You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
'Taliban get stronger in Afghanistan'
2007-07-19
NATO countries are not giving the international force securing Afghanistan enough support and there are worrying signs that the Taliban are growing stronger, a detailed study by BritainÂ’s parliament has found. The report, by the House of Commons Defence Committee, highlighted a series of concerns, from a lack of training for Afghan police and armed forces to an unclear policy on eradicating the countryÂ’s vast opium poppy fields. But the chief preoccupation was a lack of support from other NATO countries to provide more troops to the 36,000-strong ISAF mission and evidence that violence, including Iraq-style suicide bombings, was growing as Taliban and Al Qaeda-linked insurgents expand their sphere of influence outwards from the south.

Britain, which leads NATO forces in the restive Helmand province in the southern Afghanistan, is one of the largest contributors to the mission, with 7,100 troops. “We remain deeply concerned that the reluctance of Germany France Italy Spain Belgium some NATO countries to provide troops for the ISAF mission in Afghanistan is undermining NATO’s credibility and also ISAF operations,” the bi-partisan committee concluded in its 65-page report.

While praising Britain’s commitment to the overall mission, the report’s authors added, “The Ministry of Defence asserts that the Taliban insurgency does not pose a strategic threat to Afghanistan (but) violence seems to be increasing and spreading to the previously more peaceful provinces in the north and west ... and the capital. Moreover, civilian casualties undermine support for ISAF and the government of Afghanistan and fuel the insurgency, further endangering our troops.”

Britain Defence Minister Des Browne called the report “balanced” and said he also wanted more NATO help. He denied that the situation in Afghanistan had worsened significantly or that British air assets were overstretched. “We have overmatched them every time they’ve faced up to us,” he said of the Taliban, adding that Afghanistan was a long-term commitment for foreign forces. “Suggesting we should back off and leave it alone is not the answer.”
Posted by:Fred

#4  Sounds to me like the British Parliament wants to pull a DNC and pull out of Afghanistan. This may be the opening salvo of such a move. The last thing the West needs to do is pull out of Afghanistan OR Iraq. Let's hope it's not, but keep an eye open in case it is a call for a bug-out.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-07-19 14:40  

#3  The Brits should know that saying the enemy is getting stronger isn't the way to get EU troops to come in larger numbers.
Posted by: Oldcat   2007-07-19 13:42  

#2  This reconciles rather oddly with Hekmatyar's plea for a truce.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-19 12:39  

#1  Can't see how the Taliban are going to get stronger now that Wazi-land will be focused on Musharraf and Pakistani soldiers.
Posted by: danking_70   2007-07-19 11:05  

00:00