You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
He's Baaackk (Mookie)
2007-05-25
BAGHDAD - Radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr appeared in women's clothing public for the first time in months on Friday, delivering a fiery anti-American sermon to thousands of followers and demanding U.S. troops leave Iraq.

Al-Sadr had gone into hiding in Iran four months ago at the start of the U.S.-led Baghdad security crackdown. It was not immediately clear why he chose to return now to his base in the Shiite holy city of Najaf. However, he could be trying to take advantage of the absence of a major rival, Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq leader Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, who was recently diagnosed with lung cancer and went to Iran for treatment.
I generally don't think 'Tehran' when I think of treatment for lung cancer.
Al-Sadr traveled in a long motorcade from Najaf to the adjacent holy city of Kufa on Friday morning to deliver his sermon before 6,000 worshippers.
I hope we had an eye in the sky following him back to wherever he came from.
"No, no for Satan. No, no for America. No, no for the occupation. No, no for Israel," he chanted in a call and response with the audience at the start of his speech.

He repeated his long-standing call for U.S. forces to leave Iraq. "We demand the withdrawal of the occupation forces, or the creation of a timetable for such a withdrawal," he said. "I call upon the Iraqi government not to extend the occupation even for a single day."
Sounds like Mahmoud gave him his talking points.
He also condemned fighting between his Mahdi Army militia and Iraqi security forces, saying it "served the interests of the occupiers." Instead, he said the militia should turn to peaceful protests, such as demonstrations and sit-ins, he said.

As part of his effort to recast himself as a nationalist — instead of a radical with a narrow Shiite agenda — the 33-year-old leader called on Sunnis to join with him in the fight against the U.S. troop presence here. He also criticized the government's inability to provide reliable services to the people. Al-Sadr is believed to be honing plans to consolidate political gains and foster ties with Iran.

His Mahdi Army fought U.S. troops to a virtual standstill in 2004,
Bullsh** - casualty ratios at better than 20:1 as I understand, and we were being 'delicate' to avoid excess collateral damage.
but to avoid getting wiped out renewed confrontation he ordered his militants off the streets when the U.S. began its security crackdown in the Baghdad area.

His associates say his strategy is based partly on a belief that Washington soon will start reducing troop strength, leaving behind a hole in Iraq's security and political power structure that he can fill.
He's got that right - thanks, Dems, MSM.
Al-Sadr also believes that Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government may soon collapse under its failure to improve security, services and the economy, al-Sadr's aides say. A political reshuffle would give the Sadrist movement, with its 30 seats in the 275-member parliament, an opportunity to become a major player. In a move that could hasten the collapse, al-Sadr pulled his supporters out of al-Maliki's government last month over the prime minister's refusal to call for a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal.
Posted by:Glenmore

#8  
Right here. Put the bullet right here.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-05-25 16:41  

#7  So I guess this means he'll be easier to kill now?

We can only hope so. Squashing this turd would send a critical message on several levels. We really need to make it crystal clear that no matter how effing "holy" any Muslim SOB is supposed to be, they will still get their head blown off for shouting "death to America!"

Capping Sadr would not only stall his insurgency but also show that Islam and its aristocracy means diddly-squat to us if they insist upon harming our troops. Attaching a fatal price tag to such activities is a vital way of conveying our supreme displeasure with such chicanery. Finally, we are obliged to ourselves to kill this rutbag for all the grief he has caused. Iraq must learn that when we sneeze, they are going to catch a cold all hell.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-25 15:28  

#6  So I guess this means he'll be easier to kill now?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-05-25 12:47  

#5  Mookie is Rosie O in drag.

Hint: Have you ever see the two of them together?
Posted by: Injun Chash5595   2007-05-25 11:37  

#4  "(Hakim) went to Iran for treatment."

Is Houston in Iran now? I thought he went to MD Anderson.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-05-25 11:37  

#3  His Mahdi Army fought U.S. troops to a virtual standstill in 2004

Ah - one of the classics, I'd forgotten this one. When such preposterous inversions of reality can become "slugs" (boilerplate facts inserted for background into all stories), things are way, way past the crisis point in the profession of journalism. Wire services are the worst, most important perps. As the NYT front page drives most TV "news", the wires now dominate all international coverage that Americans see. Scary, and infuriating.
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-05-25 11:11  

#2  Who let him cross the border, and why haven't they been clapped in irons?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-25 08:29  

#1  Taking a clue from his allies, the Democrats, "al-Sadr pulled his supporters out of al-Maliki's government last month over the prime minister's refusal to call for a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal."
Posted by: Bobby   2007-05-25 07:48  

00:00