You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
CIA to Air Decades of Its Dirty Laundry
2007-06-22
Most of this stuff was revealed decades ago, although not in detail.
The CIA will declassify hundreds of pages of long-secret records detailing some of the intelligence agency's worst illegal abuses -- the so-called "family jewels" documenting a quarter-century of overseas assassination attempts, domestic spying, kidnapping and infiltration of leftist groups from the 1950s to the 1970s, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said yesterday.

The documents, to be publicly released next week, also include accounts of break-ins and theft, the agency's opening of private mail to and from China and the Soviet Union, wiretaps and surveillance of journalists, and a series of "unwitting" tests on U.S. civilians, including the use of drugs.

"Most of it is unflattering, but it is CIA's history," Hayden said in a speech to a conference of foreign policy historians. The documents have been sought for decades by historians, journalists and conspiracy theorists and have been the subject of many fruitless Freedom of Information Act requests.

In anticipation of the CIA's release, the National Security Archive at George Washington University yesterday published a separate set of documents from January 1975 detailing internal government discussions of the abuses. Those documents portray a rising sense of panic within the administration of President Gerald R. Ford that what then-CIA Director William E. Colby called "skeletons" in the CIA's closet had begun to be revealed in news accounts.

A New York Times article by reporter Seymour Hersh of course about the CIA's infiltration of antiwar groups, published in December 1974, was "just the tip of the iceberg," then-Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger warned Ford, according to a Jan. 3 memorandum of their conversation.

Kissinger warned that if other operations were divulged, "blood will flow," saying, "For example, Robert Kennedy personally managed the operation on the assassination of [Cuban President Fidel] Castro." Kennedy was the attorney general from 1961 to 1964.

Worried that the disclosures could lead to criminal prosecutions, Kissinger added that "when the FBI has a hunting license into the CIA, this could end up worse for the country than Watergate," the scandal that led to the fall of the Nixon administration the previous year.

In a meeting at which Colby detailed the worst abuses -- after telling the president "we have a 25-year old institution which has done some things it shouldn't have" -- Ford said he would appoint a presidential commission to look into the matter. "We don't want to destroy but to preserve the CIA. But we want to make sure that illegal operations and those outside the [CIA] charter don't happen," Ford said.

Most of the major incidents and operations in the reports to be released next week were revealed in varying detail during congressional investigations that led to widespread intelligence reforms and increased oversight. But the treasure-trove of CIA documents, generated as the Vietnam War wound down and agency involvement in Nixon's "dirty tricks" political campaign began to be revealed, is expected to provide far more comprehensive accounts, written by the agency itself.
Posted by:lotp

#6  Might I suggest that the revelations might include how biased the medja was at the time.

How many journos were working for Americas enemies etc.

I'm sure if released the press will try to cover it up and blogs will cover it.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2007-06-22 20:20  

#5  the so-called "family jewels"

A strange turn of a phrase. Is this akin to getting kneed in the groin--half-heartedly?

This all seems like a rehash of old stuff. Throwing someone or the press a bone?
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-06-22 13:56  

#4  Turns out that Jimmuah lusted after that CIA rabbit.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-06-22 12:41  

#3  Might be a diversion. Congress just issued subpoenas against Bush to reveal details of current domestic surveillance. Let's let the NYT and their ilk go wallow in old stories instead.
Posted by: lotp   2007-06-22 08:41  

#2  A cynic might say so that it'll be old news by the time the presidential race gets close, Sgt. Mom. Equally probable a punch-point date was reached, and the release happened automatically. But I'm sure the clever minds here at Rantburg will come up with something much more interesting. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-06-22 08:28  

#1  Damn... you mean there's anything left that hasn't been already leaked to the NY Times, et al?

Interesting timing, though... any ideas on how come now?
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2007-06-22 07:38  

00:00