BS, everyones bedwetting about the defecit and the NATIONAL DEBT. Yawl ever think of your grandchillrun? Don't want to leave them a piece of the bill? Why the hell not? Those little unborn tykes should shoulder a burder of what makes them free. Ima talking about the Virginias, the Improved Nimitz's, the cost of bringing freedom to Iraq and the Aghans, it right that they should pay. Is there a damn cost accountant left alive? Hell if you amortized the cost of a B-52 over 50 years it would come down to less than the cost of keeping open the Capps Post Office.

Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-12 07:49  

#4  Thank you, gorb dear. What a lovely bonbon with which to start the weekend!

a bunch of insecure self-righteous power-hungry hypocritical myopics
Ouch.

his proposals to bolster Social Security with personal savings accounts has gone nowhere in Congress.
*shrug* Those of us coming up behind the baby boom understand there isn't going to be any Social Security money for our retirement, except for the very poor. We're saving on our own, tax break or no. (Mr. Wife wants to ensure I'm not a burden on our great-grandchildren, should I live to 120 as I keep threatening.)
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-12 06:42  

#3  White House Budget Director Rob Portman said the surge in tax revenues over the past two years was directly related to the economic rebound spurred by the Bush tax cuts........and millions of Mexicans working here "illegally" but paying taxes. He said Congress should reject efforts to roll back the tax relief.

The scheme continues.
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-05-12 06:01  

#2  Congress just does not get the concept of "spending restraint". We need a line item veto and a legitimate fiscal conservative as our president before we can get out of the red.
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723   2007-05-12 02:59  

#1  If it ain't 100% perfect, fix it until it is!

Fix it until it is broke, that is!
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-12 02:31  

00:00