You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Joint Campaign Plan leaked to NYT ... again
2007-07-24
While Washington is mired in political debate over the future of Iraq, the American command here has prepared a detailed plan that foresees a significant American role for the next two years.

The classified plan, which represents the coordinated strategy of the top American commander and the American ambassador, calls for restoring security in local areas, including Baghdad, by the summer of 2008. "Sustainable security" is to be established on a nationwide basis by the summer of 2009, according to American officials familiar with the document.

The detailed document, known as the Joint Campaign Plan, is an elaboration of the new strategy President George W. Bush signaled in January when he decided to send five additional American combat brigades and other units to Iraq. That signaled a shift from the previous strategy, which emphasized transferring to Iraqis the responsibility for safeguarding their security.

That new approach put a premium on protecting the Iraqi population in Baghdad, on the theory that improved security would provide Iraqi political leaders with the breathing space they needed to try political reconciliation.

The latest plan, which covers a two-year period, does not explicitly address troop levels or withdrawal schedules. It anticipates a decline in American forces as the "surge" in troops runs its course later this year or in early 2008. But it nonetheless assumes continued American involvement to train soldiers, act as partners with Iraqi forces and fight terrorist groups in Iraq, American officials said.

The U.S. seen in Iraq until at least '09U.S. and Iran resume Iraq talks amid heightened tensionsU.S. officials admit delays in issuing visas to Iraqis
goals in the document appear ambitious, given the immensity of the challenge of dealing with die-hard Sunni insurgents, renegade Shiite militias, Iraqi leaders who have made only fitful progress toward political reconciliation, as well as Iranian and Syrian neighbors who have not hesitated to interfere in Iraq's affairs. And the White House's interim assessment of progress, issued n July 12, is mixed.

But at a time when critics at home are defining patience in terms of weeks, the strategy may run into the expectations of many lawmakers for an early end to the American mission here.

The plan, developed by General David H. Petraeus, the senior American commander, and Ryan Crocker, the American ambassador, has been briefed to Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral William Fallon, the head of the Central Command. It is expected to be formally issued to officials here this week.
Details at the link. Of course.
Posted by:lotp

#10  eastern establishment elitist alphas

What delicious scorn dripping from every syllable, Jack is Back. Yummy.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-24 20:16  

#9  I don't care about anyone's safety. Just give me my d@mn Pulitzer already!!!
Posted by: NYT Reporter   2007-07-24 19:12  

#8  I'd be surprised that the NYT has sources that close in DoD. Most of their other seditious reporting came from civvies like NSA (well, okay somewhat civvie) and CIA (classic roster of eastern establishment elitist alphas). My money says it is a plant - trial balloon - test the long haul waters. Politically it makes negotiating sense. You want us to withdraw by April? Why, heck we're planning on staying 2 more years. You'll settle for end of September 08? Okay, that gives us the time to leave successfully as measured by election malaise in 11/08 and gives some cover to the ticket of Thompson/Giuliani.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-24 16:09  

#7  Interesting that Bush has never declared surrender and that this plan is focused on success. Could it be that Bush has not yet given in to the Democrats demands to declare that we hav lost and shall leave immediately?
/s
Posted by: Throger Thains8048   2007-07-24 14:28  

#6  Despite how it got out, isn't it classic Bush+Cheney. Feint left, run right. They have no intention of any draw down or change of tactics anytime in the near ( 5 years ?) future. Saigon in spring 1965. Just need a little more time and a few more troops. Something is bound to work. Ha ! Talk about throwing gas onto a raging fire. The Pelosi/Reid combo is already catching hell from their base about not halting the war. This ought to lift them right off the launch pad. Pressure will now be on stopping the military budget funding. It's all they can really do now. Repurcussions will show up in Nov. 2008. Bush obviously could care less, but the Pubs who are incumbents will suffer.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-07-24 13:46  

#5  Typically, when you know a leak exists, you release different copies of the same document, with subtle differences between them. While they usually catch on to this and paraphrase instead of using the exact text, often a subtle difference will slip through.

You may not nail the leaker the first time, but when you do...
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-07-24 13:45  

#4  Probably leaked from an "armed services committee" somewhere. I dunno ... maybe Congress?
Posted by: crosspatch   2007-07-24 13:28  

#3  Darth, given the continued incompetence of W's staff and his inability gain any traction, I would guess it's a trial balloon to test public opinion. However, it could very well be a leak from a staffer or the Pentagon to subvert W. I dunno.
Posted by: anymouse   2007-07-24 12:49  

#2  i am tired of traitors like the NYT doing everything they can to hurt our effort.

btw: interesting post on the belmont club about the effects of the press on the counterinsurgency Here
Posted by: Abu do you love   2007-07-24 12:48  

#1  Either this is a calculated leak by the White House, or by someone high up that is trying to scuttle something.

If it is the latter, they need dragged out into the street and shot.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-24 12:14  

00:00