You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Prince Harry may still get a chance to see action
2007-05-29
Prince Harry could still fulfil his dream of serving in a war zone after Army chiefs drew up plans for him to serve with UK forces in Afghanistan this summer.

Desperate to salvage some credibility from the debacle of his cancelled mission to Iraq, top brass are considering sending him with fellow officers to help train the Afghan army. The young prince was due to deploy as a troop commander with his Blues and Royals Regiment to southern Iraq this month, until the head of the Army General Sir Richard Dannatt decided it was too dangerous both for him and his fellow-soldiers.

The 22-year-old prince has been trained to lead a 12-strong armoured reconnaissance unit, but he would instead join a small group of fellow officers - including some from his own regiment - in Afghanistan. Senior defence officials hope commanders would be able to keep Harry away from the public gaze, allowing him to carry out a meaningful role without facing excessive risks. It is hoped he could travel to Afghanistan unannounced, spend a few weeks there and return without attracting publicity.

The plan would ease his bitter disappointment at not being allowed to serve with his unit - which is now in Iraq being led by a stand-in junior commander - and could even keep alive Harry's dream of a long-term Army career. One Army insider told the Mail: "I'm sure Harry will jump at the chance. It may not be the same as going to Iraq with his own guys, but it's better than sitting at home 'on his a***', as he put it.

Clarence House declined to comment, saying: "Operational deployments are a matter for the Ministry of Defence." The MoD declined to comment on security grounds. But senior commanders are all too aware of how sensitive the plans are, say insiders, and a final decision from Sir Richard is not expected for some weeks.

It was three weeks ago that Sir Richard announced an 11th hour U-turn over Harry's planned deployment to Iraq. He said "specific intelligence" meant the risk to the prince and to his fellow soldiers would be too high. Commanders had learned of plots to seize Harry and smuggle him across the border to Iran -raising the nightmare prospect of a royal hostage crisis. An insurgent sniper had also been ordered to assassinate him as a "priority".

The decision was a crushing blow for Harry, who had said publicly there was no way he wanted to "haul his sorry a***" through Sandhurst only to be left behind while his men went off to war. Publicly he accepted the decision and Clarence House played down talk of him quitting the Army, but in private he told friends he still hoped to be able to serve in a combat zone.
Posted by:Pappy

#9  WXJMAMES, the pappazi are every were
Posted by: sinse   2007-05-29 17:54  

#8  Any publicity on the issue sucks. The Brits need to keep Harry's whereabouts secret, and go from there. If he was now in iraq, nobody would know and the world would be chasing a paper Harry to all the corners of the world. Harry look-alikes with blackened faces could be getting on buses and planes for all points so the enemy will never know where he is.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-05-29 11:31  

#7  It's an interesting situation because the oath the Tommies swear is
I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors and that I will as in duty bound honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, her heirs and successors in person, crown and dignity against all enemies and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, her heirs and successors and of the generals and officers set over me.

It would be interesting to see what happened if Grandma put her foot down and told the brass to send him to Iraq when they clearly don't want to. On the other hand, if Grandma doesn't want him to go, though she is only further eviscerating the monarchy yet the other Commonwealth countries would still be unlikely to cross her. So it looks like Harry gets a raw deal all round. They better hope Wills has a long life.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-05-29 08:54  

#6  Could any of our Commonwealth contributors comment on the ability of Harry getting a commission in their forces [Australia or Canada] and shipped to Iraq or Afghanistan?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-29 07:41  

#5  Credit to him, he wants to go to Iraq.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-05-29 06:25  

#4  If he doesn't get sent on a mission it strikes me that resignation may be the honorable course of action.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-29 03:19  

#3  There are credible reports coming out of the UK that Harry could either resign his commission or simply fritter away his remaining commitment (and pointedly, NOT re-enlist) in some staff position, if he is not allowed into a combat zone. The British Royals have always served in the military; hell, Queen Elizabeth did during WWII. What surprises me is that she is trying to castrate the present generation of princes, just like she did to Charles.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2007-05-29 01:18  

#2  I think they ought to try to figure out a way to put out a few crash test dummies , announce that he has arrived, and blast every Talib that comes to ambush him! :)
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-29 01:06  

#1  This has more risk than a straight out combat role. All the Taliban has to do is sign up some recruits and sit back and wait. He will come to them.
Posted by: Grunter   2007-05-29 00:16  

00:00