You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Brown wonÂ’t rule out military action in Iran
2007-07-24
LONDON - British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said on Monday he would not rule out military action against Iran, but believed a policy of sanctions could still persuade Teheran to drop its disputed nuclear programme.
Yap, yap, yap.
“I firmly believe that the sanctions policy that we are pursuing will work, but I’m not one who’s going forward to say that we rule out any particular form of action,” Brown told a news conference, when asked if he would rule out a military strike against Iran.
He firmly believes it will work. Just has to. Nope, won't say what he'll do if it doesn't.
The United Nations Security Council has imposed two rounds of sanctions since December on Iran for failing to halt enrichment, a process which can produce fuel for power plants or material for warheads. A third sanctions resolution is being considered. Iran resumed working with the U.N. watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency this month to clear up outstanding questions about its nuclear activity and improve IAEA inspectorsÂ’ access to its enrichment plant.

This, say some European diplomats, has prompted the six big powers working on the issue -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany -- to quietly put off forever until September efforts to toughen existing sanctions, in hopes IranÂ’s improved cooperation with U.N. inspectors may defuse the standoff.

“I firmly believe the sanctions we are imposing on Iran are sanctions that are having an effect already ... we are going to have to consider what we do in future,” Brown said. “There will probably be a third resolution in relation to Iran soon ...I appeal to the Iranian authorities to understand the feelings that other countries have about the development of their nuclear weapons programme.”
If they considered the feeling of other countries, they wouldn't be the Mad Mullahs™, now would they?
Posted by:Steve White

#21  "I appeal to the Iranian authorities to understand the feelings that other countries..."

Feelings? Feelings? Nothing more than feelings? What? Was Brownine at Babs' concert the other night and she did this old song just for him and it is now an earworm in his pointy little skull?
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-07-24 14:05  

#20  The British troops are great. Their political leadership sucks. Much like ours....

I'll cheerfully agree to that distinction.

nattering nabobs of negativism

Paging Spiro to the white courtesy phone.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-24 13:48  

#19  
By the time Brown gives up on sanctions there won't BE a UK anymore. Check in with EU Referendum. This IGC "treaty" will stip all sovereignty from the individual Euro states and give it to Brussels in the area of Foreign and Defense Policy.

Even the weasels themselves admit that the "new" treaty is the constitution that was voted down by the French and the Dutch.

But this time, they kept the content but call it a treaty so no referendums will be allowed. Brown has already said that the Brits won't get a vote.
Posted by: AlanC   2007-07-24 13:15  

#18  I'm pretty sure Steve intended that picture as a commentary on Gordon Brown's selection of several anti-US ministers rather than as a hit on Britian herself.

Most of us here at Rantburg are deeply worried about Britain precisely because we value her as a key ally and as the original source of so much that is good in our country.
Posted by: lotp   2007-07-24 11:57  

#17  Have some respect for the Mother Country!!!!

We ran the world before you guys ever did!!!!

Left wing people are the enemy not the hardworking british people who are fleeing the UK in droves BTW!!!!
Posted by: Paul   2007-07-24 11:55  

#16  So is it agreed that the picture of the little dog is not a nice way to depict our cousins across the pond? Or maybe it was meant for Mr. Brown and not the rest of them.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-07-24 11:40  

#15  Give me an SAS team, a bn of Paras, and British tac-air, and I'll call that better than a full mech division of the pukes the German Army has sent to the Stan.

Don't diss the Brits. They punch well above their weight.
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-07-24 11:14  

#14  Roger Wilco, Paul. I would rather have a Para regiment, a few SAS and SBS squads, some Harrier cover and nice canteen with hot tea than to have the French or German divisions of pansy-wansys at my disposal. It isn't the quantity but the quality. And at the heart of the warrior class it doesn't get much better than the British soldier.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-24 10:05  

#13  We are only sick due to mass immigration which Labour has encouraged leaving us with no identity and therefore diluted patriosm.This PC Government is creating our Great country to decline as they put the immigrants ahead of their own and the proud to be british country are being actively pressurised to accept a multicultural country that was alien to us back in the 50's.The British spirit of WW11 has been replaced by delusion and apathy.This country has a welfare culture that Maggie Thatcher would never would have accepted.We are the dumping ground of Europe/World when its comes to scroungers,benefit seekers.As one czech girl told me on a recent visit to Prague 'Your country is soft they accept all the gypsies from eastern europe who do not want to work!"
Posted by: Paul   2007-07-24 09:58  

#12  The Brits are good troops. Our troops are good troops. Both of our nations suffer from left nattering nabobs of negativism and defeat

But the British nation is deeply, deeply sick. Never so many throwed away so much they owed to so few.
Posted by: JFM   2007-07-24 09:48  

#11  The British troops are great. Their political leadership sucks. Much like ours....
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-24 09:47  

#10  1. Even if there are no Brit troops to go into Iran, thats not whats important, whats important is that if and when the US goes in, the Brits would give their political support to our action.

2. The more Gordon Brown really wants sanctions to work, the more he has to leave force on the table. Only the prospect of the use of force by the US and UK will frighten the Russians into allowing tougher sanctions to pass.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2007-07-24 09:35  

#9  The Brits are good troops. Our troops are good troops. Both of our nations suffer from left nattering nabobs of negativism and defeat--mostly in the dhemmi-led Congress. We need civilian leaders worthy of the troops. The so-called dhemmi debate last night was a pathetically staged piece of dreck.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-07-24 07:30  

#8  Paul is right tho - the Brits have stood up and fought when the rest of Europe was lounging with afterdinner drinks, ignoring the peril that looms.

And tw, my understanding is the same as yours, that the British military is stretched hard.
Posted by: lotp   2007-07-24 07:14  

#7  Good to know, lotp. Thanks. Must've been reporter over exuberance.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-24 07:10  

#6  British pilots are not fully deployed. And some have trained with our UAV operators -- including for the Reaper prototypes.
Posted by: lotp   2007-07-24 07:03  

#5  There was a report the other day that the British armed forces are at maximum deployment. If I understood it correctly, there simply aren't any more reserves to throw at new problems... not to mention bullets.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-24 05:50  

#4  We might have gutless leadership but if you remember Gulf war 1 & 2,Afghanistan and Balkans we were always there unlike many of our Europeans counterparts.

Respect your allies or lose them!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Paul   2007-07-24 05:19  

#3  The fangless, declawed British lion roars yet again.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-24 03:00  

#2  We'll see how much Gall Mr Brown has, when the Offensive to stop Iran's nuke progress starts; whether by Israel or the US...I'm going to be counting how many Battle Groups and troops the Brits contribute. My gut suggests to me, like The Cornwall incident, the poodle nation may fade to the background in a valiant retreat.
Posted by: smn   2007-07-24 01:22  

#1  FREEREPUBLIC > SYRIAN OFFICIAL - WAR AGZ ISRAEL WILL BE "BALLISTIC", i.e. very likely be a de facto missle war + asymmetric guerilla war/actions agz Tel Aviv + Israeli interests in Lebanon. No promises on NOT using WMDS-CBR's.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-07-24 01:00  

00:00