You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
From political darkness, economic optimism
2007-07-07
BANGKOK – After nearly two years of political doom and gloom, suddenly Thailand’s economic prospects are brightening. Foreign investors have ushered in the 10th anniversary of Thailand’s spectacular 1997 collapse with a buying binge, recently bidding up the local bourse and currency to 10-year highs. But should foreign punters be so optimistic?

Foreign capital is rushing into the country, with foreign equity inflows so far this year exceeding US$3.7 billion, including an inrush of US$600 million over the last fortnight. Foreign direct investments (FDI) has also exceeded expectations, and some economic analysts believe those capital inflows could accelerate in the months ahead as the government approves more foreign applications to produce so-called “eco-cars”.

Political uncertainty and policy miscues have this year weighed against the Thai bourseÂ’s performance, which on a price-equity ratio basis has lagged badly most other global emerging markets. Now with deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra fading from view, and the ruling military junta that ousted him sticking to its promise to hold democratic polls by yearÂ’s end, investors see new clarity in the countryÂ’s political outlook.

“It’s clear now that Thailand is not going to fall off the cliff anytime soon,” says Cem Karacadag, an economist with Credit Suisse. “And it’s the cheapest market in Asia.”
The article continues at length with not a single word about the insurgency in the southern provinces. How in the world would investor plop their money into what's going to be strife-ridden state, unless they're betting that the Buddhist north is going to land hard on the insurgents?
Posted by:Steve White

#4  WRT corruption, apparently it can sometimes be useful, or at least less bad than some alternatives. (Dalrymple)
Posted by: James   2007-07-07 17:13  

#3  Western and Japanese investing in Thailand was vogue back in the late 80's early 90's especially non-recourse financing of infrastructure projects like toll roads and transit systems. But the Thais renigged on a number of deals (i.e. lowering tolls and profit margins, etc.). I can't think of any changes that would revive western financial interest there.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-07 14:36  

#2  Zen, actually... the map shows what a cesspit of corruption most of the world is.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-07-07 03:10  

#1  How in the world would investor plop their money into what's going to be strife-ridden state, unless they're betting that the Buddhist north is going to land hard on the insurgents?

At number 63 out of 163 nations, Transparency International rates Lebanon and Columbia as less corrupt than Thailand. Go figure. For reference, the USA is number 20 and Finland leads the pack. At the link there's a very informative color-coded map that shows what a cesspit of corruption the entire MME (Muslim Middle East) happens to be.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-07 02:39  

00:00