You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq lawmakers deadlocked over constitution reforms
2007-05-24
BAGHDAD - An Iraqi parliamentary committee has failed to finalise an agreement on amending key articles in the constitution, one of the political benchmarks Washington says are important to end sectarian violence.

After six months of talks, the constitutional reform committee had been expected to present parliament with a final draft of their recommendations on Tuesday. Committee members said they would ask political leaders to deal with sensitive issues such as sharing IraqÂ’s oil wealth more equitably and ending a ban on former members of Saddam HusseinÂ’s party members holding public office.

“We have agreed on some articles but there are sensitive issues which need an agreement among the political leaders,” said Saleem al-Jubouri, a member of the Accordance Front, the biggest Sunni political bloc in parliament. Jubouri said Sunni Arab and Shi’ite members of the committee disagreed with a Kurdish demand to allow regions to distribute oil income rather than the central government.

Some lawmakers from the ruling ShiÂ’ite community, which was oppressed during SaddamÂ’s rule, are virulently opposed to former Baathists taking up government jobs. Non-Arab Kurds, also persecuted under SaddamÂ’s pan-Arab policies, resist wording on the Arab identity of Iraq.
Something to offend everyone!
Jubouri said that one area of disagreement was the status of the ethnically mixed city of Kirkuk which sits atop one of the worldÂ’s richest oilfields. The current constitution says Iraq should hold a referendum on the final status of Kirkuk this year. While Kurds claim Kirkuk as part of Kurdistan, Arabs oppose this.

Another official in the committee said Arab members -- Shi’ites and Sunnis -- proposed making Kirkuk a separate region and dropping the idea of the referendum, which Kurds would anyway be likely to win. “Of course the Kurds don’t want this because they still want it to be part of their autonomous region,” the official said. ”Only political leaders can decide on this. These are very sensitive issues.”
Posted by:Steve White

#2  OK, Gen. Petraeus, repeat after me, "I fully realize that all the constitutional and other changes under consideration by the Iraqi parliament will have no material effect on the security situation whatever the legislative outcome, and that progress on the security front requires violence, coercion, the threat of violence, cash, continuing to improve Iraqi security forces, and general toughness. I will state this each day at the beginning of the BUA, and all MNF-I and MNC-I staff will recite this language to start every staff meeting, and also every time they hear anything on TV about political solutions from some nitwit journalist, congresscritter, or White House official."
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-05-24 02:05  

#1  Typical Arab decision making. They can only agree to disagree. There has to be a fire under their feet (literally) to get anything at all done.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-05-24 00:30  

00:00